Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Federal Agency Disputes (The) Pill's Benefits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 02:39 AM
Original message
Federal Agency Disputes (The) Pill's Benefits
Federal officials Wednesday backed away from the findings of two major studies on birth control pills, saying the research was flawed and that a new analysis shows there is no evidence that oral contraceptives cut the risk of heart disease.

The research, presented at a medical meeting in October, created a stir because it was from the nation's largest women's health study and found that women on the pill had lower risks of heart disease and no increased risk of breast cancer. That was contrary to what many previous studies had found.

But Dr. Barbara Alving of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, which funds and oversees the women's health study, said the work by researchers from Wayne State University in Detroit had not been reviewed by the study's leaders or the government before it was presented.

A new analysis by senior statisticians determined that the heart findings were flawed and that the breast cancer findings now also are suspect.

http://www.newsday.com/news/health/wire/sns-ap-the-pill,0,4486524.story?coll=sns-ap-health-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 04:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Baby steps towards eliminating birth control.
Just watch and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Take it easy. All this is saying is that a study that

claimed to show birth control pills may be good for women's hearts is flawed. There have been many studies of birth control pills over the past forty-odd years; some have shown them to have positive health effects, others have them to have negative health effects.

In the Seventies, feminists often argued against use of the pill because of allegations of it causing strokes and heart attacks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dem2theMax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. We know what it 'says.' We're just counting on the consistency of this
morally bankrupt administration. Gotta think like them so we can plan ahead. Have I mentioned lately that I'm going :crazy:?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Vigilance is great, and necessary. I just don't want to

overreact to ordinary news, which is how I see this. YMMV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. No why don't you *take it easy?*
In previous posts you've made the absurd and patently false accusations that the pill is an abortifacient and that its widespread use has caused an upswing in women mutilating their babies. You'd get right on board with any study that found fault with the pill because you are quite obviously biased against it. Get real.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I've never made any such claims. The pill is not

intended as an abortefacient though there is some evidence that it may, rarely, cause early spontaneous abortion of embryos conceived while the mother is "on the pill." I would have to have a lot more evidence of a lot more spontaneoua abortions caused by the pill before I'd change my mind that the pill is an effective contraceptive that's safe for most women. I'd support the pill for any woman who wanted to use it and was one of the early users myself.

I am opposed to abortion, euthanasia, the death penalty, and war, also murder, but not to women and not to contraception.

Women mutilating their children because of the pill? Sorry, I don't know what you're talking about there.

:shrug:

If you read my post again, I merely pointed out that the report was simply saying that previously reported "good news" of some health benefit of the pill (apart from its effectiveness as a contraceptive) has been found to result from a flawed study. That doesn't mean the pill is now "bad" for women.

I have plenty of paranoia about some people in high places these days but I don't think they want to outlaw contraceptives -- or abortion, for that matter. They'll talk anti-abortion and pro-family talk to solidify their right-wing Christian base, just as Leo Strauss would tell them to, but they have no use for a population increase in the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. You're wrong.
There are at least two senators presently in office who have gone on public record as opposing all forms of birth control. One from Oklahoma, the other I seem to associate with Pennsylvania.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dem2theMax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. Boy, what does this say about me and this country?
When I read the title of the thread, I immediately thought that the report was going to tell us that birth control pills do not prevent pregnancy -- and that they were going to be taken off the market.
I mean, I wouldn't put it past * and his house of ill repute (read 'RW fundies') to do something like that.

I think I need a vacation. Somewhere FAR away like Europe.
Think I'll stay for at least the next four years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Don't feel so bad
Those were my first thoughts as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dem2theMax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't know whether to laugh or cry.
Probably both. Then go get drunk? Wanna join me?

Where ARE the aliens when you need them? I wanna go live on another planet! I'm going :crazy: here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 04:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Drink away...
I'll just have a errrr...smoke or two.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dem2theMax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 04:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Hey, if I bring the munchies,
can I skip the drink and join you?

I hate hangovers. lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 04:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Sure!
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. I don't think the people in power now want a baby boom.

They'd rather import cheap labor, or outsource jobs. People having large families is not really part of their plans. I think they'd prefer a smaller population than we have now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dem2theMax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. But didn't we get a 'list' a few weeks ago that said in part ,
'women, get pregnant and stay pregnant!'
Can't have single folk. We all have to marry. Can't have married folk without children. We all have to breed. Remember that post? LOL.

They may not want a baby boom, but they aren't doing anything to stop one. They are doing everything they can (so far) to stop us from NOT having children. Thank God I'm too old to 'breed.' Well, I'm not. But I say I am, so there, *.

They'll get that smaller population if they keep pissing off other countries. One big :nuke: is all it will take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Hmm, I must have missed that memo. You say we all

have to breed? Are they planning mandatory pregnancy tests? Mandatory reverse vasectomies? Uterine transplants for women who've had hysterectomies? No doubt they'll give free health care for pregnant women and young children - hahahahahha!

Seriously, I'm more concerned about them reducing the population by sending all the young, and many of the old, men off to endless war, and killing off the elderly and disabled by cutting their benefits and screwing up so we have no flu vaccines and other needed immunizations (like,say, smallpox.) SMALLPOX :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. I read an article about "deliberate childlessness" not long ago
How some Christian (read: fundie) groups are taking up the sword against married people who choose not to procreate -- it's against God's law. Married couples should accept "as many children as God gives them."

My husband made a point about large families -- if you have one, it severely limits your options. You HAVE to accept that lousy job, or work two or more, because your situation demands it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Exactly
Edited on Thu Dec-16-04 11:25 AM by Mandate My Ass
When they're scrambling for crumbs, the engineered underclass is not likely to pick up the torches and pitchforks against their overlords.

It's all about preventing upward mobility and devaluing labor. Social stratification inhibits and even prevents liberal reform. And since there will be no social safety net, they don't care if people are starving or dying from lack of health care. What matters is that those who survive will fight for the opportunity to work for slave wages without benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
13. I thought their prime function was to prevent pregnancy?
Here it comes, get ready, all you Handmaidens...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wovenpaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
17. Planting those seeds of "doubt"
To all the young people out there - keep vigilant!!!
It's easy to take reproductive rights for granted now, but things will be waaaaaaaaaaaaay different if things are turned around. A lot of hard work (understatement) went into obtaining these rights, so now it's your turn to keep up the fight.
Why, oh why, can't they attend to their OWN business -that's my mini rant for today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
18. You can't put your faith in anything this government says unless your a
fundie.

I would not believe anything Bushco's government says about medical issues because there right wing agenda is more important than scientific fact. I get my news from overseas and I will get my scientific information there too. I trust nothing this county says anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC