Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Your IQ's gone up - now we can execute you

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:00 PM
Original message
Your IQ's gone up - now we can execute you
A CONVICTED murderer spared from Death Row because he was judged to be mentally retarded could now face execution after his IQ was found to have risen by at least 15 points.

Daryl Atkins, 27, who had an IQ of 59 in 1998, scored a historic victory in the United States Supreme Court three years ago when judges ruled that executing mentally retarded criminals was unconstitutional.

snip

Now, however, he could face death by lethal injection after he recorded a higher test score of at least 74, placing him just above Virginia's threshold of 70.

Dr Evan Nelson, who tested Atkins in 1998 and 2004, wrote in a report last year that "his constant contact with the many lawyers that worked on his case" gave him more intellectual stimulation in jail than he got during childhood.

who are we? I don't think human after this article
http://news.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=1682232005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. We are "the good guys".... haven't you heard??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh my GOD.
So, having repeated contect with lawyers and other educational material and situations may make you smart enough to be put to death if you are 'retarded' in the first place.

Please allow me to officially go on record as being opposed to any form of death penalty being imposed within US borders.

This shit is sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dr Nelson, if he were ethical, would say that the premorbid intelligence
or the intelligence at the time of the crime is what is important. Yeah, he may now, on paper, understand why he "must" die, but that doesn't mean that when he had an IQ of 59 he understood the full implications of actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave502d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Did he murderer someone with his knew IQ?
Could he say let me out now,You see with my knew IQ i know it wrong to murder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think I've heard everything now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. So now he can appreciate the irony of his execution? What a joke
this legal system is! Seems to me that this is analogous to executing a recovered and now sane individual who had committed a crime while insane.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. based on that, execute Hinckley
I know he didn't kill Raygun, but attempted assasination should have some severe penalties. Especially since he is bush the meaner's relative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. WTF? "His legal campaign spared dozens of prisoners from Death Row"
So, can they all be periodically tested and if they score high enough go back to Death Row? This is nuts!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heddi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Isn't the point SUPPOSED to be that at the time of his crime
his IQ was low, therefore making him mentally retarded at the time, which is why his execution was deemed unconstitutional.

So his IQ went up in jail---so what? He was, AT THE TIME OF THE CRIME (which is what he is on death row for), MENTALLY RETARDED.

That's like someone murdering someone and going to jail for 10 years because they never went to jail before (no prior record). However, upon entering the jail, their sentence is automatically increased to life in prison because hey! they're a prisoner now, and therefore have a record. Of course it doesn't make any more sense than this case.

This is just disgusting, and fully underlines one of the NUMEROUS reasons why I oppose the death penalty in all cases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. In fairness they do have a quite different argument than some here
are positing them to have.

But prosecutors claim Atkins had covered up his intelligence at the earlier test and was mentally competent to face the death penalty.

snip

Prosecutors, however, say that if Atkins was competent enough to use a firearm and then concoct a story during a police interview, during which he attempted to cover up his crime, his mental capacity is at a level that makes him culpable. His crime required planning and forethought, they say.

They also point out that Atkins has previously boasted of being a fan of television gameshows Jeopardy and Wheel of Fortune and claimed to solve the puzzles "before anyone else can".

"I know people who are truly mentally retarded, and Daryl Atkins is not one of them," prosecutor Eileen Addison said in 2003.

end of quote

I am not saying that it is right to execute him, I am against the DP in all circumstances, nor am I saying they are right that he dogged the first test, but it is wholly dishonest to claim they acknowledge that his IQ got better so he should be executed. They are claiming his IQ was always this high.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. IQ is generally understood to not be changeable by more than a few points
Look no farther than * after Harvard Business School if you want to see how much effect a stimulating and intellectual environment can have on IQ.

Besides, does anyone seriously believe repeated exposure to LAWYERS makes you bristle with intelligence?

Seriously, this is just one more of the inanities that result from having to codify the practice of state killing into law.

The death penalty kills innocent people, retarded people, and people who would have gotten a different sentence from another judge or jury. So much for equal treatment under the law.

Of course we must punish or neutralize the criminals, but for God's sake not in a way that prevents us from correcting mistakes. Equally important, we must not abandon our own humanity to correct the lack of it in someone else.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. Death row inmate's intelligence at center of jury trial
Death row inmate's intelligence at center of jury trial

By Sue Lindsey
ASSOCIATED PRESS

5:09 p.m. July 25, 2005

YORKTOWN, Va. – Prospective jurors were questioned Monday for a trial that will determine whether a man whose case led to the Supreme Court ban on executing the mentally retarded falls into that category himself.
(snip)

Atkins, 27, has been on death row since 1998 for the robbery and murder of an Air Force enlisted man.
(snip)

Atkins' lawyers bear the burden of proving that the slight, balding man is mentally retarded. If they do not do so, the judge told the potential jurors, another court has already determined that he will be executed.
(snip)

Atkins, who did not finish high school, scored 59 on an IQ test in 1998, but had scores as high as 74 and 76 on more recent tests. Virginia law also requires that mental retardation be determined by age 18, but Atkins was not tested as a youth.
(snip/...)

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20050725-1709-deathrow-retarded.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. Well of course he has to be executed
Edited on Mon Jul-25-05 10:38 PM by DS1
A man who only possesses any IQ points above 60 that stem from the direct interaction with lawyers is nothing but a shark with legs.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bassman79 Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. I ain't cryin for him
if he murdered innocent people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. bassman, I hope you never fu*k up
because with an attitude like that, there will be no mercy for you.
Good luck in the forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
15. This is almost as bad as forcing medication to enable execution
stupid country/stupid court
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silvershadow Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
16. i don't get it ...presumeably
his IQ was below the threshold at the time of the crime, correct?
So they are going to execute him because he used to be mentally retarded but now he isnt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. yeppers, that's the rationale
It sure doesn't make sense to me either. It's like saying if you are underage when you commit a crime, but are tried some time later, you should be tried as an adult. But hey, this is the new world order and everything you knew is turned upside down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhinojosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
19. Bush is mentally retarded with a low IQ and is a murderer....
where is his lethal injection?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC