Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UK link to torture jail's rules

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 08:48 PM
Original message
UK link to torture jail's rules
Edited on Sat Feb-19-05 09:00 PM by paineinthearse
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1418624,00.html

UK link to torture jail's rules

Army lawyer saw document on interrogation techniques

Jamie Doward
Sunday February 20, 2005
The Observer

A British official was involved in drafting rules permitting extreme interrogation techniques at Abu Ghraib jail in Baghdad, centre of the controversy over the use of torture by US forces against Iraqi prisoners. Last night it emerged that the government has been forced to retract claims that no British military officer had seen or been involved with the crucial document allowing guards to subject detainees to interrogation methods including the use of dogs, sleep deprivation and stress positions, in breach of the Geneva Convention.

Last year the jail achieved notoriety when photographs emerged of guards forcing prisoners to strip naked and simulate sex acts. Other photographs showed detainees being set upon with dogs and beaten. The Armed Forces Minister, Adam Ingram, has admitted in a letter to a Plaid Cymru MP, Adam Price, that a senior British Army lawyer assigned to the coalition's legal department in Baghdad contributed to 'comments provided by his superior' when drafting the document.

It is not known if the officer supported or opposed the document, but the revelation raises serious questions about who in the Army's chain of command knew of the interrogation techniques being employed at Abu Ghraib and when. The British officer made a weekly report to his superiors and was also under a responsibility to alert them if he felt international law governing the treatment of detainees was being flouted.

'For the government to now admit that their earlier statement was incorrect and that a senior British lawyer had some role in the drafting process is very worrying,' Price said. 'The use of techniques such as sensory deprivation are illegal under British military law. It's against the Geneva Convention, too. The alarm bells should have been ringing. I would have expected the British chain of command to have been alerted to the Americans' practices.' The document, entitled Interrogation and Counter-Resistance Policy, was drawn up by the coalition's Combined Joint Task Force 7 (CJTF), which was in charge of supervising the interrogation of Iraqi detainees, and borrowed heavily from techniques employed at Guantanamo Bay. Signed off on 14 September 2003, the document underwent several drafts before being approved.

more.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC