Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Army seeks longer enlistments as recruitment falters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 02:07 PM
Original message
US Army seeks longer enlistments as recruitment falters
http://news.inq7.net/world/index.php?index=1&story_id=30824

The US Army has asked Congress to allow it to extend enlistment contracts offered to future soldiers by two years in order to "stabilize the force," as top defense officials warned that key recruitment targets for the year could be missed.

The request came as the House of Representatives on Wednesday put its stamp of approval on an 81.4-billion-dollar supplemental spending bill that contains new benefits for US troops deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan.

But the new money notwithstanding, Army Deputy Chief of Staff Lieutenant General Franklin Hagenbeck told a House subcommittee that yearly recruitment goals for the Army reserve and the National Guard were "at risk."

"In the manning area, we need Congress to change the maximum enlistment time from six years to eight years in order to help stabilize the force for longer periods of time," Hagenbeck went on to say.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Seems pointless
The initial enlistment contract is already 8 years, with your selected number of years as 'active' and the remainder 'inactive'. But we've already seen them recalling or keeping people through the inactive period.

And anyone in over 10 years already has to re-enlist 'until retirement', so a longer contract wouldnt affect them either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarianJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. HMMMMM,...
...it's a little chilly in here. Does anyone feel a draft?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. This is the draftiest I've felt since 1965.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Watch out BikeWriter.........
Looks like you and my hubby graduated about the same time from Vietnam. You know they are starting to call back ya'll old guys.

Left of cool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. They wouldn't want me after my heart attack and depression...
...although I do wish I could help those poor troops. ;(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LdyGuique Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah -- that policy is gonna REALLY increase new enlistments
Not only are we gonna send these people to a war front with repeated deployments, but we're gonna make them stay in longer and deploy even more.

Shouldn't logic be a mandatory course for defense planners?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Read the small writing where it says your enlistment can be rolled
over 40 times in a row.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC