The airline industry's financial crisis and the collapse of some pension plans are leading the nation's biggest pilot union and some aviation experts to question a federal rule requiring that airline pilots retire at the age of 60.
Letting pilots work a few years longer would give those who are suddenly facing much more frugal retirements more time to save money, and could reduce the funds' expenses by cutting the number of pensioners, advocates say. For some airlines, it could also trim operating costs by reducing the need to train new pilots, although not all airlines would see benefits and some might see additional costs, experts say.
Some pilots see the idea of another few years of work as intensely appealing, and are arguing that it would be good for the industry, too. Graham W. Jones 3rd, a 59-year-old captain who flies Boeing 747's for United Airlines, said the influx of retiring pilots would strain the finances of the government's Pension Guarantee Benefit Corporation, which is poised to take over United's pension plan. The corporation has already taken over US Airways' pension plan.
When his company's plan was healthy, Mr. Jones was expecting a pension of nearly $9,000 a month and a lump-sum payment of $250,000; now he is expecting no lump sum and a monthly benefit of about $2,500, he said. "Now that the pensions have fallen apart, I'll have to do something else, maybe be a greeter at Wal-Mart," he said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/07/politics/07pilot.html