Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Branson planned Mandela mission to prevent Iraq war

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 10:20 AM
Original message
Branson planned Mandela mission to prevent Iraq war
http://news.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=1445592004

<snip>

The Virgin chief reportedly wanted to send Mr Mandela to meet with tyrant Saddam Hussein to persuade him to go into exile.

The aim was for the former South African leader to fly out of Baghdad with Saddam in tow.

Multi-millionaire tycoon Sir Richard even got approval for the plan from United Nations secretary general Kofi Annan, despite fears the Nobel Peace Prize winner might be kidnapped. Sir Richard, who was prepared to go to Iraq with Mr Mandela, believed the war could be prevented if Saddam was given an escape route - but coalition forces invaded Iraq before his plan was able to proceed.

Sir Richard said: "I kept thinking, you have to give somebody like Saddam a way out otherwise he’s like a cornered animal - they have to fight. I thought the only person who could persuade him to step down was Mandela.

"Mandela wanted us to get Kofi Annan’s blessing, which we got. We were arranging for Mandela to go to Iraq to meet Saddam and had a plane standing by in Johannesburg from March 17.

"Two days later, as we were planning to fly in, the bombing started, so it didn’t come to anything."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
theophilus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Who knows, it might have worked. It is too bad that our great leader
didn't try such diplomacy. Maybe if he had offered Saddam a fraction of the "capital" that has been expended in this great fiasco a more peaceful end could have been reached. We'll never know.

"What Might Have Been...."


(Of course WAR is exactly what Spurious George and his henchmen craved.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fir Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. If only, if only, if only
I'm persuaded that nothing was going to delay Bush from his objective(to have war with Iraq).

It is hind sight now and so much is lost already. That we went to a pre-emptive war is insane.

That is what determined stupidity will do for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Yep, even if Saddam and his spawn had left Iraq...
... Bush still would have rationalized going in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. Saddam wouldn't have left. Still, I wish this had been tried.
Edited on Sat Dec-18-04 10:40 AM by Ready4Change
I've respect for Mandela, and from what I've seen Branson is admirable. However, I think it's naive to think they could have pried Saddam out of Iraq. Inside Iraq he was a King, nearly a god. Outside he would have been just another rich, ex-petty dictator. He also would have been outside his extensive personal security structure, which would have made him extremely vulnerable to many entities who (still) want him dead.

However, I wish they had been given time to try this, and other diplomatic methods. Not because I think they had a chance of working. I think it would have given our later actions greater legitimacy, or would have given people time to realize that Saddam was well contained and not an immediate threat.

However, it's all spilt milk.

(Edited for awkward wording.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Actually, it was mentioned at the time that serious negotiations were in
Edited on Sat Dec-18-04 10:45 AM by blm
the works from a few directions and that there was a very good chance Saddam would comply.

Saddam knew he didn't have the weapons and the miltary to face down the US in a war. The guy was crazy but, never stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. Not bad for a guy who started by selling records out of his car
Sounds like responsible corporate stewardship and a real world vision.

Good for you Richard wish it had come together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kerry said many times Bush rushed the invasion and stated that plans
were in the works to negotiate regime change PEACEFULLY without a military invasion.

The GOP and the talking heads mocked him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. they also mocked the 200 billion dollar war cost
that Kerry kept stating.  Now even the talking heads are using
that figure. What a strategy - mock the messenger until the
truth can't be kept secret anymore and then act as though it
is "old news".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasBushwhacker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. But then Iraq would have just plunged into civil war
and Bush would have still invaded because of those mysterious WMD's and of course, to protect American interests in Iraq, spelled O I L. I appreciate Branson trying to do something, but he either doesn't realize, or just isn't saying, the truth. Bush wanted to go to war with Iraq - PERIOD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kinkistyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
9. We'd STILL be in a freaking Quagmire.
Either way, Saddam is out of power. Getting rid of Saddam was the EASY part - it always WAS.

The reason why we are where we are now is that Saddam's brutal dictatorship kept a lid on the boilerpot that is Iraq and now its our mess to deal with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. Wow, who knew? I'm glad he tried, i'm sorry it didn't work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. I wonder if Bush would have held back or used the opportunity
to whack Mandela, too. Cheney and Bush Daddy were no friends of Mandela.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hopein08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. Too bad Branson's British...
He's seems to have the right ideas about diplomacy on top of running a good business. Otherwise, he'd make a good president. On the other hand, he wants his daughter to marry Prince William so there's that! LOL!

Plus, his show is more exciting than Trump's:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. it wouldn't have mattered
Edited on Sat Dec-18-04 06:56 PM by JI7
it was never about Saddam himself. but Branson is a good man for trying or considering. his intentions were/are good. and i will look towards his businesses in the future if i ever want to buy something he sells.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Correct. The neoCONs were going to do this no matter what.
I, too, appreciate such intentions.

Perhaps, had this endeavor along with a Papal presence been realized,...the neoCONs would have been delayed,...but, not stopped. The neoCONs would have simply waited and/or removed such obstructions.

Nevertheless,...thoughts count? Now, we must move towards greater cause and ACTION.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. NOTHING would have changed.
bush would still have invaded & occupied Iraq, and the Iraqi people would still resist the invasion & occupation.

Nothing whatsoever would have changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
17. I have to take issue with the majority position, here.
I think this could have worked. At the very least, it would have exposed America's imperialist designs. It would have demonstrated conclusively that Saddam Hussein's totalitarian government was not the real reason America invaded.

Imagine what the situation would be if Saddam were under UN custody in Belgium right now. Would the US continue to claim that it intended to hold "free" election soon? Would the US risk having Saddam Hussein win a legitimate election? If Saddam won, quite obviously, he would throw out all American troops. He would go to the World Court and bring charges against the leaders of the US for an unjust invasion, given that there were, obviously, no WMDs. The US would have to leave--or risk world war.

Perhaps Bush knew that there was a plan to get Saddam out of Iraq, and perhaps that explains why we rushed to war when we did, poorly armed and without a real plan. Surely Bush would know that his invasion would be useless if Saddam were elected legitimately and American forces were then compelled to leave. Perhaps he would not have attacked at all.

just a thought ...

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
18. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
19. Bush would have invaded no matter what
That was his intention from the start. Nothing would have changed his mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC