Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pentagon Ousts Official Under FBI Investigation -LAT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 11:26 AM
Original message
Pentagon Ousts Official Under FBI Investigation -LAT
WASHINGTON — A senior Defense official placed under investigation by the FBI on allegations that he tried to steer Iraqi reconstruction contracts toward friends has been removed from office, Pentagon officials confirmed Friday.

John A. "Jack" Shaw, the Pentagon's deputy undersecretary for international technology security, was ordered to leave after refusing to sign a letter of resignation, the officials said. His last day was Friday.
......
Shaw allegedly tried to steer two contracts, one involving telecommunications and a second involving dredging at an Iraqi port, to companies linked to longtime friends or clients of longtime friends.

After the allegations against him surfaced last spring, Shaw responded with a report of his own, charging that one of the U.S. officials accusing him had taken bribes in a conspiracy to place Iraq's cellular phone network under the control of a former Saddam Hussein ally.

Shaw did not respond to requests for comment on his ouster. However, in e-mails and letters exchanged with Pentagon officials over his departure, Shaw portrayed himself as a whistle-blower who was being unfairly asked to resign for having highlighted problems with the cellular phone licensing process.

In a letter to Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, Shaw expanded on the accusations made in his previous report, charging that Defense Undersecretary Douglas J. Feith, his former law partner L. Marc Zell and Ahmad Chalabi, leader of the Iraqi National Congress party, were also involved in the conspiracy.........

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-fired11dec11,1,1293707.story?coll=la-headlines-nation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. The administrations seems to be imploding with corruption. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why do I think this is a HUGE story? But, why did they force him to
Edited on Sat Dec-11-04 11:37 AM by KoKo01
resign when they know this guy probably DOES have info that others have and he can blow the lid of this Adminstration? What Shaw is saying seems to confirm information we here on DU knew.

Or, am I reading this wrong? :shrug: One would think they would have done everything to keep Shaw happy...not out there with this info where he can be questioned or even sue them..?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. It might be huge, but it sounds like the FBI has been brought in to
destroy his credibility. And who knows...maybe he'll be one of those unexplained "suicides"...like the fellow in Britain (can't remember his name).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Finder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. David Kelly
Wonder if Judith Miller will get an email from him too?


Connecting dots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Geez... I hope he didn't award any nobids to anyone.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. This guy is gunning for DOUGLAS FEITH!
Feith is the bagman for Wolfowitz. He was the one heading up the Pentagon's intel office on Iraq, their top fiction writer. This is huge.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. You got it, sfexpat -- this story is about Feith....
It will be interesting to follow it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Feith is filthy
and I hope that Mr. Shaw has the testicular fortitude to push on this.

Now descending into the bowels of MendacityCentral. Hold your nose but keep it up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Rumsfeld's circular firing squad
is showing its accuracy in aiming! The Pentagon is too far gone to respond to "teambuilding". This is going to grow because the next place to play is with the press and with Rummy's profound backfire in the face this week, it will make for great reading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lanlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. and what's become of all the other investigations?
Larry Franklin, the alleged spy for Israel, to name just one. Why do the real culprits suffer no consequences?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. Shaw is the guy...
who said that the "missing" 380 tons of explosives in Iraq had been taken away by "Russian commandos".

Makes me wonder if this misinformation was fed to him, in order to discredit him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Cheney got Pissed , someone cutting into his turf .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. references to Fieth, Chalabi and "Iran Contra II"
from the article:

After the allegations against him surfaced last spring, Shaw responded with a report of his own, charging that one of the U.S. officials accusing him had taken bribes in a conspiracy to place Iraq's cellular phone network under the control of a former Saddam Hussein ally.

Shaw did not respond to requests for comment on his ouster. However, in e-mails and letters exchanged with Pentagon officials over his departure, Shaw portrayed himself as a whistle-blower who was being unfairly asked to resign for having highlighted problems with the cellular phone licensing process.

In a letter to Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, Shaw expanded on the accusations made in his previous report, charging that Defense Undersecretary Douglas J. Feith, his former law partner L. Marc Zell and Ahmad Chalabi, leader of the Iraqi National Congress party, were also involved in the conspiracy.

He also charged that Lawrence DiRita, the Pentagon's top spokesman, was organizing a "smear campaign" against him, according to an e-mail obtained by The Times. He threatened DiRita that, if forced to step down, he would unleash "Iran Contra II," a reference to the scandal that roiled the Reagan administration.


Quite an interesting lunge... would one be so crazy to charge these things with no info?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC