Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lab fireball 'may be black hole'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 11:27 PM
Original message
Lab fireball 'may be black hole'
Lab fireball 'may be black hole'

BBC, 17 March, 2005

A fireball created in a US particle accelerator has the characteristics of a black hole, a physicist has said.

It was generated at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) in New York, US, which smashes beams of gold nuclei together at near light speeds.

...

The Brown researcher thinks the particles are disappearing into the fireball's core and reappearing as thermal radiation, just as matter is thought to fall into a black hole and come out as "Hawking" radiation.

However, even if the ball of plasma is a black hole, it is not thought to pose a threat. At these energies and distances, gravity is not the dominant force in a black hole.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4357613.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. NOT.THOUGHT.TO.POSE.A.THREAT. ???
damn, that's reassuring.


dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. small black holes evaporate
very quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
36. That was my first reaction as well.
I'm reminded of some old sci-fi regarding similar occurrances... all was not well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. At least it doesn't last very long.
Whatever it is, it lasts for only a fraction of a second, according to another article I read on it. Whew!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Fraction? LOL!
Ten million billion billionths of a second.

Whew. Now that's a New York minute!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
43. Isn't that 10 million seconds?
(10 million * 1 billion) * 0.000000001 sec. = 10,000,000 seconds

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. That Is Some Scary Shit.
If we don't destroy ourselves, is faster than light speed travel a possibility?

Jay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Not really...
But we might be able to take a shortcut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. It's interesting, even Einstein's calculations don't say
Edited on Fri Mar-18-05 12:30 AM by kgfnally
that space itself can't in theory travel faster than light. That was my understanding, anyway...

And doesn't gravity have no speed as well? Isn't the effect of gravity, it's 'speed', if you will, in effect instantaneous?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. My (admittedly limited) understanding is that
the speed of gravity is the speed of light.

http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn3232
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #15
32. So someone jumping out of an airplane will reach the speed of light??????
There is a maximum velocity that can be obtained though I can't recall what that figure is. It is quite small though something like 120 mph or so... certainly not the speed of light though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. For one earth mass plus air resistance, yes
It's called "terminal velocity".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #32
38. Was that a joke?
The space-time distortion of gravity propagates at the speed of light. So, for example, if the sun were somehow to instantaneously disappear, Earth would continue in its orbit for about 8 minutes: it would "notice" the loss of gravity the same moment it "noticed" the loss of light. The terminal velocity of a body falling in atmosphere is about atmospheric drag, nothing to do with the propagation of gravity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #32
48. I don't think Dookus was quite right...
...but I don't think we're talking about gravity's acceleration, but how quickly gravity takes hold on something...the time it takes to begin accelerating.

I don't know, but seems to me it would be instantaneous or immeasurably small.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
55. don't think so
isn't gravity defined as a mass dropping in a vacuum at a speed of 32 ft per second/sec? Didn't Einstein say the speed of light is a constant that nothing can attain, but can come close in theory?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #55
69. No, gravity is the attraction of mass to mass
per sec per sec is an acceleration (change in velocity) measurement not a speed (velocity) measurement which would be only one per sec.

Long time ago I was taught the effect of gravity is instantaneous. I'm not sure what the current thoughts are.

The effect of gravity (acceleration force) is proportional to the masses of the objects involved and inversly proportional to distance squared. If I wasn't so lazy I'd go dig up the Newtonian formulas. Newton devised calculus to handle the math involved measuring the gravitational effects of bodies.

-Hoot

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #55
71. The impression I got was that space ITSELF can do so, but
I don't have the slightest idea how one might prove that.

When I mentioned gravity, I was thinking along the lines of, "suppose I spawned a massive body in space. Another body is x distance away. How much time passes until body B is affected by the gravity of body A?"

I don't think that question has been answered yet by science, since we can't "spawn" a massive body and measure the effect its gravity has on surrounding space. I don't think it's been determined exactly where mass comes from in the first place!

I could be wrong about all this, so someone please clue me in if I am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mn9driver Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #71
72. Gravity Waves: Observations match the theory
They propagate at or near the speed of light. Here's a link that talks about it in language I can understand:

http://archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Cyberia/NumRel/GravWaves.html

Cool stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
44. I think inflationary models say expansion can be >c
But no useful message could come out of it, so the relativistic basis of causality is not affected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. If it's safe..
Someone should stick their head in and see what's on the other "side".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Can we get Bush to volunteer? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
19. As long as he takes the 2004 Election Results with him!
And the Inauguration. And...and...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
49. I don't know -- what happens when one black hole meets another?
Bush's intellect + lab-manufactured singularity .... I'm going to look for a hiding place now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
24. ROFLMAO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
33. yeah, that they should do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. So that's what happened to the Bill of RIghts
it was the victim of a lab experiment in black holes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeeBGBz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. Black holes suck
Great. We're probably all gonna die now.

Or maybe an unexpected visit to the Alpha quadrant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. I want controlled wormholes.
Like on Stargate SG1 and Stargate Atlantis. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokercat999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
13. Black hole? I thought
that is a place where this administration was pouring our middle class tax dollars. Or was that a rat hole or a S*it hole or a rabbit hole as in Alice in Bushland?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
14. Must. Nominate. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_DeLeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
16. So how long till we can weaponize this?
Cause you know its going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. Of course.
Edited on Fri Mar-18-05 08:25 AM by Jamastiene
They probably got most of their funding to research this just for that purpose to begin with...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #16
29. Weaponize is in the realm of possibility the "Quantum Bomb".
Edited on Fri Mar-18-05 09:44 AM by gordianot
See this discussion: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread26286/pg1

and here: http://www.pureenergysystems.com/news/2004/08/30/6900039_DarkMatters/

excerpt:

Recently the British science news journal "New Scientist" revealed that the American military is pursuing new types of exotic bombs - including a new class of isomeric gamma ray weapons. Unlike conventional atomic and hydrogen bombs, the new weapons would trigger the release of energy by absorbing radiation, and respond by re-emitting a far more powerful radiation. In this new category of gamma-ray weapons, a nuclear isomer absorbs x-rays and re-emits higher frequency gamma rays. The emitted gamma radiation has been reported to release 60 times the energy of the x-rays that trigger the effect.

Don't you just love it when atomic and hydrogen bombs are referred to as "conventional"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashmanonar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #29
42. "gamma-ray weapons"
so we all turn into the incredible hulk? COOOOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #42
51. Find the right nuclear isomer and you could be the hulk.
Then again they just might blink out the Universe or alter reality like in Quantum Leap.

That would teach those terrorist a good lesson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashmanonar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #51
70. indeed!
it's like bush made a challenge to Osama: i've seen a sigline pic with this on it, "OSama! i will destroy america before you!"

sounds about right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
17. A fireball ain't shit
I did the same thing in my microwave once...gravity was affected too, it made me drop things...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vSmith Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
18. Maybe, or consider this:
One could ask:

How small would we have to compress these nuclei to make a black hole?

G = 1.19 x 10-31 GeV-1 cm3 s-2.
c = 3.0 10^10 cm / s
M = 4x10^4 GeV

So we would have to squish it all into a radius of 5.29x10^-48 cm to make a black hole.

The size of a proton is 1x10-15cm, a gold nucleus starts off at being ~7x10-15cm. If we perfectly collide the 2 nuclei, we can not squish them any smaller than that. So we are numerous orders of magnitude away.

In the case of real Black Holes (from Stars), consider the Sun.

Sun Mass = 1.989 x 10^33 g.

You would need to squeeze all that mass within 3 km in order for light not to be able to escape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #18
27. That's exactly what I was gonna post...
nah.... not really :D ... Welcome to DU, vSmith. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #18
30. Sounded ridiculous to me, good to see the calculations
Thermal radiation = hawking radiation? I'd like to see what kinda shoes the scientists were wearing to leap to that conclusion.

The radiation emitted from black holes either flows from tons of matter swirling in at incredible speeds, or from spontaneously generated particles that split up and would normally annihilate each other - but one of them falls in and the other flies off as (I think) hawking radiation. Even if we did create a tiny black hole, it is not capable of generating either form of radiation... provided my understanding is correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Find a source of X-Rays "atomic explosion" to give off gamma radiation.
The black hole would not have to last very long and you get a better bomb.

An old acquaintance I met as teenager in the 1960's got questioned (short time) circa 1940's for speculating about "Atomic Bomb" in a science fiction story (Robert Heinlein). This time the speculation is much more common but who knows or will admit what the wizards are cooking up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
47. I thought the smallest anything could possibly be
was, what is the Plank length 10^-33? Anything shorter than that could not become a 'real' particle because what makes matter is energy like 'strings' that are plank length vibrating at some harmonic according to the energy level. Side note would mean, whatever it is that is vibrating, would need a minimum of 6 strings and 4 nodes to make the smallest elementary particle with a length of each edge being the plank length, at least in 3d space. But all this is hypothetical.

I would question anything 'real' proposed to be smaller than a plank length.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #18
50. Say, I bet you studied art history in school, right?
Welcome to DU. Thanks for your informative post.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frederik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #18
64. Thanks!
That's reassuring... I hope. Black holes don't grow, do they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
20. Thanks for posting...
...:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
21. ok -- they can stop doing that now.
that qualifies as ''scaring the horses''.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. They'll continue to do it
AND they'll say you are crazy if you say that. You have to say it is blasphemous or against God to get them to stop doing something hideous nowadays. Honestly. It works every time. Stem cell research is seen as hideous simply because someone said it was blasphemous and against God. Now, no cures for diseases will be found that way. MOAB (Mother of all bombs) was created to fight the Muslim "threat". Therefore, it is "godly" and good.

???

Moral of the story. Cures for diseases evil and bad. Bombs and technology that can be used to make more sophisticated ways to kill people moral and good.

Don't ask me to explain the logic. I, personally, don't understand it. It's just how things work nowadays...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeCajun Donating Member (167 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #25
53. Ever read "Guns, Germs, and Steel"?
Our being the vectors of deadly diseases is probably one of the things that contriubuted to the current supremacy of the large city and of the city state and by extension, the nation state. The amount of breeding ground for bacteria and viruses around us in a city environment makes our mere presence deadly to people without the level of resistance to these diseases. More disease good, means more dead enemies. More bombs good, means more dead enemies. Of course, this begs the question of the morality of attacking a group of people who are technologically less well-equipped and who have done nothing to provoke us... Who else has a sawbuck on Jr being abused as a child and taking that same scenario out on the whole world?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frederik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #25
65. Can't we convince
the fundies that this kind of activity qualifies as black magic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
22. could they please repeat a larger version of this in Crawford?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
26. Now if we could just entangle two black holes,
maybe when we put something in one, it will come out the other.

Maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Awesome.
There are so many horrifically insulting and funny ways to interperet your post... Excellent job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
34. When I first started using a computer in 2001 there was a story about
some Norwegian scientists that had produced small black holes in their lab. All I can recall is that was on BBC sometime in the Spring or early Summer. I wish I would have saved that link.

No doubt small black holes are being replicated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
37. "do not be alarmed..."
Official government sources indicate that this was a simple, ordinary black hole formation. "Don't be silly, the universe is full of them. If they were such a danger, why did God make so many of them?"

The official also stressed that the public should not read anything into the code-name for the project: "operation RaptureTaxi"

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frederik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #37
66. LOL
I guess... :nuke: :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
39. playing god
I've read that a lab-created black hole could result in the destruction of this universe and the creation of a new one.

Imagine: how did this one come about? Someone messing about in a lab...

DODODODO (twilight zone theme music)


Sue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
40. How do we send the neocons into the black hole?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. That is what they emerged from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durablend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #41
67. I don't trust that they wouldn't find some way back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skip fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
45. Boy do I feel better!!! I was afraid that nanotechnology
Edited on Fri Mar-18-05 03:50 PM by skip fox
would do us in (self-replicating, as _Scientific American_ specualted, and turning the earth and all existing things thereon and therein into "gray goo"). Now, while they're creating black holes in the lab, those tiny machines will at least give them competition. (And that's what drives capitlism, right?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
46. "The Ethics of Human Extinction" by John Leslie
A book that addresses this issue quite extensively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #46
52. Maybe somewhere in the Universe there is a species that has survived.
They should strongly be considering the desireablity of human infestation playing with Physics they do not understand.

Such as in the "Day the Earth Stood Still".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #46
54. Can't invent new and cheap energy sources but they can create Black
holes in search of a bigger and better weapon....:::sigh::
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #54
73. Cheaper energy HAS been invented.
It is called Thermal Depolyermizaton

http://www.changingworldtech.com./index.asp

http://forums.biodieselnow.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=829

It has been written about in both Discover and Scientific American. Both of those are genuine reputable science magazines. The first plant is up and running in Carthage, MO. It is a small scale plant but is producing 500 barrels of oil per day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
56. I MUST object to this thread on the grounds that
Edited on Fri Mar-18-05 05:56 PM by dbt
1. It will make us all look like kooks and (gasp!) Conspiracy Theorists in the eyes of those who support our Dear Leader.

2. It COULD lead to more discussions of (booga! booga!) CHEMTRAILS!

3. We certainly wouldn't want either of these outcomes, now would we?

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryWhiteLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
57. Hmmm...maybe this is an example of pure research that need not go further.
Ripping apart the fabric of space doesn't sound like a very good idea to me. At some point, the quest for knowledge must yield when the quest starts to threaten our very existence...

JB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #57
63. I wonder is someone said the same thing about bring home FIRE??? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buns_of_Fire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
58. But will Ronco come out with a home version?
Kids! You, too, can have your own Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider Just Like The One Dad Uses! Create your own black holes! It's fun!

(Not recommended for children under five or seriously deranged Presidents. Your mileage may vary. We are not responsible for disappearances of pets, bullies, or major metropolitan areas.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rukkyg Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
59. A black hole
A black hole is just a normal piece of matter that's so dense that light can't escape the surface. If it's friggin amazingly small, it has a friggin amazingly small mass, and therefore will have the same gravitational effect on its surroundings as a toaster. That's why they say that gravity is not the dominant force.

And I'm not sure, but considering that the particles were traveling at near light speeds, as soon as they turn off the particle accelerator, the particles would stop going so fast, and would stop being a "black hole" shortly thereafter.

All this talk of "boy is this dangerous" is silly.


Black hole is a pop term, by the way. It's called a quantum singularity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sleipnir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
60. "They call it Ice-9...."
"See the cat, see the cradle"


More prophetic words could not be spoken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
61. "Disaster Scenarios"
John Marburger, Director
Brookhaven National Laboratory
October 6, 1999

Three different kinds of "disaster" scenarios have been discussed
in connection with high energy particle collisions:

A. Creation of a black hole that would "eat" ordinary matter.
B. Initiation of a transition to a new more stable universe.
C. Formation of a "strangelet" that would convert ordinary matter to a new form.

http://www.phys.utk.edu/rhip/Articles/RHICNews/BNL_rhicreport.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biftonnorton Donating Member (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
62. Shhhh! Don't Leak This To The Conservative Christians!
If it ain't in the bible, it ain't nothing but theory, and must be... of... Satan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
68. Man, the teenagers of the future are gonna have so much fun!
We had to shoot spitballs. They're gonna be able to shoot min-black holes. It will probably sound real cool too, ripping spacetime as it flies across the classroom.

I mean, lasers are like SO last generation.

Hell, the next iPod will probably use a black hole for it's storage medium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC