Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Bush Immigration Plan Meets GOP Opposition

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-05 10:54 PM
Original message
WP: Bush Immigration Plan Meets GOP Opposition
Lawmakers Resist Temporary-Worker Proposal

President Bush's plan to liberalize the nation's immigration laws to allow millions of undocumented workers the opportunity for legal status appears to be on a collision course with newly aroused sentiment among House Republicans pushing for a crackdown on illegal immigration.

Bush describes his immigration proposal as one of the top goals of his second term, calling it a humane way to get a handle on the nation's mushrooming illegal immigration problem. Republican strategists, led by White House chief political adviser Karl Rove, also see the proposal as an important element in their plan to expand the party's base among the nation's fast-growing Hispanic population.

The key prong in Bush's plan is a temporary-worker program that would offer the nation's estimated 10 million illegal immigrants a chance to earn legal status that would allow them to stay in the country as long as six years. Once they register as temporary workers, they would be eligible to begin the long process of applying for citizenship or permanent residency.

"It's a compassionate way to treat people who come to our country. It recognizes the reality of the world in which we live," Bush said during a news conference last week. "There are some people -- there are some jobs in America that Americans won't do and others are willing to do."

But an increasingly vocal group of House Republicans is threatening to undercut Bush's vision, which the president has discussed with passion but has not formally advanced since taking office in 2001. Many House Republicans oppose any effort to grant legal status to undocumented workers, saying it would have the effect of rewarding law-breakers. Instead, they are seeking to ratchet up enforcement efforts against undocumented workers, an approach with proven voter appeal if unproven results when it comes to slowing illegal immigration.

more…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A41340-2005Jan1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-05 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. "...which the president has discussed with passion but has not formally
advanced since taking office in 2001." (last paragraph quoted above)

In other words, he has DECEIVED THE AMERICAN PEOPLE about this just as he has lied about everything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hansolsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-05 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. There is dignity in all work and no jobs Americans won't do. This is just
one more Orwellian lie from King George. The guest worker program is a poor substitute for legalizing the present level of immigration.

A guest worker program would guarantee that employers can pay these immigrants slave wages, thus pulling down all wages for unskilled labor and blue color jobs.

The great lie here is these slave laborors will do jobs no American wants. That is false. These 10 million immigrants are allready working at every level in the economy and are heavily concentrated in construction jobs coveted by every union member in the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-05 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. True, you just can't beat a terrified illegal worker if you want to save
money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-05 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I Presume
Your reference is to a fellow named Charles Dickens?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
30. corp cronyies have been waiting on this for some time now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-05 11:25 PM
Original message
Not only slave labor
Also, now he can have the illegal aliens enlist to fight his wars.

His compassion is touching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-05 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Absolutely.
Edited on Sat Jan-01-05 11:59 PM by TahitiNut
Maybe they'll give them 3/5ths of a vote? (They only get 2/5ths of the value of their labor.) We'll count 'em as 3/5ths of a person for Census purposes. There's also the question of Social Security, but it's abundantly clear this is another battle in the War Against Labor.

"Aw, shucks. Here I am an agribusiness with millions of acres I can't move to China like my buddies moved their plants. What am I to do? If they actually close the borders, I'm screwed. I got it! Just keep doing the same thing but change the law to make my criminal practices legal! That's how it worked in the good ol' slave days."


When organized crime stopped bribing the cops and bought the guys who write the laws, they legalized crime and criminalized honest labor. Cheaper is better, in both labor and bribes. Cheaper to bribe 100 legislators $50,000 each than 10,000 cops for $1,000 each. Cops can't arrest you for breaking a law that doesn't exist.

The GOP: making crime legal for the wealthy. (Next movie: "The GOPfather")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Judged Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. * meant, but omitted to add: "at $2.00 per hour and w/o benefits!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barkley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-05 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. More (immigrant) troops in Iraq?
Do legal residents applying for full citizenship get fast track processing if they enroll in the military?

I read that about 40,000 (of the 1.5 million) of all US soldiers are not US citizens.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-05 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I guess if we post the same thing
Whoever phrased it best gets the post #, eh?

*looks at my poor numberless post*

*sobs*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
29. Maybe we should have our military soldiers outsourced. lol eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-05 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. This is the perfect issue to split the republicans
What can we do to help? Shall we fan the fires on both sides?

After this is done, I hope that no hispanic with half a brain ever votes republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Yes! You are so right!
Even in the heat of pre-election discussions, I noticed that when a Bush cultist was absolutely intent on defending Bush, all I had to do was say something like, "Fine... oh, and be sure to learn to speak Spanish, y'hear?" That's when I could see all the air go out of the sails of even his most diehard supporters.

(Incidentally, I have so far felt indifferent to whether or not there are Mexican illegals, or legal immigrants, living/working in my area. I am sort of open to both sides of this issue.) Most strong Bush supporters are absolutely infuriated by the fact that Bush is letting "illegal immigrants" stay in the country, and "take over" and is even talking of granting amnesty so they'll never leave! Good! Let them stew in it for a while. It was clear long before the election that Bush wasn't going to slam the borders shut--so how stupid did these people have to BE to vote for him anyway?? (The same people, of course, are supremely unconcerned about the fraudulent Iraq war, the corporate rape of the US and of Iraq, etc....)

The truth: the Bush cultists who rail about "illegal immigrants" are REALLY concerned about ALL immigrants who are not of the same race as they are. They just SAY they are "against illegals". They are actually against ALL of them. Their complaints against "illegal immigrants" are code for their real feelings, which are: "I don't want any more non-whites in this country". Bush cultists are shortsighted, provincial-minded idiots, of limited intelligence--just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Child_Of_Isis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Republicans may despise the non-white, BUT,
they also see them as a status symbol. You know you have arrived when you have one to clean your house, do your yard work, and one to care for your children. And then comes the bragging rights. About how it all only costs pennies a day. I can only imagine how many shrubfucko has at 'the ranch'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Actually, you have only really arrived when you find a white to do this
I've heard the real status symbol in the Chicago area is to have illegal Polish household help instead of Hispanics.

Of course you are right about owning slaves as a status symbol - I bet it worked that way in the 19th century too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. Yes--it's pathetic.
Let them sit smugly and imagine themselves to be some sort of ruling class. They wouldn't be the first "ruling class" that was taken down, wayyy down!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. I agree. Democrats need to exploit this.
Not only will it create a huge rift within the republican party, it also will reveal some of the true nature of the ugliest hate mongering bigotry the GOP relies on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. 10 million Immigrants and they get to vote MexiUSA soon!!!
that will tilt the balance to making us a predominantly Spanish speaking nation... This of all his plans is the most fascinating to me of all. But clearly its to bring cheap workers but actually these are not cheap workers. thats whats so puzzling!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. They are perceived to be (comparatively) cheap workers, and
our business people really, really want to sell them stuff. You should hear all the good ol' boy businesses running ads in Spanish on the local Mexican/Spanish-speaking stations. Makes me laugh every time I hear it. I bet a lot of these car lot owners and real estate people voted for Bush and think he will preserve their status quo (in which they fancy themselves the ruling class)--yet these same people are literally kissing the feet of the immigrants to get them in to their businesses to spend money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordout Donating Member (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
23. also predominantly roman catholic
and the 'king of the holy roman empire' visited crawford recently..


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AstronautGirl7 Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. I know what you mean....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OutsourceBush Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. This issue must tie the Repukes in knots
On the one hand they want cheep labor. On the other hand they hate anyone non-white.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
11. Maybe if we drastically cut *'s salary, we could find an immigrant
to do it for him. I suspect the immigrant would do as well, also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_DeLeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
15. I sort of agree with Bush on this...
I dont know the specifics of his plan, that being said thats probably what is most wrong with his plan the specificis.

We definately need to allow more legal immigration from Mexico. The US and Mexico need to be more connected, it is something that would benefit us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
16. Looks like the Republicans will form their own opposition party, since
the Democrats (other than Rep. Conyers & his group)seemed to have fallen off the face of the earth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
17. GOP desire for stoop labor vs. GOP bigotry/xenophobia
Should be fun to watch.

I'm just going to grab my popcorn, sit back, and watch them eat their own over this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Sorta lets the "base" see which is really his base... big biz or social
conservatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
20. this allows them
to drop the standards for jobs on US citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. keep the opposition acoming!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sistersofmercy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
25. I agree with Bush on this issue
I don't care if it's done in some measure for political purposes (what isn't?), to gain favor with the hispanic voters etc, it's a very good thing imo and it should have been done long before now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. That's fine. But do you agree with Bush being your president?
I sort of lean in the direction you expressed. But I do NOT agree with Bush as president! So my personal feelings (whether he's doing the right thing with his so-called amnesty plan) don't matter. What I want to do is to use the huge disagreement on this issue to drive a big wedge between his Stepford-wife-like supporters. This is one issue on which his "base" disagrees with him. Good! May they tear him to pieces (figuratively speaking) over it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC