Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Murdoch dynasty 'will end' (we can only hope!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Ernesto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 04:24 PM
Original message
Murdoch dynasty 'will end' (we can only hope!)


Empire likely to be broken up after founder's death, says former lieutenant

Monday August 1, 2005
The Guardian

Rupert Murdoch's News Corp media empire is unlikely to survive intact beyond its founder's lifetime and will be broken up, according to a former Murdoch lieutenant.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,3604,1539998,00.html?gusrc=rss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
politicaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. I personally think that he's already dead...
and the company is being run by his megaevil undead corpse that wanders the halls of Fox looking for democrats to feed on to retain its unholy life-in-death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geomon666 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Just like Dick Cheney
zing! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mconvente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. no surprise to me
Edited on Mon Aug-01-05 05:27 PM by mconvente
NY Post lost $30 million last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11cents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rupert Murdoch = Mr. Burns
He keeps his blood in ice cube trays and his inner organs in little baggies. In case he ever needs them, though he never has. Die? I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Peanut Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. You gotta hand it to him, though...
Edited on Mon Aug-01-05 06:49 PM by Mr. Peanut
"The Simpsons" is about the most creative TV series, IMHO. "Seinfeld" to me is not even a close second. Both shows started ca. 1989-1990 (Simpsons first appeared in 1987 as a series of 30-second spots produced for the Emmy Award-winning variety series "The Tracey Ullman Show"). However, while Seinfeld ended in 1998, Simpsons is set to run to 2008. I like to imagine Seinfeld's characters as Simpson characters. For example, Seinfeld is Bart. Kramer is Krusty. Elaine is Mrs. Krabappel. George is Milhouse. Newman is Nelson. Your comparisons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Ozymandias.
by Percy Bysshe Shelley

I met a traveler from an antique land
Who said: Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert. Near them, on the sand,
Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown,
And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
The hand that mocked them, and the heart that fed;
And on the pedestal these words appear:
“My name is Ozymandias, king of kings:
Look upon my works, ye Mighty, and despair!”
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Who was the guy who posted here
telling us about the upcoming demise of Fox? He used to work there and left. I'd like to see the link if anyone has it. It was an awesome post.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. It proves the old wisdom - that the first generation builds the empire,
the second consolidates it, and the third loses it.

The reasoning is that the first generation builds from nothing
(Rupert's father), the second consolidates it - they remember the
early years of struggle and want to prove themselves, but the third
generation is raised in privilege and has no hunger and no need to
prove themselves, and the impetus to build is lost.

We in Australia can only hope that Jamie Packer also loses his
father's empire - he too seems to lack the killer instinct. Given
the way these two families have subverted the political process for
their own ends, we can only hope this is how it pans out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC