Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Greenspan sees oil-price spike as short-lived (Marketwatch)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:02 PM
Original message
Greenspan sees oil-price spike as short-lived (Marketwatch)
Greenspan: crude inventories could ease price frenzy By Greg Robb

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- Fed chief Alan Greenspan said the current spike in oil prices may not be long-lived. Greenspan noted that futures prices for delivery of oil for summer delivery exceed spot prices. "That will likely support increased inventories of crude oil. If sustained, these market technicals could encourage enough of an inventory buffer to damp the current price frenzy," Greenspan said in a speech prepared for delivery Tuesday for the National Petrochemical and Refiners Association. Greenspan did not hazard a guess at the impact of current high oil prices on the U.S. economy, or discuss the potential impact on inflation. Some economists believe the higher energy prices will lead to slower economic growth in the second quarter.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/newsfinder/pulseone.asp?guid={948284FF-4C34-44B8-A897-688E02F184D6}&siteid=mktw



Translation : the higher oil prices go up....the less the people can afford to "drive to work"

Therefore....the high prices will reduce consumption.......Brilliant.

You can all go back to shopping and wait for the next "pearl of wisdom".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. My hubby read an article that said oil would be up to $100.00 a barrel
by the end of the year. Greenspan is such a fuckwad, who cares what he says, it will be in support of the neo-fascist agenda either way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. uh oh
Greenspan has been 180 degrees wrong on almost everything recently - glad I ride my bike to work every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Like the Chinese Will Pay $100/barrel for Oil!
What, do you think they're made of money? No more so than we.

This is just like the California Electricity gouge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Well
Think Walmart and other goods manufactured in China. A whole lot of money is being pumped into China.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. The Chinese are ready to pay A LOT for oil
Edited on Tue Apr-05-05 01:45 PM by TexasLawyer
I'm in a position to know about this. They are buying up production rights all over the world, and they have the huge cash reserves to pay at the going rate. (Our trade deficit is the Chinese trade SURPLUS).

A huge consideration for the Chinese is not gasoline for automobiles (although that is important), it is oil for petrochemical production, particularly plastics. You can use coal to fire a generator, but you can't use coal to make Barbie dolls and cell phones.

The Chinese intend to hold onto their manufacturing jobs, and they are aggressively investing for that purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. China's recent oil deals
China's recent oil deals:
Iran, Venezuela, Brazil, Cuba, Saudi Arabia


U.S.' recent oil deals:
*crickets*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordmadr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. U.S. recent oil deals...
1) Iraq
2) ANWR

Pending:
1) Iran
2) Venezuela
3) Syria

Olaf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. U.S.' recent oil deals haven't panned out
Thanks to pipeline attacks this week, no oil is being pumped and exported from Iraq. Iraqi oil revenues have almost completely collapsed in recent months.

ANWR won't go into production for almost a decade. Too little, too late.


Iran, Venezuela and Syria can protect themselves, unlike Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordmadr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Yeah, not panning out at all...I should have indicated my sarcasm.
It seems our country doesn't seem to think there is much oil left to be found, and no one seems to have any cheap extra. This creates a supply issue, which it seems this administration is determined to ATTEMPT to solve by force.

Energy wars BAD...

Olaf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. They have BILLIONS OF WALMART DOLLARS for their crappy stuff
And no place to spend the monopoly money. Remember its worth a whole lot less than it used to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. The difference is
Edited on Tue Apr-05-05 02:40 PM by Tempest
China is paying for the oil using its surplus of U.S. dollars.

The U.S. is paying for oil by issuing more debt.


So who's in the position of strength? Who can hold out the longest and not suffer any consequences?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. It's always a question
of staying power, isn't it? You're right: who can hold out the longest in a war of wills? Answer = not us.

Picture the US as a fat, bloated tub of lard, reaching waaaay up in the cupboard to find one last Twinkie. Stretches with all his might. Curses. Empty.

What to do? The point of desperation is reached in about 25 seconds....no long hesitation there.

The answer is that the US would not even last 1 week without our precious Black Gold. Not even 1 day. Visualize the Middle Ages.

This also explains the extreme belligerence and hostility with the Bush Administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well he's been extremely forthcoming, clear, and accurate with the info
up til now, so I see no reason to doubt it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. So true. No one can ever accuse Greenspan of being a cheerleader
for this economy. You can always expect the straight dope from him.

Ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. LOL...here is more. "Don't tell people...have to keep the markets going"
Greenspan said policymakers should be careful about how they respond to the
energy crunch. "To be sure, energy issues present policymakers and citizens
with difficult decisions and tradeoffs to make outside the market process," he
said. "But those concerns, one hopes, will be addressed in a manner that, to
the greatest extent possible, does not distort or stifle the meaningful
function of our markets."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordmadr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yeah, I loved that part...
the market is being affected by energy, but don't tell anyone...we don't want to create a panic that would shock the market.

So, putting all of that information out there would make people worry? Why would it do that if there wasn't something to worry about? Juat let the market fucntion as long as it can and everything will be just fine...trust me.

Olaf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. There may be tradeoffs between food or utilities for the commoners
but don't dare let that effect market profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Greenspan...he's become the Fed's Drudge.
*********BREAKING*********
MORE GREENSPAN PARTISAN HACK SHIT!

I stopped listening to that fossil after the shrub tax cut cheerleading he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UCLA Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. fossil. nice...still snickering
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. Greenspan is a liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underthedome Donating Member (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. I agree with GS. So why is Bush filling up the reserves? A ty to big oil
Edited on Tue Apr-05-05 01:54 PM by underthedome
Oil prices will come down as more production facilities come online. But filling up the U.S. reserves at these prices makes no sense other than to further line big oils pockets (and his own).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
15. Sure Greenspan and those surpluses were a danger to the economy
:eyes: He's such a political hack it makes me sick! :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UCLA Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
19. Wow. What insight. Now what is it we pay him for again???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
25. Greenspan you four eyed bastard
What the fuck do you know about the world's oil supply?

Deal with monetary policy and shut the fuck up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
26. Greenie schilling for dubya again. He is such a schill. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC