Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Guidelines for treating rape victims omit emergency contraception

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:31 PM
Original message
Guidelines for treating rape victims omit emergency contraception
http://www.billingsgazette.com/index.php?id=1&display=rednews/2004/12/31/build/nation/80-rape-victims.inc

December 31, 2004

Guidelines for treating rape victims omit emergency contraception
Knight Ridder News

-snips-

PHILADELPHIA - The U.S. Department of Justice has issued its first-ever medical guidelines for treating sexual assault victims - without any mention of emergency contraception, the standard precaution against pregnancy after rape. The omission of the so-called morning-after pill has frustrated and angered victims' advocates and medical professionals who have long worked to improve victims' care.

Lynn Schollet, a lawyer with the Illinois Coalition Against Sexual Assault, said without emergency contraception, the trauma of rape could be compounded by an unplanned pregnancy. "It is very unfortunate to set forth a model national standard that is not giving women the best care available,'' Schollet said.

The Pennsylvania chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union is now collecting signatures on a petition urging the Justice Department to fix the "glaring omission in an otherwise thorough document.'' In the half-page on pregnancy "risk evaluation and care,'' the protocol says to take victims' pregnancy fears "seriously,'' give a pregnancy test, and "discuss treatment options, including reproductive health services.''

Advocates point out that emergency contraception, which is nothing more than high-dose birth control pills, reduces the chance of pregnancy 75 to 90 percent - but only if taken within 72 hours of unprotected sex. "This narrow window of effectiveness makes timely access to emergency contraception critical,'' declares the petition.

The risk of pregnancy after rape is small - less than 5 percent - but the vulnerable group is large. Of 333,000 sexual assaults and rapes reported in 1998, about 25,000 resulted in pregnancies - of which 22,000 could have been prevented, estimated Princeton University population researcher James Trussell.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. can you imagine getting pregnant by a rapist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. The 'Nazis' war on women continues! I hate these fools!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. the other thing I don't notice is treatment for venereal disease and
AIDS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. released on new years eve to lessen impact...don't let this disappear

women should be screaming outside the White House and Congress about this 'TALIBAN' control of women's rights, especially after being assaulted by rape.....

bush* and his cabal are CRIMINALS.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AFSCME girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. KICK!!!!!!!
Remember ladies, as Bushco is chipping away at our rights, Hell hath no fury......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Those phuckers! Why was this only picked up by a small paper in MT?
Edited on Fri Dec-31-04 06:42 PM by joeybee12
I haven't seen this anywhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. duplicate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC