Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Study: Sexual Orientation is "Hard-wired."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Brucey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 04:36 PM
Original message
Study: Sexual Orientation is "Hard-wired."
http://news.yahoo.com/fc?tmpl=fc&cid=34&in=world&cat=gays_and_lesbians

The origins of sexual orientation may be evident in the blink of an eye. In what is the first study to show an apparent link between a non-learned trait and sexual orientation, British researchers have discovered the way peoples' eyes respond to sudden loud noises may signal differences between heterosexual and homosexual men and women that were developed before birth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. This ought to send the anti-gay fundies into a tizzy.....
Of course they will now go out of their way to claim the study was erroneous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. But, but ... many of them seem to be sure it's a 'choice' ...
Edited on Mon Oct-06-03 04:46 PM by TahitiNut
... maybe because it was such an agonizing 'choice' for so many of them? :eyes:

Methinks they protesteth too much. So sad; so conflicted; so unfulfilled. :silly:

I'm ceaselessly amazed at how often people can have the same experience and interpret it so differently. It's not just a river in Egypt, it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
45. Only because they have to fight so hard against the inclination.
The people who say "choice" are choosing to deny the truth about themselves. The rest of us know we have no choice. We like who we like. We love who we love.

Who on earth gets turned on by "choice"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. They'll more likely say the study is biased...
Edited on Mon Oct-06-03 05:22 PM by Wednesdays
because the scientists who conducted it are just a bunch of liberals pushing their agenda. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. I used to work where a fundy was pres
we were not allowed to send correspondence out that had the word erroneous in it. Errata either. The reason, erroneous looks much too much like erogenous. Erotic for Errata. Geez, I miss that place, it was at least a laugh a day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Get out! No way! Really? That's just flat out demented!
Holy cow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zekeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
40. Serious
it was a publishing firm, part of a fortune 500 conglomerate. It was the most screwed up place I could ever imagine working. I gave it nearly a decade of my life and surely have much more gray hair than I would otherwise. Memories of this kind of insanity make it almost worth while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaumont58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. They almost have to!
If they were to believe that sexual orientation is NOT a choice, than they would have to admit their own cruelty, for a large, large segment of Christianity and Judism has been very cruel to gays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
schultzee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
38. There is one in vote.com whose whole life is anti-disney gay day
and her signateur is anti-gay. I can't imagine storing up all that hate. And these people are religious? Sure. She, of course, believes everything that the administration says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loyal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. I posted this in civil rights/equality/privacy
already, Brucey. Don't know if you know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursacorwin Donating Member (528 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. this is bad
first off, let me state that i do believe it is 'hard wired' that is, that there is a biological component to being gay.

that said- this is the last thing we want 'discovered.' why? because as soon as they do, you can bet money on the fact that dozens of groups will spring up overnight, counseling couples on what they need to do to avoid the horror of gay children. after that, groups will step up and offer families treatments which will 'correct' this 'disability' with drugs and surgery. eventually, employers with 'family values' clauses will force new hires to take genetic tests, to 'prove' they don't carry the gay gene.


i'm a dyke, and i'm happy to be one. but the last thing i want to see is for my whole existence to be reduced to some gene, it's a vastly oversimplified approach to why i am what i am. part of me is because i was 'born this way' but part of me is what i have fashioned myself into, thanks to nature, culture, education, and experience. no gene contains all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Then we play the eugenics card.
Once it's proven that it's part of god's natural design or evolution we simply point out that any attempts to correct homosexuality in utero is a form of eugenics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Well, there's a 'biological component' to race, too.
It's as true today as yesterday: We have to be taught to hate. All such hatred seems to attack love itself - whom other people find themselves in love with. It is one of the most appalling of human failings: to somehow think that how and whom people love is any kind of problem whatsoever in a world so overrun with the problems of how and whom people hate. It's the root of such evils we must always address: hatred itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
28. I don't see that happening so much
Yes there may be people who would abort a homosexual child, or who would adopt rather than have one. But I don't think that would be a huge group of people and in any case, would you want some poor homosexual baby to be born to one of those people?
Heterosexual and homosexual fetus are getting aborted now anyway and that is not going to change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Doesn't surprise me at all.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Science...we don't need no stinkin science....remember the dark ages?
Old dark ages same as the new dark ages!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. I thought this had already been well established by research
Sounds right to me, and most of my gay friends agree based on their own personal experiences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
29. Only in the United States
Efforts to reproduce the homosexual twin studies came up with the opposite results in other Western nations, such as Austrailia. Was there something wrong w/ the methodology here? The methodology there? Is it something about American culture?

Another recent study found that homosexuals were seven times as likely to have been molested as children, strongly suggesting that environment plays an important role. Rarely are things all nature or all nurture; a biologic predisposition does not mean a guarantee of homosexuality, merely an increased likelihood.

Like you, many of my gay friends agree that they were gay at birth -- but fully half of them (five, off the top of my head) swear that they made a conscious choice, or some other life-event led them to be gay. I really don't even care WHY they're gay, 'cept maybe intellectual curiosity. What diffrence could it possibly make to me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreigncorrespondent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #29
43. I can remember the day...
...when I decided I was going to follow my life path as a lesbian.

When I was born, I was attracted to other girls. Growing up I was attracted to other teenage girls. In my adult life I have always been attracted to women, yet I chose to live a straight life believing that is what I was meant to do.

Yet I can remember the day I told my ex (male) that I could no longer live a lie, that I am a lesbian. I had been born a lesbian, but had fought it all my life.

The only choice I made was to stop living a lie, and begin living my life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trent21 Donating Member (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #29
48. I've never seen a credible study that says that
Edited on Tue Oct-07-03 01:06 AM by trent21
"Another recent study found that homosexuals were seven times as likely to have been molested as children, strongly suggesting that environment plays an important role."

Where did you see this study? I've yet to see a cridible study (outside of FRC and other Fundie fake studies) that show anything of the sort. So where did you supposedly see this one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's like being right or left handed...
Does anyone choose which they're going to be? I think not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Not really, but some people set out to be ambidextrous on
their own.

Personally, I think it's some combination of both biology and environment, with biology tending to play a larger part in the process.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. The effort to be ambidextrous is a choice...
but it's not natural. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. I've always believed sexual preference is hard-wired.
I don't think it's a choice, any more than height, race, eye color, or any other feature you're born with. Tahiti Nut is right, the ones who so loudly oppose being gay are really just using that as an excuse to hate.

When my younger kids were teen-agers, 20 years ago, one of our dear friends, who was my daughter's age, struggled with accepting his orientation. Believe me, the agony that this kid suffered by being gay in a very conservative school district in Texas is nothing anybody would go through by choice.

Today, he and his partner have been together many years, have a beautiful home, and many loving friends. My children and I still stay in close touch with him. He's happy today, but the struggle he went through is not anything somebody decides to do on a whim.

Let the fundies, and narrow minded, spiteful conservatives, tend to their own lives and leave the rest of us alone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocketdem Donating Member (496 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
47. What if it is a choice?
Then so what?

I've never understood what the hubbub is. Personally, I've always beleived that it was something intrinsic, but even if it isn't, so what?

Why should I not be allowed to love anyone that I want? Why should I face discrimination based upon whom I love?

The fundies will screech and yell no matter what science does or does not prove. That's what they do, screech and holler and moan and wail. That's how they think they buy their way to everlasting heaven. Good for them.

In a free society there can never be any justification for differentiation in the law or discrimination based upon consenting, adult sexual preference. Period. And this is independent of whether it's a matter of nature or nuture or personal whim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
16. Know any gay kids in grade school?
I knew two for sure. 40 years ago, before the gay movement. Everybody around knew it. Both grew up to be gay and both died of AIDS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. With 20/20 hindsight, yes I did
A neighbor of mine, a kid that I used to spend quite a lot of time with around age 10. He's dead from AIDS.

By high school it was abundantly clear who was gay and who was not, with very few exceptions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
veganwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. im not sure what the last part...
of you post has anything to do with the first part.

the sentence structure seems to imply that getting AIDS is caused simplying from being gay or that they deserved it or whatever.

it draws up memories of that one fundie woman who said, in reference to the gay realities shows, that real gay reality tv would show 5 men dying of aids.

maybe im just reading too much. its been a long day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Just the facts. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Not really "just the facts"....
rather a deliberate juxtaposition to imply an ineluctible relationship... which is NOT the case. A rather disdainful and ugly implication at that, I might add.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Wrong and unacceptably presumtuous.
Go have a drink. See a specialist. Do something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Wrong?
I don't think so. I choose to retain my presumption. Your passive-aggressivity is showing miserably.

I don't drink. I don't need a specialist. I am doing something... I am refuting your inauspicious statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Yes, utterly wrong.
You have invented a pack of bullshit. I am encouraging you to seek help in finding a way out of your unbelievable arrogance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. "I am encouraging you to seek help..."
Transparent as glass. 'Nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selwynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
37. I knew three guys and one girl that I thought
Edited on Mon Oct-06-03 07:28 PM by Cat Atomic
were clearly gay from 4th grade on. Well- I just noticed they were different in 4th grade, and never thought they might be gay until about 7th grade.

All have remained friends of mine. Two of the guys are indeed gay today, as is the girl.

The third guy went the opposte way, joining the military. After that, he worked in Alaska as a deep water diver for some sort of oil industry stuff. He got married, and seems happy enough to me.

But you know what- everyone in high school thought *I* was gay. I only discovered this upon visiting my high school reunion, where several (drunk) people became extremely relaxed and chummy, and expressed their surprise at my female date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
schultzee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
39. I knew a family that had an adoped child who was very feminine
in voice, walk, actions when he was 4 years old. They noticed this and sent him to see a clinical psychologist, and he grew up to become a very effeminate gay man, despite the therapy. He was adopted as an infant by a hetrosexual couple. To me that is some evidence that it is biological.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
18. I'm already sure this study is crap
And I haven't even read it yet.
Once I get done my day of hell, I'll see if that opinion stands up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
19. Oh, fun! Let's test Falwell, Robertson, that evil Topeka, KS dude...
...who else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. Here's a dillemma for the reich wingers...
If sexual orientation is proven to be inborn, will the Robertsons and Falwells of the world suddenly become proponents of abortion. (Provided the fetus is a "sodomite", of course.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
26. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
32. Fascinating stuff.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
35. Who cares?
I've read many opinions and studies during a half century. And personally I don't give a goddamn as long as you know that your freedom ends where my nose begins.

So if your trying to convince me of your two for a nickle and one for a dime BS, forget it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
36. I am not an "anti-gay fundi"
Edited on Mon Oct-06-03 07:50 PM by kenzee13
nor am I literate enough in science to have an opinion about the merits of this particular study, but the interpretive remarks in the full story at Yahoo are so culture-bound, and so biased, that to my ear they reflect a very judgemental expression of heterosexism.

on edit: I realized after hitting the post that the leader I used could be interpreted, in light of the original post, as disputing the genetic basis for sexual orientation. To be clear, I neither dispute nor fully agree with that conclusion. Several posts, ursacorwin's, khephra's, others, made thoughtful comments about the difficulty of assigning causation to human behaviour in either genes or environment. We are so much more complex. I also think that the sort of absolute demarcation between hetero-and homo-sexual behavior that seems to be presented in these studies is suspect and incongruent with reality. But I DO worry that basing policy arguement on genetic grounds is dangerous and can backfire; the civil rights issues, though more controversy provoking, are stronger and better and worth the fight in the long run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
schultzee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. There are other stories that I have read that were done in Seattle
Washington that are supposed to be sound.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
schultzee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Studies, not stories. lol typing too fast
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whirlygigspin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. BANG!
eyes wide open? hmmmm.
better not squint!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
46. Did you hear that Jerry Falwell????
Oh yeah, like he's going to listen to reason anyway. I like Sharptons's quote: "It's time for the Christian Right to meet the Right Christians."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberator_Rev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
49. Need any help fighting for the Liberation of GLBT?
We have gathered some great, free, materials to help secure freedom and equality for GLBT's at

http://www.LiberalsLikeChrist.Org/equality4gays


See what Christ might say about the "Christian Coalition" & "Religious Right" imposters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC