|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:14 AM Original message |
AP: Supreme Court Won't Hear CIA Leak Case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
1. There is a God...he loves us all so much... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:18 AM Response to Original message |
2. YES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:22 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Hopefully Ms. Miller's new wardrobe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mom cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 11:59 AM Response to Reply #7 |
47. May be she can get fashion advice from Martha, or at least some advice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mbperrin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:19 AM Response to Original message |
3. Judith's goin' to jail! Judith's goin' to jail! Judith's goin' to jail! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VegasWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 08:04 PM Response to Reply #3 |
80. I would like to see that fat pig Novack go to prision. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr.Green93 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:19 AM Response to Original message |
4. Woo Hoo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnnInLa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:19 AM Response to Original message |
5. Not sure I understand all the ramifications, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Me. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:24 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. They Can Make Such A Law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 01:48 PM Response to Reply #8 |
60. The coward will blab their GUTS OUT. Then be silenced. No MSM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
6. What should be Judith Millers prison name? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scurrilous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:24 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Neo-con con. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:25 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. If I said it I'd get banned (or the msg deleted at least) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:44 AM Response to Reply #6 |
15. Curveball. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mandate My Ass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:46 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. ROFL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:44 AM Response to Reply #6 |
16. Spitball. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bear425 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:49 AM Response to Reply #6 |
20. Sis. Stenographer in Stripes? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlGore-08.com (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
11. Ummm... Judith Miller aside... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rose Siding (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:41 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Possibly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darkhawk32 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:44 AM Original message |
I don't think so... let me elaborate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McSpazitron (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
18. I agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darkhawk32 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:53 AM Response to Reply #18 |
22. I don't think that the actual leaking of the information is against the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McSpazitron (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 03:36 PM Response to Reply #22 |
73. I'm pretty sure that the law says.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 10:00 AM Response to Reply #18 |
25. Deep Throat broke the law also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darkhawk32 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 10:05 AM Response to Reply #25 |
30. Did Mark Felt participate in the Watergate break-in? I'm not that UP on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mandate My Ass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 10:09 AM Response to Reply #25 |
31. Not if the leak resulted in uncovering corruption |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 10:23 AM Response to Reply #31 |
34. "public welfare" is a slippery term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mandate My Ass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 10:27 AM Response to Reply #34 |
35. If the public welfare was served...we'd hear about it 24/7 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Festivito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 11:59 AM Response to Reply #25 |
48. What law did Feld break? nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 12:16 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. I think (not 100% positive) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 02:28 PM Response to Reply #52 |
66. What makes you think we have a "free press"? Operation Mockingbird,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 02:23 PM Response to Reply #25 |
64. "Deep Throat" was a whistle-blower who revealed the inner workings .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 02:38 PM Response to Reply #64 |
69. Of course there is a difference morally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 03:03 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. What SCOTUS upheld was that anyone that leaks the name of.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 03:40 PM Response to Reply #69 |
74. 1) The 'source' was a Bush Admin crony acting FOR the Bush Admin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Me. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
21. This Is Not A Whistle Blower Case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darkhawk32 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:54 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. See post #22. I think we're saying the same thing in essence. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Me. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 10:01 AM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Indeed We Are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darkhawk32 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 10:04 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Thank you. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Me. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 10:42 AM Response to Reply #29 |
40. The Only Thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Geoff R. Casavant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
50. Can't say for sure . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darkhawk32 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 01:12 PM Response to Reply #50 |
58. Don't forget misconduct of another... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davsand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:45 AM Response to Reply #11 |
17. It opens the door to Fitzgerald and some indictments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rose Siding (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 10:01 AM Response to Reply #17 |
26. According to the LAT, indictments for exposing Plame are "unlikely" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 10:27 AM Response to Reply #26 |
37. "her identity was already known in Washington"? Sorry, but that sounds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 02:31 PM Response to Reply #37 |
67. You're sayin' correctly. Her identity as the head operative of a.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kohodog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 03:28 PM Response to Reply #37 |
72. That has been floating around for a while. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mandate My Ass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 10:32 AM Response to Reply #26 |
39. Gawd, not the LA Times too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LightningFlash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 07:40 PM Response to Reply #39 |
78. No kidding... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 02:20 PM Response to Reply #26 |
63. The LAT has routinely written articles supporting NeoCon decisions... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 10:48 AM Response to Reply #11 |
41. No, because JM was not protecting a whistleblower |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
satireV (497 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 02:12 PM Response to Reply #11 |
61. No it is not a bad ruling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 02:18 PM Response to Reply #11 |
62. It's a crime to knowingly reveal the name of an intelligence operative.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robertpaulsen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 02:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
68. NO! SCOTUS already ruled on this in 1972! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robertpaulsen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-28-05 12:57 PM Response to Reply #68 |
84. Kick for Tuesday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
12. Ruling was "without any comment or recorded dissent." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
14. Supreme Court Won't Hear CIA Leak Case (Miller, Cooper appeal rejected) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moobu2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
23. This case is different due to the national security issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
28. I wouldn't get my hopes up re. the Plame case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Night Owl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 10:11 AM Response to Reply #28 |
32. I still don't know what to make of Fitzgerald... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 11:23 AM Response to Reply #32 |
43. Fitzgerald stalling, can't just dismiss it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevsand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 11:54 AM Response to Reply #43 |
45. He's not stalling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 12:16 PM Response to Reply #45 |
53. Stalling in the eye of the beholder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 12:23 PM Response to Reply #45 |
56. What about post #49? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevsand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:30 PM Response to Reply #56 |
82. I suspect that the posters who responded later in that sub-thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 03:52 PM Response to Reply #28 |
75. He's been held up by all the appeals by Cooper and Miller |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
33. Judith Miller deserves to rot in jail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
36. Go to Jail, Judy, Go Directly to Jail.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LyleNews (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
38. The Best Judges Money Can Buy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chan790 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 11:11 AM Response to Reply #38 |
42. I can assure you the WH wanted SCOTUS to rule for Miller and Cooper. N/M |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 11:24 AM Response to Reply #42 |
44. That is the clue! Is the WH and is NOVAK happy /unhappy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chan790 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 12:15 PM Response to Reply #44 |
51. I think the WH won't tip its hand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 11:59 AM Response to Reply #42 |
46. Hi Chan790 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
49. from another article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chan790 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 12:22 PM Response to Reply #49 |
55. But what did he say? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Me. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 01:26 PM Response to Reply #55 |
59. It Has Been Hinted At |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 08:01 PM Response to Reply #59 |
79. Obstruction of Justice or Proof Person Knew What they were doing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Me. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 09:26 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. Proving Intent Would Be Great |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 03:10 PM Response to Reply #55 |
71. Novak definitely would have told the truth to keep his worn-out.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warrens (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
54. Teddy Olson is Cooper's attorney? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
medeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 12:43 PM Response to Reply #54 |
57. best news of all... he lost .. Poor Ted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
65. Gee what a surprise...not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robertpaulsen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
76. Kicking with the hope of a FROGMARCH! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LightningFlash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
77. Game over, Robert Novak.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostnfound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-28-05 08:03 AM Response to Reply #77 |
83. Novak hasn't been prosecuted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:24 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC