Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SAIC TO PAY $2.5 MILLION TO SETTLE FALSE CLAIMS AT KELLY AIR FORCE BASE

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 06:44 PM
Original message
SAIC TO PAY $2.5 MILLION TO SETTLE FALSE CLAIMS AT KELLY AIR FORCE BASE
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP. TO PAY $2.5 MILLION TO SETTLE FALSE CLAIMS AT KELLY AIR FORCE BASE IN TEXAS

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) has agreed to pay the United States $2.5 million to settle allegations that it made false claims and engaged in defective pricing on delivery orders with the Air Force for environmental clean-up at Kelly Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas. SAIC, a San Diego-based research and engineering company, provides information technology to commercial and government customers.

i-Newswire, 2005-04-29 - The government’s complaint alleged that the corporation knowingly failed to disclose information about its costs during price negotiations with the Air Force, as required by the federal Truth in Negotiations Act. The lawsuit alleged that SAIC, in internally developing its cost and price proposals, utilized hidden management reserves to inflate its estimates of the amount of labor hours it would require to complete the delivery orders, but never told the Air Force about the reserves or the padded hours.

“Today’s settlement again demonstrates the United States' commitment to protecting the federal government from contractor fraud and abuse,” said Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General for the Department's Civil Division. "The United States relies on the honesty of its contractors to provide accurate billing information.”

The settlement resolves an action under the qui tam or whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act, filed by Michael Dwight Woodlee in January 2002. The Justice Department joined the action in August 2004, and filed the government’s complaint one month later.

more
http://i-newswire.com/pr17781.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Now why is SAIC being forced to pay when Halliburton doesn't?
Are they not both favored by BushCo?

Halliburton doesn't have to pay when fraud is discovered. Wonder why SAIC has to pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. No Halliburton affiliation
+ small 'taters, that'll get ya busted every time.

“Today’s settlement again demonstrates the United States' commitment to protecting the federal government from contractor fraud and abuse,"

Make an example while Bush*'s friends loot billions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. SAIC were the ones who blessed the voting machines
and while not as big as Halliburton, SAIC gets billions from fed contracts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daphne08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Say what?
"Today’s settlement again demonstrates the United States' commitment to protecting the federal government from contractor fraud..."

Don't get me started!! :rant:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC