Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Navajo council outlaws uranium mining

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 06:54 PM
Original message
Navajo council outlaws uranium mining
Cheney and pals will not be happy about this ...

Apr 20, 2005, 09:58 pm

WINDOW ROCK, Ariz. — Uranium mining and processing will be outlawed on the Navajo reservation if President Joseph Shirley signs a bill passed Tuesday morning by the Navajo Nation Council.

The Dine´ Natural Resources Protection Act of 2005, which as amended prior to the vote bans uranium mining and processing anywhere in the Navajo Nation, passed by a vote of 63-19.

Shiprock delegates Richard Begaye and Wallace Charley voted no on the measure.

Shiprock delegate Pete Atcitty, Hogback delegate Ervin Keeswood Sr. and Upper Fruitland delegate Lorenzo Bates voted yes.

The vote came after a heated debate focused on several amendments. One change that would have deleted a 25-year moratorium on uranium processing was defeated, while another passed that deleted the moratorium but called for processing to be unconditionally banned. The approved amendment also struck language that would have allowed individuals wishing to mine or process uranium to seek approval from several committees of the Navajo Council.

The final language read: “No person shall engage in uranium mining and processing on any sites within Navajo Indian Country.”

“It’s very simple, uranium kills,” said delegate Mark Maryboy of Mexican Water/Aneth/Red Mesa during the debate.


more...

http://www.daily-times.com/artman/publish/article_18006.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. good for them!
they have ben poisoned and ripped off long enough!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GiovanniC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Time For a New Trail of Tears
Bush'll git them redskins movin' to some worthless land right quick, I reckon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chlamor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. No More Stealing Thunder




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is hypocritical
Coal kills far more people than any uranium related activities every did or will. Error! Will Robinson Error!


Indian Tribes with current or potential coal mining activities on their lands include:

Crow Tribe

Hopi Tribe

Navajo Nation

Northern Cheyenne Tribe

Southern Ute Tribe

Ute Mountain Ute Tribe

http://www.wrcc.osmre.gov/Indlnds.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCDemo Donating Member (847 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Coal is not used as a weapon to kill people
I think that's the difference...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I stand by my statement
Edited on Wed Apr-20-05 09:09 PM by wuushew
even factoring in atomic deaths due to American employment of nuclear weapons and poisoning during the cold war, the sum total of deaths from the use of coal starting from its first use in heating and in steel production onward far outstrips those of uranium.

This appears to be a argument based on intent and not one based on utilitarianism.

(On Edit) Coal can be used as a weapon as it has for centuries, to forge guns, to power the military industrial complex, to fire locomotive boilers in troop trains or ships of war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Uranium mining has caused a great deal of suffering for the people of
the Navajo Nation.

A brief history of uranium mining on the Navajo Nation:

http://dinecare.indigenousnative.org/history.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Thanks for that link
that group appears to do good work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chlamor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Be clear on this
there are many many in the Four Corners area who do not want Peabody stripping their land. the decision makers in the Tribal councils do not always reflect the will of the Native Americans. Sound familiar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-21-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. Even if your premise held water (which it doesn't)
Edited on Thu Apr-21-05 03:12 PM by Eloriel
by ALL means let's:

* hold the Navajo responsible for ALL native tribes

* hold them to a higher standard of coherence and (in your mind, I suppose) "integrity" than we hold any other individual or group of humans (ya might look at any given Repug in office, for starters)

* hold Navajo responsible for coal deaths in ways we don't hold the extraction industries themselves responsible for

Your post is highly offensive. I consider it racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yay Dine'! At least one government in this land has some common sense
"The Dine´ Natural Resources Protection Act of 2005, which as amended prior to the vote bans uranium mining and processing anywhere in the Navajo Nation, passed by a vote of 63-19."
:woohoo:
63-19?

The people of the US respectfully request that the Navajo Nation Council take full control of the US government ASAP.

Please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. GW might get that lesson on the definition of "sovereign"
better get the dictionary out quick

So, any takers on when we invade the Navajo Nation? (again)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Good one!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Point_n_click Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. JDAMs falling in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ...
Edited on Wed Apr-20-05 10:27 PM by Point_n_click
Afterall, they have a supply of accessable uranium, who's to say they won't try to make it into weapons to blackmail the U.S. government into surrendering ancient tribal lands back to them. Maybe they're holding the uranium back to get a better price on the terrorist black market. This calls for a pre-emptive strike to protect 'Merka from those heathen, non-white, savages!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colorado Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. Right on. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azndndude Donating Member (484 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-21-05 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
15. I am Navajo and am PROUD of my Tribal Council!
It's about time. Uranium kills whatever it touches forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-21-05 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. I'm proud of your Tribal Council too. They do better than our screwed
up Congress!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-21-05 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
16. This ban will last maybe 10 yrs
Until dwindling fossil fuel supplies force us to build more nuclear reactors. Either that, or other areas will be mined in nearby communities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-21-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Longer than ten years.
The United States has thousands of tons of "bomb" grade U-235 and plutonium horded away for military use, and so much "depleted" Uranium that we can afford to shoot up Iraq with it. A mix of "bomb grade" and depleted Uranium is what "conventional" reactors use as fuel. (Other reactor designs can use any sort of uranium or thorium for fuel.)

The history of uranium mining on Indian lands is very ugly. If the Indians choose to leave their remaining Uranium in the ground, good for them. It is a very reasonable and ethical decision.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-21-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. NVMojo
Per DU copyright rules
please post only four
paragraphs from the
copyrighted news source.


Thank you.


DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chlamor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-21-05 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
22. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC