Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC cover page picked up WP: Uranium cut out in Oct. story!!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Room101 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 01:12 AM
Original message
MSNBC cover page picked up WP: Uranium cut out in Oct. story!!!!
I;m waiting for the other whores to pick it up!

http://www.msnbc.com/news/default.asp?0ct=-34e

DRIP DRIP DRIP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
classics Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. GUSH GUSH GUSH
This thing is blowing wide open... I think his own party is going to eat him over this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
study_war_no_more Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
20. This is just the beginning
LIHOP is coming over the hill like a big black bear heading straight for the bull!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Augspies Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nah...drip, drip, DRIP is over
It is now Pound, POUND, POUND..., as in the one more nail in the coffin of this corrupt administration.

This means that the Media is not going to take Friday's bait, and that means that its time for Bush to send Condi out for the extra tube of K-Y; because, this admin and everyone in it is F***ED.


Jeremy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think this is a good thing, no a great thing, but....
why is everyone concentrating on just one lie? There are about 450 proven lies by this Administration. Why aren't they being pounced on? NOW is the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
absolutezero Donating Member (879 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Just like Watergate
This will snowball....the whole bunch of bullshit....They lied to many times and the corporate media, with lower rating after the war needs more viewers...if that means turning on commander bunnypants then so be it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Equinox Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
34. It's not happening soon enough...
this admin has gotten away with so much under the pretense of PATRIOTISM. They'll invent new stuff to get them out of this mess. Our media is a joke. They are run by the same corporations that keeps this admins approval ratings high. It's our countries baby steps to Fascism via propaganda and fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
26. Be thankful that the focus is negative.
The press can (maybe) manage to stay focused on one lie for a while. 200 or 400 lies is 'way beyond the cognitive overload point for any of the so-called journalists pursuing the trade today. (And I say "pursuing" the trade because none of them have caught it yet.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #26
37. Opps - just missed the window of opportunity - comming up "the Kobi Briant
Affiar".

Looks like they have their distractions in place already!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
38. Don't worrry all the lies will be exposed
*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
58. Start with one lie
The biggest hurdle is to get the public to stop deluding themselves that Bush is incapable of lying. After that point, people will be far more receptive to the facts about all of the hundreds of other lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Punkingal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. sounds like....
Mr. Cheney was really pushing this....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. I love this part
“The information was available within the system that should have caught this kind of big mistake,” a former Bush administration official said. “The question is how the management of the system, and the process that supported it, allowed this kind of misinformation to be used and embarrass the president.”

heh heh Wonder who THAT might be.....? ;-)

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indictrichardperle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Lets see ?
hmmmmm ? would it be a dick with ears, who lies alot ?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. could be...
not sure really, suspects abound. ;-) That should whip the Freepers into a frenzie eh? haha

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. Well, as Deep Throat said during Watergate -
FOLLOW THE MONEY. WHO has the most to gain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DagmarK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. AMEN!!!!!!
I would predict everyone but Faux will pick this up. But eventually Faux will have to. This will take some O.T. to figure out how to continue the BJ for Bush* AND report anything having to do with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
osaMABUSh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Cut in Oct. speech ends up in '03 SOTU - Cheney's head is next!
Direct Link

http://www.msnbc.com/news/938198.asp?0cv=CA00

"The new disclosure suggests how eager the White House was in January to make Iraq’s nuclear program a part of its case against Saddam Hussein even in the face of earlier objections by its own CIA director. It also appears to raise questions about the administration’s explanation of how the faulty allegations were included in the State of the Union speech."

Do I smell a cover up?


"As Bush left Africa yesterday to return to Washington from a five-day trip overshadowed by the intelligence blunder, he was asked whether he considered the matter over. “I do,” he replied. White House press secretary Ari Fleischer told reporters yesterday that “the president has moved on. And I think, frankly, much of the country has moved on, as well.”"

Sorry, Ari America has not moved on - in fact, they are just waking up to the BFEE (by the way I thought you already resigned.)


"But it is clear from the new disclosure about Tenet’s intervention last October that the controversy continues to boil, and as new facts emerge a different picture is being presented than the administration has given to date."

"Administration sources said White House officials, particularly those in the office of Vice President Cheney, insisted on including Hussein’s quest for a nuclear weapon as a prominent part of their public case for war in Iraq."

After Tenet resigns Cheney will be next to take a hit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indictrichardperle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. "those in the office of Veep"
That is naming Scooter Libby.

Neo-con slime-bag and former attorney of Marc Rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Actually, it could very well be that "the president has moved on."
Maybe to a nice spot on the unemployment line? The office of a criminal defense lawyer? An elegant, orange jumpsuit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rppper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
24. me-thinks ari was trying to make an early break.......
....from the regime when he announced he was stepping down, but apparently this blew open before he abandon ship...run ari, run.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indypaul Donating Member (896 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #24
33. Do you think he would
be so kind as to advise the public if any of his previous
statements are "no longer operational." (With all respects
to the memory of Ron Ziegler).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nottingham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
31. Cheney is soo toast!
I wonder how the pacemaker is doing! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. Again, no one in the junta cares about the truth
For a capsule explanation, please click here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. "Tenet argued personally."
George Tenet, sayonara.

Can they still blame this on Clinton, cause they'll try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classics Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. There was a Yahoo news story earlier today.
It actually made a case for blaming it on Clinton, in a whory round-about way by suggesting Tenet was 'the last holdout of the Clinton administration'.

Now if they can just pin it on Clenis, it will be a lock LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
46. And a proper rebuttal?
I would suggest:
1) Tenet is not political he is career even though he was appointed
2) Tenet was appointed by Bush therefore Bush is responsible
3) Why doesn't Bush fire him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Exactly.
Edited on Sun Jul-13-03 04:54 PM by neuvocat
Its been well over 3 years. However the typical freeper rebuttal to your logical argument will probably be something like "Oh why can't someone just be allowed to make an honest mistake? He's only human for Godsakes. You stop picking on poor little W right this instant."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sham Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
17. ah, the sheeple are fickle, aren't they.
Edited on Sun Jul-13-03 12:38 AM by sham
The media got used to covering Clinton's penis every day for years. Then it was the election. Then 9/11. And when things finally started to settle down again, Britney Spears announced that she wasn't a virgin and Bush handed them a war to cover. Now all they left have are Laci Peterson and a resurrection (so to speak) of the Jon-Benet Ramsey story. (The are burying the story of the continuing Iraq war because it only makes them look bad.) That's why the media are going to jump on this story. And it will snowball. When the sheeple begin to eat it up, more and more lies will come out. (i.e. The story now surfacing about the * lies re: Saddam and Al Qaeda.)The only way this is going to fade away is if something BIG happens. (Terrorist attack? Sniper? Ol' Ronnie finally croaks?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
49. I doubt that the Gipper taking one for the team
would even make a dent in this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
52. Hi sham!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
18. Be sure to rate MSNBC articles
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmboxer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
19. Bush Lies Everyday!
I don't think he can talk without a couple of lies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zekeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #19
32. As resurrected the other day on these boards..
and I don't recall who it was attributed to:

You know how you can tell if he (in this case *) is lying?

If his lips are moving.

Old old
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
21. There's a photo of Big Dick Cheney
on the Wash Post web site showing him clutching his heart during a ceremony for the new Reagan aircraft carrier.

I was thinking it's because the national anthem was playing but considering this latest revelation, I'm almost certain now he was having a stroke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
22. What a wonderful "welcome home from Africa" story!
…and he thought it was over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
23. Bush lied in Sept 14 Radio Address
My gratitude to fellow DUer VaLabor for posting this gem in the new Foreign Affairs forum (in which the Israel/Palestinian conflict is kept in a sub-forum, away from the more serious and sober discussions of foreign policy).

This is such a wonderful piece of information, in which Bush himself contradicts his statement about the CIA keeping the truth from him:

Bush lied in Sept 14 Radio Address

"Today this regime likely maintains stockpiles of chemical and biological agents, and is improving and expanding facilities capable of producing chemical and biological weapons. Today Saddam Hussein has the scientists and infrastructure for a nuclear weapons program, and has illicitly sought to purchase the equipment needed to enrich uranium for a nuclear weapon. Should his regime acquire fissile material, it would be able to build a nuclear weapon within a year."

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/09/20020914.html

Posted by VaLabor here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=116&topic_id=185&mesg_id=185&page=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Equinox Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #23
36. Didn't we use
..depleted uranium in Gulf War 1 and in Iraqi Freedom and in Afghanastan? We are the rogue nation using illegal weapons. I don't see why no one calls us on it. Our soldiers our sick. The Iraqis are sick. But we got away with murder, literally.

60 billion years (if I remember correctly) is how long depleted uranium takes to decay. That's longer than the universe has been in existence!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chasqui Donating Member (237 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. Its depleted
The problem with depleted uranium is not radiation. Although there is some radiation emanating from this material, it is probably not greater than the regular background radiation that is commonly present pretty much everywhere. The issue with depleted uranium is that uranium metal is quite noxious stuff, as the body has no way to metablize it, and once ingested it stays in your body. This is simple chemical poisoning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Equinox Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Either way it's dangerous...
and illegal if memory serves me correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. Its still very radioactive
The term “depleted uranium” is very misleading since uranium 238 is not all that depleted. “Depleted” uranium is the leftovers of the uranium enrichment process when 235 - the fissionable portion has been removed. It is still very radioactive.

Its a waste product that has been piling up and they didn't have a way to dispose of it. They have discovered that its more dense than lead and its cheap. Now they are spreading it all over the other countries that they are attacking, killing civilians and the environment. It should be a war crime to use it, maybe some day it will if not too late.

http://www.sanjhb.com/writing/dangers.html
http://www.peacehost.net/PacifistNation/CaldicottAndDU.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/science/ss/stories/s580857.htm


The term "depleted uranium" falls into the same misinformation category as compassionate conservatism, detainees in Guantanamo; and CNN and Faux delivering the "news".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Equinox Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. I believe it is a war crime...
I could be wrong, but if we knowingly use depleted uranium in civilian areas (knowing the repercussions of what we are doing), then it is a war crime. Of course, it could be spun a million different ways.

Geneva Conventions state that you can't ruin the health infrastructure of another country (the Iragi water supply is contaminated)....correct me if I'm wrong, but this is a war crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryWhiteLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
53. Purchasing equipment and purchasing yellow cake are two diff. things...
Though, I think this statement by his doofusness only underscores the ramping up of war rhetoric to fit a preordained plan, it doesn't add anything to the yellow cake debacle.

Nice capture, though. Maybe we should save all the WH news releases we can from this period...lord knows, the fascists in this administration are likely to scrub a word or two.

Regards,
JB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
25. I had forgotten some of the other lies.....
and I thought at least I was paying attention.

Time to dust off those satellite photos showing that atomic facilities were being rebuilt and get them under control, I guess. <sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
union_maid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. The State of the Union lie means more
Lying to the people is SOP for this administration. Actually for most of them, I guess, but we all knew that this one was particularly balls out about it. But the State of the Union address isn't a tradition. It's a mandated report to the nation and Congress. So telling a direct, actual lie in it is just a more substantial offense than simply tell in the Lie du Jour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
28. best line in the article
Today, with U.S. troops dying in Iraq at a rate even the White House sees as politically unsustainable


:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #28
35. "POLITICALLY UNSUSTAINABLE"
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
29. Not on the front page anymore...
...and CNN & Faux are ignoring it! This is getting buried right before our eyes!

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maeve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. You've got to go to WashingtonPost.com highlights
On the bar under "News"--it's a WP exclusive right now. Let's see how it gets treated the next few days before we call it "buried."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrueBlueDem Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
39. Other news sources are picking up the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
concord Donating Member (296 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. It's today's lead story on AOL
This is not going away. I can feel it.

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrueBlueDem Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
41. It's currently the top rated story on Yahoo
(Keep in mind the ratings change constantly)

http://personal.news.yahoo.com/us/news/categories/901/index.html

#1 is the Reuters story, "CIA Stopped Iraq Nuclear Mention in Oct. Speech":

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20030713/pl_nm/bush_iraq_uranium_dc

Be sure to rate the story a "5" to keep it at the top of the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peterh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
44. This is a question I hope someone in Congress will be asking Tenet….
It is unclear why Tenet failed to intervene in January to prevent the questionable intelligence from appearing in the president’s address to Congress when Tenet had intervened three months earlier in a much less symbolic speech.


And Tenet will say something to the effect of: We warned the WH about the inclusion of that item, but when it was “re-worded”, we had no choice but to sign off on it as “factually correct” in that context. As we told the Brits, the data did not support the conclusion, but the Brits felt it did, so again, in that context, by referring to the Brit intel….rather than AMERICAN intel….the SOTU item was indeed factually correct.

And then the next question should be:
And why would you think the WH deemed the Brit intel superior to that of our own? And Tenet’s reply should be: Because the WH was cherry-picking intel to achieve a pre-desired conclusion rather than letting the data dictate the answers and our data just didn’t rise to that desired threshold.

<shit then really hits fan>

Alright, maybe a do live a dream world, but if Tenet tells the truth, I think it might play out this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDStutts Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
50. The Chimp wants to move on.
Tough luck for him nobody else wants to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
51. But Bush considers this matter closed!!
Happy to see someone in the media and the CIA willing to get the story out.. drip.. drip.. drip..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. drip drip D RIP
D(isaster of a regime) - rest in peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. D RIP
Destroyers - Rest in Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. Drip D RIP
Dissentors - Rise in Protest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kainah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
57. a prediction
MSNBC will be the network that breaks this open. They have nothing to lose, since everyone already considers them irrelevant in the cable news business, and everything to gain. They have been the only station I have been able to watch since about the middle of the "war." Buchanan & Press has been especially rewarding. Buchanan is pissed off because he was a speechwriter. He knows exactly how a SOTU is done and he has LOTS of questions. Watch for them to hit this hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
59. Well, the CIA Lie V1.0 held for all of three days . . .
Any bets on the duration of the next CondiGram or Rummy-Rum-Rumball?

Three days? Four? A week, maybe?

Definitely not Morning In America yet, but I think the eastern sky is at least a little more gray and a little less black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC