From the Southern Baptist News,
http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=20751Apparently, the Southern Baptist Convention is trying to distance itself from the removal of the North Carolina 9.
Snip: "I believe it would never -- never -- be appropriate or acceptable for a local Baptist church to decide membership based upon how a person votes."
Snip:
"I believe that preachers and pastors have a responsibility and an obligation to preach what the Bible says about moral, social public policy issues and to encourage people to vote, and when they vote, to vote their values, their beliefs and their convictions. But the decision about the candidate must remain part of the individual responsibility of the priesthood of all believers. A person's casting of a ballot should never be a cause for church discipline."
Even if a person voted against a constitutional marriage amendment -- similar to what will be on the ballot in at least four states next year -- it would not be cause for church discipline, Land said.
"They need to be at church more than anybody else to hear why they need to change their mind," Land said of a person voting against a marriage amendment. "If you remove them from membership then you've lost the opportunity to share with them and to help them understand that they need to strongly support traditional marriage."
This leaves the door open for a favorite Baptist activity, rebuking from the pulpit. Their position is interetsting and not surprising, and can be summarized as, 'If we kick them out, we can't have them to brainwash anymore.'