BadNews
(244 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-22-05 08:29 PM
Original message |
Benedict's Landslide the Biggest in History |
Kagemusha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-22-05 08:32 PM
Response to Original message |
1. What do you think JP2 was doing all these years?... |
|
No, he and Ratzinger removed them all.
End of story.
|
onehandle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-22-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. Cardinals aren't removed. |
|
They have successors named once they've retired or died.
|
kikiek
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-22-05 08:32 PM
Response to Original message |
2. A chaplin I know said John Paul assembled a group of cardinals that would |
LittleClarkie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-22-05 08:38 PM
Response to Original message |
3. You'd think they voted electronically |
|
Did all the Cardinals get to vote? How long was the line?
I bet that wasn't even the real ballots that went up in smoke.
Fraud, I say. FRAUD!!
|
Pirate Smile
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-22-05 08:39 PM
Response to Original message |
4. On CNN a couple of days ago, their reporter said that the last |
|
Pope changed the rules so that after a certain number of days only a simple majority was needed to elect the next Pope.
Cardinal Ratzinger had over 50% but not the 2/3rds needed.
The 50% made it clear they would just wait the number of days if necessary for Ratzinger to become Pope.
Some of the rest obviously decided it wasn't worth it to wait.
|
davidinalameda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-22-05 08:56 PM
Response to Original message |
6. JP2 appointed most of the current cardinals |
|
and changes the rule so only cardinals under a certain age could vote
it got rid of the older ones who remember what Vatician 2 actually meant and it strengthened the neo-traditionists who run the church now
|
Straight Shooter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-22-05 10:06 PM
Response to Original message |
7. So, The Powers That Be change the rules to ensure continuation |
|
of the same Powers That Be.
As the Church Lady would say, "My, my, isn't that special?"
|
bullwinkle428
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-22-05 10:14 PM
Response to Original message |
8. I'm now convinced that some of Ratzinger's |
|
behind the scenes maneuvering included getting Diebold involved in the papal voting process...
|
fasttense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-23-05 06:28 AM
Response to Original message |
9. No, we've been told to shut up and go away. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:57 AM
Response to Original message |