Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Ethics Panel Chief May Be Replaced

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 11:34 PM
Original message
House Ethics Panel Chief May Be Replaced
House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert is leaning toward removing the House ethics committee chairman, who admonished House Majority Leader Tom DeLay this fall and has said he will treat DeLay like any other member, several Republican aides said yesterday.

Although Hastert (Ill.) has not made a decision, the expectation among leadership aides is that the chairman, Rep. Joel Hefley (R-Colo.), long at odds with party leaders because of his independence, will be replaced when Congress convenes next week.

The aides said a likely replacement is Rep. Lamar S. Smith, one of DeLay's fellow Texans, who held the job from 1999 to 2001. Smith wrote a check this year to DeLay's defense fund. An aide said Smith was favored for his knowledge of committee procedure.
...
The effort by DeLay and his allies to preserve his leadership post, even if he faces criminal charges, is one of the most sensitive issues facing Republicans as the new Congress begins. If Hefley is replaced by Smith, it is another signal by House leaders that they will stand by DeLay. "It certainly seems they're circling the wagons," said a GOP staff member who declined to be identified.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A32307-2004Dec28.html?nav=rss_politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Having Joel Hefley In Charge Of Ethics in the House....
Edited on Wed Dec-29-04 12:48 AM by CO Liberal
...makes about as much sense as when they had Al DaMato in charge of it in the Senate. Might as well put Kobe Bryant in charge of a chastity crusade.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Willy Wonka Donating Member (283 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Amen.
I hate the Helmet-Hair that we call Hefley around here..


:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Yet even he didn't pass muster for proper corruption
The gloves are off now, and the discipline among the forces of evil will get ever stricter. Perhaps they'll overreach. Then again, perhaps they'll overreach and really not get knocked back down that far.

Boldness is the hallmark of their strategy, and we should expect them to continue. Meanwhile, Jim McDermott must be pilloried as Tom DeLay trips the light fantastic...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. Or as much sense as placing Cheney in charge of Halliburton contracts
Oh, he was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. Lawmakers think the job is "undesirable"
snip>
Hefley took the job reluctantly, and the post is considered undesirable among lawmakers. Hefley represents Colorado Springs, home to more than 20 evangelical organizations, including Focus on the Family, the large Christian enterprise run by James Dobson.
..............

Very rich- he doesn't want to hold his colleagues accountable to the "values" of his constituents....For just this reason! Doing the job at ALL (one weak letter that danced around the edges of the truth) put his power at risk.

The repub govt is corrupt to its core.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. why even have the ethics panel
they don't do squat about real violations except for sweeping them under the rug

how disgusting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Unless it involves a democrat. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. They need an ethics panel
To dig up ridiculous 10 year old nonissues for every Democrat in the House!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manly Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. The House Ethics hahahahahahahahahaha committee
Why bother? It is clear that the ethics of our elected congressional saints are virtually sin-free. To quote the article: the House ethics committee announced an investigation into a Democrat's release of the transcript of a secretly recorded 1997 telephone conversation among GOP leaders concerning then-Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.). It is the committee's first new inquiry in nine months.
Please note that last sentence. Nine months without a single potential besmirchment! Fantastic! And that includes the election shenanigans. What a country!
Of course, we're not counting george bush, who was out at the ranch, pretending to be Clint Eastwood.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. This is not necessarily a bad thing.
The more of these evil bastards that are drawn into the circle, the more of them there will be to fall, when the center collapses under its unethical weight. Like Watergate, it will take them all down at once.

Well, I can hope, can't I?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. Why don't the just
put Tom DeLay in charge of the Ethics Committee?

Might as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. Aren't political ethics an oxymoron anyway? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsMagnificent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. Pigs. All pigs
"No question now, what had happened to the faces of the pigs. The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which."

--Animal Farm, George Orwell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
15. This is the boldest most disgusting misuse of partisan power yet.
You will now begin to see the destruction of any Dem who so much as sneezes incorrectly but the most corrupt of the Republicans will walk free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC