Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Legal Advice On ID Cards Kept Secret/Guardian--UK

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 10:35 PM
Original message
Legal Advice On ID Cards Kept Secret/Guardian--UK

From the new World Media Watch, up now at http://www.zianet.com/insightanalytical

Tomorrow at Buzzflash.com


1//The Guardian, UK Monday December 20, 2004

http://www.guardian.co.uk/idcards/story/0,15642,1377360,00.html



LEGAL ADVICE ON ID CARDS KEPT SECRET

David Hencke, Westminster correspondent

The government has banned the release of advice given by Lord Goldsmith, the attorney general, to cabinet ministers on whether the controversial bill to introduce ID cards for 55 million British citizens will invade people's privacy or human rights.


The disclosure comes as ministers today face a revolt from Labour MPs and opposition politicians over plans to introduce ID cards. MPs will today be asked to accept a blanket assurance from the former home secretary, David Blunkett, that "the provisions of the identity cards bill are compatible with the European convention of human rights".



The Guardian has learned that parliament's joint committee on human rights, which will scrutinise the bill, has yet to pronounce on safeguards and will not get direct access to the documents.



Lord Goldsmith's advice to ministers is known to contain detailed arguments about whether people's rights would be infringed if they were denied access to public services and closely argued points about the powers of the security services, the police, and other authorities to access details of people's medical history, finances and personal details.



The documents would also include a frank assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the bill. Normally some information is provided about legal discussions in a public memorandum with the bill - but in this case it appears to have been confined to one sentence.



(MORE)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gandalf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's good. Too much transparency hurts democracy
No reason why the parliament's committee responsible for the job should get access to all this unnecessary information...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC