Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Failing Pension Plans Push Union to Review Retirement Age for Pilots

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 09:56 PM
Original message
Failing Pension Plans Push Union to Review Retirement Age for Pilots
The airline industry's financial crisis and the collapse of some pension plans are leading the nation's biggest pilot union and some aviation experts to question a federal rule requiring that airline pilots retire at the age of 60.

Letting pilots work a few years longer would give those who are suddenly facing much more frugal retirements more time to save money, and could reduce the funds' expenses by cutting the number of pensioners, advocates say. For some airlines, it could also trim operating costs by reducing the need to train new pilots, although not all airlines would see benefits and some might see additional costs, experts say.

Some pilots see the idea of another few years of work as intensely appealing, and are arguing that it would be good for the industry, too. Graham W. Jones 3rd, a 59-year-old captain who flies Boeing 747's for United Airlines, said the influx of retiring pilots would strain the finances of the government's Pension Guarantee Benefit Corporation, which is poised to take over United's pension plan. The corporation has already taken over US Airways' pension plan.

When his company's plan was healthy, Mr. Jones was expecting a pension of nearly $9,000 a month and a lump-sum payment of $250,000; now he is expecting no lump sum and a monthly benefit of about $2,500, he said. "Now that the pensions have fallen apart, I'll have to do something else, maybe be a greeter at Wal-Mart," he said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/07/politics/07pilot.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why are we simply accepting that the pensions are "falling apart"???
Why is this acceptable on any level?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amazona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. jeebus pleebus
Edited on Sun Feb-06-05 10:20 PM by amazona
I'm sorry but I know what turning a young and sprightly 40 has done to my response time and reflexes.

No one should be piloting a commercial jet past age 60. This is ridiculous. Fund a decent retirement for these people already. And if they still want to fly -- and I understand that people love flying -- let it be in small craft where only they are at risk.

We have an 80 year old flight attendant, the infamous "Bob" on Northwest Airlines.

What is next? An 80 year old pilot?

No, people, sorry. Middle age is the ideal age where you still have some of the reflexes of youth but the experience of age. But older people should not be piloting large commercial craft. This is just not fair to the passengers.

Take my nail clipper for my "security" and then hand me over to a 68 year old pilot? Don't think so!

P.S. As for the dude who can't live on $2,500 a month pension -- more than I have ever dreamed of earning at any point in my entire life -- no sympathy there. If you can't live on that in retirement with a paid-off house and Medicare, there is something seriously wrong with your values. Your pension is not supposed to pay for you to party with Paris Hilton. $9K a month pension indeed. Sheesh.


The conservation movement is a breeding ground of communists
and other subversives. We intend to clean them out,
even if it means rounding up every birdwatcher in the country.
--John Mitchell, US Attorney General 1969-72


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedeminredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. If pensions are falling apart
and performing so badly, giving the retirees only a fraction of their expected retirement income, how is it the Bush people and their henchmen expect their model for private Social Security accounts to make us all RICH? How does that work? Is there a magic place where they'll be "growing" the money for the new wealthy "ownership" society?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. ownership society...
Edited on Sun Feb-06-05 11:59 PM by flyarm
now you know..what ever * names it ..it is just the opposite!!
that means you are owned as slave labor to the elite!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC