Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Panel weighs giving troops option of cash instead of benefits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 12:35 AM
Original message
Panel weighs giving troops option of cash instead of benefits
Edited on Thu Jul-21-05 12:53 AM by lebkuchen
Should the Defense Department take the money it spends on benefits and offer it as cash for servicemembers to spend as they see fit?

That is one of the questions the Defense Department’s advisory committee on military compensation tackled during its third public meeting Wednesday.

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld chartered the committee in early spring, directing its members to come up with recommendations for improving the Pentagon’s military compensation system in a report due in April 2006.

The compensation committee spent its Wednesday meeting discussing options on five specific categories: special and incentive pays; retirement pay, including pensions and medical benefits; Guard and Reserve compensation; medical benefits for serving forces; and family issues, such as housing and spouse employment opportunities.


http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=30480

The childcare benefits the military supplies troops' families with now is paltry. There is a long waiting list to even receive that care. Try cash, Rummy. Your army is filled with people who joined at 18 just to escape a miserable family life. They would like nothing better than to make the army their family, though not under conditions that are worse than what they left back home, which is exactly what Rummy has managed to accomplish in four years.

What they want is a fast CAR. Try offering that as an incentive and see what happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. This just seems like another way of privatizing everything

and taking away a defined benefit plan. Not to mention:

1. Taking some of the value back through taxes

2. Exposing the troops to inflation of costs and resulting reduction of the benefit.

3. Exposure to geographical differences in costs.

I also think that younger troops or those less mature may be likely to misspend a cashout of benefits.

Why not just properly fund and manage the benefits ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I know somebody who was talked into reenlisting while in Iraq
Edited on Thu Jul-21-05 01:06 AM by lebkuchen
because of a cash bonus. He spent it all on a car. I'm not saying the money was well spent. I'm saying, for young guys like him, it's a big enough carrot to dangle, just to keep distance from the homefront, in spite of the warfront. The army is in poor shape recruitment-wise. I think the article is another indication of having to grasp at straws before implementing a draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. What a stupid, STUPID idea!
Here guys, here's some nice shiny money! Or...you can have some boring old health care. Just remember how poor you are and choose wisely! I cannot believe this incompetent, bloodthirsty bastard hasn't been run out of government forever for his mendacity coupled with incompetence and such stunning arrogance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. The new recruits are poor, and now Rummy is trying to appeal
to their greatest need, because Rummy's greatest need right now is bodies to fill boots to fight his war so Rummy et al can become richer. That may mean "enriching" the pockets of the boys/girls in boots for the time being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. Halliburton and the other defense contractors want it all
Let's screw the GIs out of their benefits. Want some beads for your lifetime medical benefits, GI?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patty Diana Donating Member (555 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. These whores are attempting to shield themselves from a FLOOD
of Depleted Uranium suits, they know are on the way. Just look what they did with Gulf War I vets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC