Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: U.S. Officials Knew of AIDS Drug Risks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Moloch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 07:46 PM
Original message
AP: U.S. Officials Knew of AIDS Drug Risks
WASHINGTON - Weeks before President Bush (news - web sites) announced a plan to protect African babies from AIDS (news - web sites), top U.S. health officials were warned that research on the key drug was flawed and may have underreported severe reactions including deaths, government documents show.

The 2002 warnings about the drug, nevirapine, were serious enough to suspend testing for more than a year, let Uganda's government know of the dangers and prompt the drug's maker to pull its request for permission to use the medicine to protect newborns in the United States.

But the National Institutes of Health (news - web sites), the government's premier health research agency, chose not to inform the White House as it scrambled to keep its experts' concerns from scuttling the use of nevirapine in Africa as a cheap solution, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press.

"Everyone recognized the enormity that this decision could have on the worldwide use of nevirapine to interrupt mother-baby transmission," NIH's AIDS research chief, Dr. Edmund C. Tramont, reported March 14, 2002, to his boss, Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (news - web sites).

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&e=6&u=/ap/20041214/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_aids_drug
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ivolsky Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Alarming
The story is alarming, especially the claim (later on in the article) that the drug manufacturer attempted to suppress information from the FDA so that the drug would be approved for domestic use.

more: www.politicalthought.net
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh hell, what's the big deal? A few (hundred, thousand, million???)
lives in exchange for money in the drug industry's pockets?

Where are your priorities?

<sarcasm off>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC