Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

High Oil Prices Haven’t Impacted World Growth’-- Saudi news site

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:42 PM
Original message
High Oil Prices Haven’t Impacted World Growth’-- Saudi news site
A fairly upbeat report on the dollar-- glad that at least some of the world's bankers view U.S. currency with confidence. It's also good that high oil prices won't harm American economic growth-- that's not what I've heard, but glad to hear someone thinks so.

Re the upbeat analysis: In the back of my mind, I am remembering how Jeff Skilling and Ken Lay praised Enron stock as the rumors started to fly, and told their own employees that they should not sell and should even buy more as the price was coming down. Meanwhile, people in the know about the company's actual finances were selling out like crazy.



High Oil Prices Haven’t Impacted World Growth’
Khalil Hanware, Arab News

Hamad Al-Sayari

JEDDAH, 8 March 2005 —
Top central bankers meeting in Basel, Switzerland, were generally optimistic about the world economy recording robust growth this year, Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency (SAMA) Governor Hamad Al-Sayari said yesterday. Al-Sayari said that rising oil prices had so far not impacted growth. He also said that faster US growth compared with other developed economies is positive for the dollar and further efforts to cut the US twin deficits would benefit the currency.

<snip>

“The US is the engine of growth in the industrialized world and it is way ahead of other countries in terms of economic and productivity growth. This is positive for the dollar. If there is any policy change in (reducing) the current account and budget deficits it would be positive for the dollar,” he added. The US administration has pledged to halve the US budget deficit in five years. The world’s biggest economy grew at an annual rate of 3.8 percent in the fourth quarter, outpacing the euro zone and Japan.

Al-Sayari said central bank governors meeting at the Bank for International Settlements would discuss the world economy, with an eye on inflation risks from high oil prices.

<snip>


Central bankers are also expected to discuss the problem of global structural imbalances. The US current account deficit, currently around 5 percent of gross domestic product, has created imbalances whereby the United States sucks in imports from major economies with stagnant growth.

China has come under international pressure to revalue the yuan, pegged to the dollar since the Asian crisis in the late 1990s, to help correct the imbalances. US pressure on China to scrap its fixed currency regime reflects complaints by US exporters that it makes Chinese goods artificially cheap, swelling the US trade deficit. But asked if a yuan revaluation could solve the imbalances problem, Al-Sayari said: “No. I think China is an important region for world economic growth and it should not take hasty measures which would disrupt world growth.” China has repeatedly said it will keep the yuan stable but has pledged to promote financial sector reforms.

Al-Sayari reiterated that the dollar still had an edge over its peers as a reserve currency. Concerns that the world’s central banks, especially in Asia and the Middle East, might diversify their foreign exchange reserves have weighed on the dollar in the past few years.
“In reserve management, central banks pursue objectives such as preservation of value, liquidity and good return. The dollar still is a dominant reserve currency,” he said.


<snip>

http://www.arabnews.com/?page=6§ion=0&article=60118&d=8&m=3&y=2005

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. What they mean is no Supply Side Stagflation. Because Americans
are underemployed so wages are falling as oil prices rise - it cancels its inflation out. That is important because the wealthy loose money when there is inflation.

Aren't you happy?

Another gift from the working classes to the elites. You'd think they would be begging to pay a progressive amount of taxes. But no - that would be fair.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue to the bone Donating Member (765 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Adjusted for inflation, the price of a barrel of oil today is not much...
Edited on Tue Mar-08-05 11:20 PM by Blue to the bone
....higher than it was during the late 1970's. That may be part of the reason it has not yet had a serious negative impact on world economic growth.

1981 price in today's dollars = $66.20

http://inflationdata.com/inflation/inflation_rate/Historical_Oil_Prices_Table.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue to the bone Donating Member (765 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Here's another chart that shows it was $94.28 in 1980 dollars adjusted...
....to 2004 dollars.

What's the right answer? Dunno.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I bet you a Million dollars that when the economy hits full employment
the feds will up interest rates at the slightest sign of price increases. That is what they did from mid 1980s on. The rich hate inflation (bad for workers too since they have to pay for the shocks that made Oil & Military rich). When the economy is not bubbling at full go - there is room for Oil prices to go higher.

But I agree that I have no idea about oil prices in real dollars then or now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. We were all at full employment in 1970s. We didn't face competition
from much of Asia or China or Eastern Europe. Because we were at full employment the economy had less room to adjust and move things around. So those gas prices hit and it knocked the economy out of the stadium.

IMHO. Supply-side shocks depend on aggregate economy which is less bouncy & flexible to sudden changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC