Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UK Keeps Terror Suspects in Jail, Despite Judgement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 11:51 AM
Original message
UK Keeps Terror Suspects in Jail, Despite Judgement
reuters
Thu Dec 16, 2004 11:38 AM ET


By Andrew Cawthorne and Michael Holden

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain's top court delivered a severe jolt to Prime Minister Tony Blair's post-Sept. 11 security policies on Thursday by ruling against the detention of nine foreign terrorism suspects without trial.

The British government, Washington's chief ally in its "war on terror," said it would send the controversial law under which the Muslim men are held back to parliament.

But it refused to release the nine -- one of whom is accused of inspiring the Sept. 11 U.S. attacks -- for security reasons.

The Law Lord judges ruled 8-1 in favor of the men whose imprisonment under draconian anti-terror laws, some for as long as three years, has become a cause celebre for rights activists who call their predicament "Britain's Guantanamo Bay."

http://reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=MB2KMCJF5EXYECRBAELCFEY?type=worldNews&storyID=7115584

Expect major repercussions for Poodle this weekend after this jinxed ruling....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. How many flight simulator program developers also inspired 9/11?
All of those games which allow accidental crashes into buildings or those nice shoot-em-ups?

Just how far does this "You may have inspired 9/11 so we're going to lock you up forever" go if there's no evidence? If there is evidence, it's a different matter of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. "You are alleged to have said something that we didn't like"
One of the original reasons why the indefinite detention rule was
allowed was to allow the police/whoever a bit more time to discover
enough evidence to prosecute - i.e., the normal "assisting the police
with their enquiries" period wasn't seen to be long enough with respect
to terrorist acts. Unfortunately, other people seem to have jumped
with joy at the thought that not only did it not extend that period by
a *finite* amount, it defeated the point of obtaining any evidence for
the alleged crimes as the defendants could be detained until such time
as they were no longer wanted. Why waste time on a trial when you can
just keep your targets under lock & key without one?

Frightening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC