Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ex-CIA chief condemns terror flights

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 05:47 AM
Original message
Ex-CIA chief condemns terror flights
Feb 27, 2005

A FORMER senior CIA officer has condemned the practice of shuttling detainees from the war on terror to interrogation and torture facilities in the Middle East on flights, some of which pass through Scottish airports.

Robert Baer, one of the CIA’s top operatives in the Middle East over the past 25 years, says that if the flights, known as the Guantanamo Express, prove to be carrying detainees, “Britain has the right to intervene … and refuse those flights”.

The Gulfstream V and Boeing 737, owned by a CIA front company, have landed at both Prestwick and Glasgow airports on several occasions shuttling to Dulles airport, Washington. The Gulfstream V, former registration N379P later changing to N8068V, has landed on at least 20 occasions since early 2002.

Both aircraft are understood to have been carrying out what the US intelligence service calls “rendition flights.”

This is a controversial practice condemned by human rights activists, where prisoners are often snatched in one country and transported to another where they may be tortured contrary to international law, in an attempt to gain information useful in the war against terrorism.

http://www.sundayherald.com/48053
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. But, but........
WE LIKE TORTURE!

James Spader says so, and he won the case on Boston legal....

Alan Shore: The truth is as Americans we love torture. We keep it to ourselves of course. But come on, when it comes to evildoers, torture's okay. Hollywood certainly knows that. Dirty Harry. Boom. Charles Bronson in Death Wish. Denzel Washington in "Man on Fire." Heroes torturing the bad guys. In theaters all across the country. We cheered. We like torture. Is there potential for abuse? Of course. the events at Abu Ghraib prison were deplorable. But do we really think they happened in a vacuum. Alberto Gonzalez, our Atty General, wrote a memo to the administration saying torture's okay. Our Supreme Court just recently held that evidence gained by torture can be used in trials. Alan Dershowitz, one of the leading civil rights activists in our country, raised the issue of using torture warrants so as to at least to be more open about it. Torture warrants. Love that torture. Shhhh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Humans can be
a very sick and sadistic species. Add that to the fact that we are living in irrational times and you end up with a very dangerous combination.

If you look at the programming on TV and in movies most of it is geared toward desensitizing people to death and destruction. The good guys always win and recover from whatever injuries they've suffered by the end of the film.

I'd much rather my kid watch a show with lesbian parents, than half the other crap that is shown every day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Briar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. “Britain has the right to intervene … and refuse those flights”
Oh please, as if Bliar (currently planning to add house detention to his government's list of shameful acts: soon we'll be just like Burma) would do anything of the kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. kick to combine threads
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kris10ep Donating Member (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Top former CIA agent condemns new terror war


Robert Baer explains to Foreign Editor David Pratt why the ‘clumsy, knee-jerk approach’ to al-Qaeda is counter-productive


A running joke in Washington late last year held that Langley, the CIA’s home in Virginia, was changing its name to Fallujah after the restive Iraqi town then held by insurgents. Like Fallujah, Langley – according to some White House wags – was full of rebels that needed to be cleared out. This would inevitably lead to lots of casualties along the way.

But putting the jokes and bravado aside, many at the CIA’s longtime base already knew that the winds of change were blowing their way, and were well aware of the reason why. George W Bush, his eyes by then firmly fixed on a second term, was consolidating his position. It was time to rein in those agencies and their operatives that were not always singing from the same political hymn sheet as the President and those closest to him.

In the months that followed, a new CIA chief, Porter Goss, would be appointed – as would a new director of national intelligence: John Negroponte. And there would be other changes too, in tactics and operations.

All of this has since set alarm bells ringing among human rights activists and security analysts who claim “hardmen” are back at the CIA helm with a whole suitcase full of revamped dirty tricks ranging from political assassinations and death squads to the shuttling of detainees to interrogation and torture facilities worldwide. Few people know more about how the CIA operates on the ground than former agent Robert Baer, one of the agency’s top field operatives of the past quarter-century.

http://www.sundayherald.com/48036
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Top Former CIA Agent Condemns New Terror War
I did hear of this on any news today at all.



http://www.sundayherald.com/48036

> Published on Sunday, February 27, 2005 by The Sunday Herald (Scotland)

> Top Former CIA Agent Condemns New Terror War

> Robert Baer explains to Foreign Editor David Pratt why the ‘clumsy, knee-jerk approach’ to al-Qaeda is counter-productive
> by David Pratt
>
>
> A running joke in Washington late last year held that Langley, the CIA's home in Virginia, was changing its name to Fallujah after the restive Iraqi town then held by insurgents. Like Fallujah, Langley - according to some White House wags - was full of rebels that needed to be cleared out. This would inevitably lead to lots of casualties along the way.
>
> But putting the jokes and bravado aside, many at the CIA's longtime base already knew that the winds of change were blowing their way, and were well aware of the reason why. George W Bush, his eyes by then firmly fixed on a second term, was consolidating his position. It was time to rein in those agencies and their operatives that were not always singing from the same political hymn sheet as the President and those closest to him.
>
> In the months that followed, a new CIA chief, Porter Goss, would be appointed - as would a new director of national intelligence: John Negroponte. And there would be other changes too, in tactics and operations.
>
> All of this has since set alarm bells ringing among human rights activists and security analysts who claim "hardmen" are back at the CIA helm with a whole suitcase full of revamped dirty tricks ranging from political assassinations and death squads to the shuttling of detainees to interrogation and torture facilities worldwide. Few people know more about how the CIA operates on the ground than former agent Robert Baer, one of the agency's top field operatives of the past quarter-century.......

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. So we are back to the CIA of the 60s?
I take it "hardmen" is code for people with no moral compass?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Related NYT thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC