Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush said 'fit for duty' after physical

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 01:41 PM
Original message
Bush said 'fit for duty' after physical
12/11/2004, 1:02 p.m. ET
By JENNIFER LOVEN
The Associated Press

BETHESDA, Md. (AP) — President Bush was pronounced "fit for duty" by his doctors after his annual physical Saturday. The checkup was delayed for four months because of his heavy travel schedule during the campaign.

"I have interviewed and examined President George W. Bush and have reviewed his medical record," a statement signed by 10 doctors said. "Within the scope of my specialty, I find him to be fit for duty and have every reasonable expectation that he will remain fit for duty for the duration of his presidency."

The White House planned to release details of the four-hour examination later Saturday.

Presiding over the medical exam at the National Naval Medical Center outside Washington were White House physician Richard Tubb and Dr. Kenneth Cooper, the president of the Cooper Aerobics Center. Also involved were a radiologist, optometrist, sports physician, hearing specialist, skin specialist and cardiologist.

more: http://pennlive.com/newsflash/topstories/index.ssf?/base/politics-3/1102770241147410.xml&storylist=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why the caveat
"Within the scope of duty"? He must not be a psychiatrist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. I have never heard that used before!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. Maybe he was thinking "morally, a different story...."


"I hear there's rumors on the internets."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NervousRex Donating Member (958 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
51. A Proctologist
...would be the only specialist qualified to examine Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. How many doctors does the little worm need? Of course,
given how dim our current doctors are, it's not surprising that he needs 10 of them.

And probably not a psychiatrist amongst them, which is odd as he wants to give us all free psychiatric tests. (or make us all pay for them. :eyes: )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
52. Meanwhile many Americans are unable to afford even one doctor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Child_Of_Isis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #52
65. Shrub even has a doctor
that goes on bike rides with him. So I heard. Courtesy of the tax payers, I'm sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. If he's 'fit for duty' ...
... put him on the front lines already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. LOL nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Exactly.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Ship Him Out for Xmas
Let a hero come home early!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dem2theMax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
53. Yeah! Applauding that idea.
:bounce:


Let's hurry him up and get him over there. He can drive one of those 'not properly protected Humvees.' :evilgrin:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sabriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. I wish I had the energy to give this post the time it deserves
Urgh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm waiting for the full report...
...due out later today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Don't hold your breath. See my post below.
They haven't actually released a summation to the public since 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. An obvious misspelling. It should read "fit for doody"
Edited on Sat Dec-11-04 01:59 PM by BrklynLiberal
PS Noticed there was no neurologist on the list...Guess they did not expect to find any sign of a brain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. A little information on his physicals.
Official summation of Presidential physicals are released to the press, and since the Clinton administration, have been posted on the White House website.

Bush's 2001 physical results were posted on the White House website.

Here it is:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/08/20010804-2.html

Now, I challenge anyone here to find the official results of the 2002 and 2003 physicals on the White House website.

For 2003, there is only a summary of a press gaggle.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/08/20030802-1.html#2

No official summation, though. And I have searched and searched the internet for this document McClellan refers to in the press gaggle and haven't found it. Anyone have access to Lexis-Nexis?

For 2002, there is nothing. Absolutely not a mention.

Now let's see if his 2004 Summary of Physical Examination is posted on the White House web site. Don't hold your breath, ok?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. I wonder about the specialties of all these docs signing this caveat
I can imagine a cardiologist, for instance, stating that "within the scope of my specialty, I find him fit for duty...." Dumbya's ticker is probably fine.

But where is the overall statement of his health? I call this total b.s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
69. Dr. Cooper
is a hard-core repuke, I can tell you that much. He started the wildly profitable Cooper Aerobic Center in Dallas many years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. When I read that * had TEN doctors sign a statement
that's carefully (almost painfully) worded about how EVERYTHING IS FINE, it puts me in mind of phrases like "bulletproof evidence" of a Saddam-Osama link.

More of the same info-bullying to make it seem like only kooks and crazies could question the administration's pronouncements.

:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. I avoid looking at any pictures or footage of him
Edited on Sat Dec-11-04 03:03 PM by ailsagirl
for the same reason I avoid really looking at photos of Hitler-- he makes me ill.

But I accidentally saw a recent photo of him (in his little Nazi suit) and I thought 1) he's gotten FAT and 2) he's aged tremendously-- he looks like George Bush I only fat.

I think he's neurogically damaged-- something is wrong upstairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #23
45. He's definitely bloating. Medication?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 08:59 PM
Original message
Could be...or too much of "the good life?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #23
54. Acorrding to the following story he's a little overweight
He weighs just shy of 200 lbs. Christ I'm just as tall as him and I don't weigh that much.

BETHESDA, Md. (Reuters) - President Bush was declared to be in "superior" health after his annual physical exam on Saturday but lamented a weight gain he blamed on months of campaign travel.


"Although I think the doctor put out a report that shows me to be physically fit -- I'm still able to get on the stress test -- I'm a little overweight," he said. "Therefore, I fully intend to lose some inches off my waistline and pounds off my frame. But other than that, I feel great."


Bush, 58, said it was clear he had just gone through a campaign after he stepped on the scale during his exam at the National Naval Medical Center in the Washington suburb of Bethesda, Maryland.


"I've obviously have gone through a campaign where I probably ate too many doughnuts, if you get my drift" he said. "My New Year's resolution has become apparent by getting on the scales."


The nearly 6-foot Bush weighs just shy of 200 pounds. His weight had crept up from 194 pounds at his last physical in August 2003.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=578&e=4&u=/nm/20041211/ts_nm/bush_health_dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. "superior health?" I'm not buying it
Edited on Sat Dec-11-04 09:02 PM by ailsagirl
There's nothing "superior" about him!! Except, perhaps, his knack for getting things WRONG.

Think about it-- everything he has gone near, he has destroyed. What a great guy. I can certainly see why the repugs love him so much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #54
62. He's blaming 6 pounds on the campaign?
For Crissakes, he weighed 194 a year before the campaign started. Typical. Bush blaming circumstances for his vices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #62
78. I think its all the Shiner Bock he's been drinking... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #54
77. Oh, great. I'll bet I know what that means.
More brush-clearing in Crawford. Yippee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coreystone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. This is an ABC (AP) release within the the last hour...
Link: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/print?id=321608


>snip

"I have interviewed and examined President George W. Bush and have reviewed his medical record," the doctors' statement said. "Within the scope of my specialty, I find him to be fit for duty and have every reasonable expectation that he will remain fit for duty for the duration of his presidency."

Presiding over the medical exam at the National Naval Medical Center outside Washington were White House physician Richard Tubb and Dr. Kenneth Cooper, the president of the Cooper Aerobics Center. Also involved were a radiologist, optometrist, sports physician, hearing specialist, skin specialist and cardiologist.

<end snip

Ok! What is the good doctor's specialty? What radiological tests were conducted? There is no indication by the article that any aspect of Bush's emotional/neurological condition was evaluated...

Hmm!



:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phillysuse Donating Member (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. Bush's physician
We have learned that he can probably see, hear, run, has a
heart that works (that's a surprise) and not too much skin cancer.

Interesting, for a man of a certain age, we have no idea if
his "equipment" works or if he had to invade Iraq because he was
feeling inadequate in that regard. No urology consultant.

Nor do we know anything about his brain function,
psychiatric medication use, sleep, or bowels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
41. None of them are chimp doctors
Very clever of them - "within the scope of my specialty" would only apply to human beings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #41
57. Yeh-- not a veterinarian in the bunch
How many doctors does it take to examine Bush??

(I wish I could think up a clever answer)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #57
66. Only one, if the chimp really wanted to be examined.
Like the old joke how many psychiatrists does it take to change a lightbulb. Only one, but that lightbulb really has to want to change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. Fit for duty...for me to POOP ON!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
18. "Fit for duty"?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amazona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
19. expect more free face peels at taxpayer expense
I'm sure the skin specialist will be certain to again certify Bush as having "pre-cancerous conditions" (in other words, has skin over age 40) so that he can get more of those free skin peels that are doing so much good...not.

More Botox, and less peels, would be my script since he has such bad reaction to the peels. But apparently peels are P.C. since they can be wishy-washed with the "precancerous lesions" excuse while Botox is upfront and honest about being a cosmetic procedure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
20. Oh goodie... now I can sleep at night
Anyone ever figure out what that wire gadget thing he wears is?

And if he's "fit for duty," let's ship him off to Iraq!! This brave, courageous man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. This must be
a whole new meaning of the term "fit for duty".

If they send a man without a brain to the Whitehouse will they be sending amputees back into combat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. The most bizarre statement I have ever read concerning
a physical

""Within the scope of my specialty, I find him to be fit for duty and have every reasonable expectation that he will remain fit for duty for the duration of his presidency."

:wtf:

Why are there always these type of caveats used when referring to the weed?

Possible Scenario:

Dr.: Well, I cannot say that he is fit for duty, I don't believe he is, he seems to be suffering from paranoia and his drug use, though prescribed, is worrisome."

Bushbot: Those things are outside of your specialty, you are not a psychiatrist and that was not the purpose of your examination. Is he physically healthy, did he pass his examines?

Dr.: Again, I really cannot say if he is truly fit, but physically he did pass the examines.

bushbot: Then you can say ""Within the scope of my specialty, I find him to be fit for duty and have every reasonable expectation that he will remain fit for duty for the duration of his presidency."

Dr.: I guess I can live with that, that would be a true statement.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. That has the ring of truth, merh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
61. I wonder if they are trying to get out of
examining him again if the 22 Amendment is overturned and * declares himself pResident for life. I wonder if these docs have family members at risk for a draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
24. Well, if he's 'fit for duty' , send him to Iraq.
Whatever happened to the old, old days when the Chief led the troops into battle, instead of hiding at a pig farm while they sweltered in the sand and died for his defense contractor buddies ?


:shrug:


:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
25. so what is his specialty?
And does he speak for the other specialists who examined Bush? Radiologist, cardiologist, etc.?

They're hiding something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevCheesehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
26. Yeah, right.
"...I find him to be fit for duty and have every reasonable expectation that he will remain fit for duty for the duration of his presidency."

For the next month and a half....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #26
46. LOL!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
28. What about his mental health screening? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
29. physical
They forgot to do the Cat scan, with his total eclipse of the brain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
31. Unfortunatly, I couldn't find what is considered "fitness" for office.
There does not seem to be any standard fitness tests for the office of pResident. In 2001, he had a neurological test series; this year, despite the numerous falls and fumbles he's exhibited, he doesn't have those tests listed.

No standard psychiatric testing - unlike what ICBM jockies need to go through to be able to stand duty.

Hey, it's not like he has his finger on any sort of Armageddon switch or anything like that...

Basically, it looks as if all he needs to do is to prove to anyone who may be concerned that 1) he's alive and 2) he'll be able to remain alive for the next four years without too much effort.

Of course, members of Congress and senior members of the Administration don't need to have any sort of standardized fitness test, either.

As a topic of discussion, should we as a country require some sort of standardized physical/mental fitness testing for our "leaders", elected or not? To protect the well-being of our society and insure we don't have a leadership where his/her fitness issues override the job we "hired" them to do?

Haele
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
32. "within the scope of my specialty .... i find him fit for duty......" were
there any psychiatrists signing their names unto this propagandistic declaration of good health and ability to carry on?

If so ... the American Psychiatric Association needs to review the psychiatrist's license and revoke it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no safe haven Donating Member (202 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
34. Is Elvis's doctor working for the WH now? n/t
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrbassman03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
35. Took awhile for the substances to get out of his blood...
His campaign energy powder... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danmel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
36. How do they know so soon that everything is fine?
When I get a physical I usually have to wait a few days for the results of blood work and toher diagnostic tests. What gives?

And he is really not fit for anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #36
58. Good question.
And, as is the assumption, he's here for the duration, why would he not need another physical for four years?? People his age need annual physicals.

The whole thing reeks. Again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
37. finding him to be "superior" .. on CNN they keep using that soundbite !
is this more media assited brainwashing?!?!
bush is superior being ....... do not question him....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #37
63. Next, they'll be wanting to clone him because of his "superior"
physique. Repugs will be lining up for Bush designer babies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
38. Fit for zip.
And certainly not for command.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
39. Cute!! "Fit for duty."
I think they were trying to one-up Kerry's "Reporting for duty." :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
40. a caller on the Guy James show just mentioned the fact that there
is no mention of a neurologist. We are to assume the MD's associated with Bush and in his employ, did a total neurolo9gical exam. I would think in view of his many accidents, his obvious symptoms during the debate, ie rapid blinking, drooping mouth, drooling and hyper-activity, would certainly be symptoms that demand a neurological exam

We know we cannot believe a thing coming from the White House. This is nothing but fluff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
42. Obviously there was no psychiatrist
examining him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #42
60. Or any other person with a background in ethical or moral behavior. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrightKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #42
67. What caused his apparent aphasia?
There might be some answers to that question that make him clearly unfit. Were there any organic mental disorders? Did he have a drug test?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qs04 Donating Member (60 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
43. "he will remain fit for duty for the duration of his presidency"
"So there's no need for subsequent checkups."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #43
55. My hubby caught that too
He's an internist, and he's mad that they tried to predict how he'll be in the future. No one can do that. There are no battery of tests that can decisively predict how any patient will do in the future--and if they're wrong, they could be sued for malpractice if he suffers harm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
44. No psychologist?
n/t:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. No veterinarian either
You would think the chimperor would have seen vet at least.




http://brainbuttons.com/home.asp?stashid=13
Buttons for brainy people - educate your local freepers today!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikepallas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
47. WTF !?!?! Why couldn't he do it 4 months ago? He had the powers
of the presidency behind him this bullshit about a heavy travel schedule is the worst excuse I EVER heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
49. Front line all the way baby!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pig. Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. yes FRONT LINE FRONT LINE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
59. An old friend had a heart attack after being declared "fit" by the Cooper
Aerobics Center. This was back in the mid 1980's. My friend had the full workup there, then had a heart attack within a few months. He got his medical records and showed them to his new cardiologist who said a blind man could have seen it coming. At least, this is what he told me, and I had no reason to not believe him as he was honest about his other health problems.

So much for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrightKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
64. rapid blood test results?
It did not take them very long to get and evaluate the results of his blood tests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Bone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
68. Latrine Duty ? maybe
Not sure I would want him doing anything else. Make sure his brush is fully armored though. And that he has a working gas mask. Unlike the soldiers he send to Iraq.

Hope everyone who voted for him gets EXACTLY what they voted for. I hope they all get it shoved and twisted uop their ass so far their eyes pop out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villagechild Donating Member (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
70. the war president
fit for duty. he makes me vomit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
71. So. Has anyone checked to see if this
has been posted on the White House website yet?

As I wrote farther up in this thread, only his 2001 results were ever actually posted. There are NO summations for 2002 and 2003. I am highly suspicious that he had physicals in those years. If he did, some results were not good. They chose not to publish an official summation, crossing fingers no one would notice, rather than take a chance on releasing statements which might someday prove to be blatantly false with regard to his health.

Ahem.

I think I'll go check the website now.

Nope. Nothing. Will check tomorrow and the next day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
72. Also, in 2001, he had a neurologist as part of the examining team.
Dr. Thomas James DeGraba, M.D.
Director,
Clinical Stroke Research Unit, Stroke Branch
National Institute of
Neurologic Disorder and Stroke

Also in 2001, the following types of doctors examined him:

Gastroenterologist, Optometrist, the team doctor for the Washington Capitals (???), an audiologist, a dermatologist, an otolaryngologist, a cardiologist, an oncologist, and a podiatrist.

It was all supervised by the same guys as this time, Tubb and Cooper.

See more details here: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/08/20010804-2.html

Remember, this is the 2001 physical. No other summation for other years has ever been released.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villagechild Donating Member (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #72
73. the memory hole
keeps eating his service records!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #73
74. I know!
Except that his 2002 and 2003 physical summations would have had to have been posted in the first place in order for them to be eaten by the memory hole!

I wish some journalist somewhere had the balls to ask where the official summations are for 2002, 2003 and for that matter, this year's "physical."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villagechild Donating Member (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #74
75. wake the dead

There's still chickenhawk's missing annual service medical exam in 1972.

memory hole: Chimps military records.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #75
76. You know
that's a good point. His military medical records and a lot of his regular military records are also AWOL.

The more time goes on, the more I am convinced he has a moderately serious medical/health issue.

And they are doing their best to hide it but it's getting harder and harder.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC