Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Rep. Coble says Iraq pullout should be considered

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 04:43 PM
Original message
U.S. Rep. Coble says Iraq pullout should be considered
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/special_packages/iraq/10604843.htm?1c

<snip>

Associated Press

GREENSBORO, N.C. - U.S. Rep. Howard Coble, a Greensboro Republican and close ally of President Bush, says the United States should consider pulling out of war-ravaged Iraq.

Coble is one of the first members of Congress to suggest a withdrawal publicly.

The 10-term congressman said in an interview with the News & Record of Greensboro that he's "fed up with picking up the newspaper and reading that we've lost another five or 10 of our young men and women in Iraq."


<snip>

Coble, who has represented the 6th District since 1984, says he voted to give Bush sweeping war-making powers assuming the administration had a post-invasion strategy.

"If there was, I wish someone would tell me what it is or show it to me," he said. "I'd like to see it."


"...one of the first members of Congress to suggest a withdrawal publicly."

But not the first.

Dennis Kucinich has had a plan to bring the troops home since the war began.

http://www.kucinich.us/bringourtroopshome.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good for Rep. Coble
I wonder how he'll be "punished" by the Thug Squatters in the White House.

This is how it begins, though; this is how Vietnam was brought to an end. A small start.

Bless his heart. Thanks for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. If they are feeling brave enough to speak against him, do you think
the HeadReThug can punish? He's lame duck term limits, and he'll be gone. They'll still be up for re-election. And with only a 48% approval rating, they may be opening their eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. When..........
......have those thugs ever restrained themselves from doing whatever they please?

And, as a lame duck, why would he give a rat's ass as to consequences?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. I'm sorry, I meant Bush is a lame duck. The Repubs will be looking at
2008. At this point, the Repubs may think Bush will not be bringing much to the political table, so speaking out against his policies will help the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prodemsouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Yeah and Newt has a book blasting Bush on his handling of the Iraq war.
Repugs who plan to be around after 08 are separating themselves from Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. I'll believe it when I see it
These murderers are relentless. They don't just want to win; they want to obliterate people like us.

They're power-mad, see. And they're abusive and angry. They have no limits, no self-discipline, no restraint, and no sense of accountability.

That's what scares me about all of this. How much further do you think they can go? I see the next four years as the most dangerous in our nation's history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craiga86 Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Coble is pretty close with my grandfather....
He's my first cousin twice removed, whatever that means. The thing about him is that he's a traditional conservative. He spoke out against the war at the beggining stages of the war, and because of that I show alittle more respect towards him than other rethugs. He should have known better to give Buch and Co full control over Iraq. We need to be fighting the REAL threat (Al Qaeda), not a self-inflicted quagmire in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Well, I say, again,
Good for Rep. Coble.

All true conservatives must be appalled by this so-called "administration" and what they've done to our country.

Yes, a lot of people should have known better, but, then, I've always thought the War Powers Act is an illegal usurpation of the power specifically delineated in the Constitution. Plus, Fuckface lied to everyone, and even John Kerry voted "yes" when everyone believed the lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Yes, and how many
Democrats also voted for the IWR? That wasn't just a republican error.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. They were all playing politics with that vote
and willingly abdicated their power to avoid "responsibility" chickensh*ts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
35. I'll come around to that opinion myself, I'm sure - your "bless his heart"
part. Which is a worthy viewpoint.

But I've gotta admit - my initial reaction to this is "no fuckin' shit, pal. Where the HELL have you been - Fantasyland?"

But you couldn't be more correct - this IS how it starts. This too is a drip-drip-drip, just like it was in Vietnam, which I'm old enough to remember. This is the trim-tab that starts turning the rudder that eventually turns the entire ship.

And I must compliment you - AND others on this thread - for a more patient and reasoned reaction to this, and your nonjudgmental welcoming of it. I'm still just so friggin' angry at republi-CONS in general (even those who start sounding like they're waking up - my first reaction is one of suspicion), and ANY apologists and excuse-makers for this war, in OUR party too, that it's hard for me to accept this at face value without wanting to throw lots of sneers and catcalls back at them.

We DO need more guys like this (and women, too) beginning to wake up to the truth. And it DOES have to be among the republi-CONS and die-hard bush-worshippers. That's the only thing that brought Nixon down - when his own party turned against him. A trillion-bajillion Democrats under EVERY doorstep and around EVERY corner and flowing out of EVERY faucet of EVERY bathroom inside the Beltway won't make a scrap of difference if the republi-CONS all remain in lockstep. But looks like the palace walls may be showing a few cracks in them...

Let's hope so anyway. If we're lucky, this will at least be the beginning of the end of the war, if not the bush nightmare (perhaps that's just a wee bit too much to hope for).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. You warm the cockles
of this OldLeftieLawyer's heart.

And you're right about his own having to turn against him. That's why breaking it down into parties doesn't do a thing for our cause. We need people to come out and say what is right and just and true, and it's good if they're Republicans, so keep smiling. It scares them.

You're coming around, child, and learning that getting angry doesn't do much but cloud your judgment. Stay calm, stay cool, and take the fucking palace under cover of darkness when the mofos think they're safe.

Keep smiling, kid. You're on to something.

:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bok_Tukalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. I've always thought America would retreat before a draft
I think we are going to see more of this after the Iraqi "elections."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I hope your right but I wouldn't hold my breath!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bok_Tukalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Let me know which Senators and Congressmen
will fall on their 2006 swords to enstate a draft?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. Yup. After the 'elections' and all the contracts are in place ...
... they can blame it on the Iraqis and keep their spoils.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
3days Donating Member (463 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Aww what the hell
We flattened the country
We captured their leader
We found no WMD
We created more terrorists who hate America
We killed countless innocent people
We caused the death of over 1300 American sevicemen and or women
We caused the injury of many more

Looks like our job is done here.
Packerass brotherman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well I'll be damned
The crusty old fart finally said something I agree with.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jfxgillis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Phuque the sunovabeetch
There's not ONE WORD he said that he couldn't have said, and I GUARANTEE he was thinking it, last October when it counted.

Fuck him and fuck all the isolationist righty Republicans of his ilk.

He's sick of reading about five or ten Americans at time getting killed?

He should take it with a smile. He wanted it, he voted for it, he got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prodemsouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ok make that one of the first in Congress who people take note of
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. NOW he's fed up with reading the reports of US servicemembers killed?
NOW?????

NEVER. SHOULDA. BEEN THERE.

But yeah, stop the killing and insanity. Please.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. Another shot in the civil war within the GOP
rings out. We will soon find ourselves aligned with moderate Republicans. This has the potential of allowing coalitions to be formed to stop Bush's most evil initiatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. I hope so.
I want to bring the this war to an end for many reasons.

First, to enact a more profound "stop-loss;" I want to stop the loss of any more lives.

Second, to stop the financial dissolution of my country, by plugging the gaping wound all the funds are flowing to. Not that ending the war will change the rest of the economic policy, but its a damned good start.

Third, it's the first step in refocusing and redefining our international role. Again, not that I expect the current force in power to suddenly become masters of diplomacy. But we have to start somewhere.

If something good happens by forming coalitions, we might see a reduction in polarization, and thus in the demonization of everything not on the corporate agenda list. One could hope.

I say this as someone who is as liberal/progressive as we come; on the vast majority of the issues, I'm not moderate. I'm not even on the chart with moderates, democrat or republican. But I won't let that stop me from working with moderates for positive change.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prodemsouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. When will people learn moderate Republicans are still................
Edited on Sun Jan-09-05 06:00 PM by Prodemsouth
Republicans. Don't count on any real opposition from them until Bush is flying back to Crawford second term completed. I can already see these threads on DU:

Jan 21st, 2008 Senator (elected in 2006) Christy Todd Whitman says Bush really sucked..isn't that gal great. Moderate Repug Women are great. Never mind that she helped Jeb get elected.

Jan 30th 2008. After heavy campaigning for his brother Jeb, Governor Arnold Says former President George W. Bush moved to far to the right and made decisions which were not in the country's best interest. Way to go Arnold, sock it to that girly man Bush..

Feb 1st, 2011 As the disastrous economic policy becomes ever more apparent. Lincoln Chafee says he might help Dems out a little more this time, he may even not vote for the Republican President this time around - he still will not support the Democratic candidate as Zell Miller again did for the Republicans with his support of Jeb Bush. Chafee is said to be considering voting for President Jeb Bush's brother the former President.. moderate Republicans are great. I always like Lincoln and considered him to be someone with guts.. A real patriot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Florida_Geek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. I think you are going to see more and more of this over
the next year.

Bush can not run again, but these House members have to run every two years.

IMHO, Bush down fall is his SSA changes. NOBODY likes them. And the AARP today in the St. Pete Times had their full page Gambling Ad. As people turn off to Bushes SSA changes, the House members will be looking at groups like the Gray Hair set that voted for him last time, maybe not voting for him in 2006.

It sounds like a lot of anti-war people in this person district and the more bodies come home the more votes he is losing.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StephanieMarie Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
19. It's a start
but they need to check their facts -- it's over 1330 dead now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
20. May every single death haunt him day and night
Edited on Sun Jan-09-05 05:11 PM by Rose Siding
Coble, who has represented the 6th District since 1984, says he voted to give Bush sweeping war-making powers assuming the administration had a post-invasion strategy.

Naked military aggression would have been JUST FINE if only there was a better after plan?

No one who was wise enough to have preferred peace all along is given the respect of the those with catastophically "successful" judgement of falling for the idiot bush. It's disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
22. Maybe this is part of a plan by the administration...
Pick out the one republican who was slightly against the war, and have them talk about bringing the troops home just before the Iragi election. Once the elections are over, start to bring the troops home and claim a victory. Get the media to go along with "Iraqi's are free and living in a democratic society", and America might go along with it.

I don't believe that this is the case, but I wouldn't put it past Rove to do anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. we bombed the hell of their country and killed thousands and now
Edited on Sun Jan-09-05 05:26 PM by rodeodance
we just goona pull out??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
25. he could be carrying the water for a cut and run. that would free
up the military for invading other countries. I don't trust this. not from a pug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbizuX Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
28. thanks. Rep. Coble
like a pebble in a lake, it always takes one influential person to make a statement, and then suddenly it starts to spread.

Remember when it used to Baathist deadenders, and you couldn't utter the words insurgency, quagmire, or Iraq...now they are commonplace.

let's make "get out of Iraq" commonplace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
29. Isn't this like Vietnam in "fast-forward"?
One HUGE problem. The neoCONimperialists "learned" from the Nixon era and have done everything criminally possible to do a "stop-loss" in shielding themselves from both discovery and accountability.

They are slithering snakes escaping their constitutional mandates as servants to this great republic. They have only one master: power unto themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
30. Whoa
This is something coming from a republican.

He either really has some balls, or this is the first act in the Bush administration withdrawing and trying to save face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
31. And then we impeach the SOB
* I mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vox_Reason Donating Member (589 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
33. Wow!! Real repugnican dissent?
WHAT?!? A repug stalwart from my Tarheel state that I can be proud of?!?!??

In 2003, Coble received an 80 percent rating from the American Conservative Union and his voting record scored a 5 rating from the liberal Americans for Democratic Action. (http://asp.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/CandidateProfile.aspx?ci=453&oi=H)

I think the room is starting to spin...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
34. If Rep. Coble thinks he's fed up
he ought to put on a helmet and pick up a weapon and take his old ass over to Iraq and join the troops that have been involuntarily extended. His great awakening that Bushco have no idea what they are doing is a little late. How a lot of lives, US and Iraqi, have been lost while people like him sat around hoping W really wasn't a stupid as he appears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
despairing optimist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
36. And so it begins. The beginning of the end
Someone mentioned that the situation is like Vietnam in fast-forward. It's also like Watergate in fast-forward, only Nixon actually trounced McGovern in '72 and did get a mandate, which quickly unraveled into a rout less than two years later. There are investigations already under way, and somewhere there's a tentative list of articles of impeachment waiting for the right moment.

This administration is going down. The paleocons don't want fanatics upsetting the apple cart and laying waste to US assets carefully culled from the world's masses over many years. They will find common cause with elites of all political persuasions with just as much wealth at stake. As Deep Throat said to Woodward and Bernstein, follow the money. It will lead the Bushes out of power soon enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
37. The war was success for Bush** (Rove). He was "re-elected". Idiots
voted for Bush** to "support the troops" and to support our "commander in chief". They can pull out now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
39. It might just be Karl Rove's way of getting Bush out of Iraq. Now
he wants to destroy America and its people (social security et al). The Stump is probably bored now with killing innocent Iraqis--he has their oil all lined up for the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
40. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. The U.S. will stay in Iraq for at least four more...
years.

US rejects Sunni election offer


US embassy officials held unprecedented talks with influential Iraqi Sunni Muslim clerics at the weekend, but turned down an offer under which Sunni political parties would end their boycott of January 30 elections.

"Senior embassy officials met with them," a US official said today.
"They obviously discussed Sunni participation in the political process." The members of the Committee of Muslim Scholars, which groups 3000 Sunni mosques across Iraq, said they would lift their boycott on voting if the US Government provided, under international auspices, a timeframe for US withdrawal from Iraq, the official said.

"We're not going to do that," the official said.
The influential religious body, founded in the days after the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime, called for a general boycott of the electoral process after US troops attacked the former rebel stronghold of Fallujah on November 8.

The group has been accused of links to Iraq's insurgency across central Iraq, which is waged mainly by Sunni Muslims, angry at the post-Saddam state of the country.

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #41
46. You are an optimist. I expect an indefinite US presence in Iraq.
The military-industrial complex will get several billion in pork each month, and the good old boys in the oil industry will get a lock on a supply of crude, provided they work hand-in-hand with local kleptocrats. It's too good for our greedy friends in the Ownership Society not to grab.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
42. I think this guy has guts, and I applaud him!
North Carolina Republican -- and a friend of *.

Let's see some more of them -- both Dems and Repugs -- step up to the plate. Show some backbone.

This is great news.

Why is everyone so cynical?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Here is why I am cynical about the
Bush Junta and Iraq.



The Hand-Over That Wasn't: Illegal Orders give the US a Lock on Iraq's Economy
by Antonia Juhasz

Officially, the U.S. occupation of Iraq ended on June 28, 2004. But in reality, the United States is still in charge: Not only do 138,000 troops remain to control the streets, but the "100 Orders" of L. Paul Bremer III remain to control the economy.

These little noticed orders enacted by Bremer, the now-departed head of the now-defunct Coalition Provisional Authority, go to the heart of Bush administration plans in Iraq. They lock in sweeping advantages to American firms, ensuring long-term U.S. economic advantage while guaranteeing few, if any, benefits to the Iraqi people.

The Bremer orders control every aspect of Iraqi life - from the use of car horns to the privatization of state-owned enterprises. Order No. 39 alone does no less than "transition from a … centrally planned economy to a market economy" virtually overnight and by U.S. fiat.

Although many thought that the "end" of the occupation would also mean the end of the orders, on his last day in Iraq Bremer simply transferred authority for the orders to Prime Minister Iyad Allawi - a 30-year exile with close ties to the CIA and British intelligence.

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0805-07.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. well, HA! I'm cynical about the * admin, too,
and know they leave disasters everywhere, and Iraq will be one of the biggest.

But I don't know why people take it as such bad news that this Republican rep is calling for a pull-out. This cannot be good news to the White House crew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC