Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Peace Corps Option for Military Recruits Sparks Concerns

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:09 PM
Original message
WP: Peace Corps Option for Military Recruits Sparks Concerns
Peace Corps Option for Military Recruits Sparks Concerns

By Alan Cooperman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, August 2, 2005; Page A11

The U.S. military, struggling to fill its voluntary ranks, is offering to allow recruits to meet part of their military obligations by serving in the Peace Corps, which has resisted any ties to the Defense Department or U.S. intelligence agencies since its founding in 1961.

The recruitment program has sparked debate and rising opposition among current and former Peace Corps officials. Some welcome it as a way to expand the cadre of idealistic volunteers created by President John F. Kennedy. But many say it could lead to suspicions abroad that the Peace Corps, which has 7,733 workers in 73 countries, is working together with the U.S. armed forces.

"Does this raise red flags for the Peace Corps community? I'd say yes -- emphatically so," said Kevin Quigley, president of the National Peace Corps Association, an organization of returned volunteers, staff and supporters. "We think a real or perceived linkage between the Peace Corps and military service could damage the Peace Corps and potentially put the safety of Peace Corps volunteers at risk."

Congress authorized the recruitment program three years ago in legislation that drew little attention at the time but is stirring controversy now, for two reasons: The military has begun to promote it, and the day is drawing closer when the first batch of about 4,300 recruits will be eligible to apply to the Peace Corps, after having spent 3 1/2 years in the armed forces. That could happen as early as 2007.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/01/AR2005080101310.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. awful
One more way for recruiters to mislead kids.

(fine print: if there's a crisis we can call you back to the military.)


And the eventual obvious path will be that the peace corps is pulled into supporting roles in military actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. ?????
No f'ing way.

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. plus. oh you signed up for the corp (the peace corp) so now we got you
whenever and wherever we want to put you.
just like the reserves, just like the national guard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Jezuz! Talk about embedding!
Combat trained Peace Corps members to be activated at will by the maladministration!
Are they suppose to train children and parents in how to make IEDs to fight who the U$ doesn't like?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bspence Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
34. I don't think so
My brother was in the Peace Corps and they'll never be able to call him into military service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ted Kennedy must be having a stroke....the bunch of thugs
now want to screw up the Peace Corps.

Everything they touch, the ruin. Of course, how many Democrats voted for this crap without reading whatever bill it was buried in???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Nothing good in our name will be left.
This sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is not a good idea.
How stupid do they think the people are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. are Peace Corps Volunteers going to get real money after they serve???
Edited on Mon Aug-01-05 09:42 PM by YOY
and assistance to finding federal employment?

I got 2K and a few job leads/scholarship opps.

No offense to veterans, but PCVs serve too and there are no ticker tape parades for PCVs. No one calls us patriots. PCVs get raped, physically assaulted, and there have been some very negative episodes among our little group.

I can just imagine PCV group divvying themselves up between the military and the regular volunteers. I can imagine being looked down upon by the military volunteers.

and an US RPCV I SAY F*** THIS WITH A F***ING CHAINSAW!!

Are there any more RPCVs here. I CANNOT STAND THE IDEA OF THIS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phusion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. I have just been nominated to serve in the PC
This really blows...I thought the PC was supposed to CLEARLY be seperate from all other government orgs or activities.

Argh...Can you say second thoughts?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Enjoy your service.
I as well as many other RPCVs would very much like to know how the service is changed.

Granted you have no knowledge of how it was prior and I suppose you won't see any changes take place until the end of your service though.

Welcome to the club. It used to be far more exclusive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. don't you have to have a college degree
to serve in the peace corps?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phusion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Not a necessity...
But to be competitive you have to have either that or extensive work experience. I think about 90% of volunteers have an undergrad degree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. the stupidity of it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. McCain and Bayh - and the Peace Corp knew nothing about it until
it was passed. How can we put an end to this BS of rolling pet projects (that have no chance in hell on their own) into other bills?

Geez, there is soooo much about our gov't that should be changed. I doubt we'll ever get the chance. Between the neocons, corporatists and plutocracy, we the people don't stand a chance short of a revolution. And that would be hard to pull off since they've got "the people" at each others throats in a culture war and fighting over wedge issues.

snip>

Two longtime proponents of national service programs, Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Evan Bayh (D-Ind.), devised the legislation "to provide Americans with more opportunities to serve their country," said Bayh's spokeswoman, Meghan Keck. When it stalled as a separate bill, aides to the senators said, they folded it into a 306-page defense budget bill, where it did not attract opposition.

Peace Corps Director Gaddi H. Vasquez, who was appointed in 2002 by President Bush, said in a recent interview that the Peace Corps was unaware of the provision until after it became law.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. This will make any Peace Corps volunteer a target for
anyone who is opposed to U.S. military ventures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. and allow
Edited on Mon Aug-01-05 09:58 PM by YOY
certain people in who may not have "Peace Corps Interests" at heart.

Your site mate could be gathering intelligence!

This is the first time I've been mad enough to hurt someone. I do not like it.

this and WHAT SKILLS DO AN ENLISTED MAN BRING? We (PCVs) have functions (agricultural, TEFL, business consultants, ecologists).


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
22. I believe that is the intent of this slimy piece of work

~snip~

"In his 2002 State of the Union address, Bush called for doubling the size of the Peace Corps, from 7,000 to 14,000 volunteers, within five years.

~snip~

"The president has been very supportive of the Peace Corps and has requested budget increases each fiscal year that would allow for this"

~snip~


The neo-whores are calculated at every move that they make. They do NOTHING for the good of humanity----they ONLY act to advance their agenda.

As for McCain & Blah, they are not innocent in this endeavor. They chose to dance with the devil they knew, and they know as well as we the neo-con's agenda. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. and I remember hoping...
That this constituted a better budget. More marketing for additional volunteers.

Nope...just FASCIST SPIN. Putting the military where it doesn't belong. Just what we freaking need: a bunch of 19 year old testosterone induced kids who have been de- and reprogrammed...

I can easily imagine a group of military PCVS with strange clandestine overtures, retribution upon anti-American locals, harassment of the gay volunteers....the nightmare just goes on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. I remember thinking the same thing myself
When it all began in 2000, I knew bush was horrible for the nation, but I had no idea of the depth of the evil of the bush cabal or the neo-con agenda. I did not have a computer so I got the "news" from the MSM.

Since coming to DU last Nov, I have spent *many* hours reading mounds of info compiled by our many wonderful researchers. Wow, what an eye opener. Also since being here I have been able to watch in real time the neo-cons lie and manipulate the press and the message as they pursue their slimy agenda.

Never again. If something is put out by the neo-cons, no matter how benign it appears on the surface, I now know that only a small amount of digging will reveal the lurking evil intent. I only wish the Dems in DC would treat the neo-cons with the same open eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. I just recalled!


Here's another snip for you:

Ann Coulter's little comment on the Today Show at the end of her little confrontation with Katie Couric (I think it was Katie).

Something about making the Peace Corps more effective.

Like sacred words coming out of the mouth of a devil that one...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. Orwell - War is Peace
Bush - Peace Corps are War Corps.

This sounds like a sucker ploy anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Daleo your on it =Democracy = Fascism
Bring Peace to the world = Bring War

I've been watching the vocabulary of Cheney and the others and its total corruption of our language... Yes Orwell had it!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
38. yep, more ways for bushco** to spread more wars
oops, I mean democracy. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. Army battling steep decline in black recruits
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/world/stories/080205dnintblackrecruits.d405a2c.html

The Iraq war is drying up at least part of a pool of recruits the Army has relied upon for decades: black Americans. The Army has long enjoyed a special relationship with black Americans, who have filled its ranks at rates far beyond their share of the population since the draft was abolished in 1973.


"A lot of black kids, they don't want to be in it," said DeTorrian Rhone, 18, a 2005 graduate of Bryan Adams High School in East Dallas. He talked to Army recruiters but decided to go to Texas Southern University instead.

"Most of the kids say they don't want to fight for a country that's pickin' on other countries," he said. "I don't want to fight because this war was stupid, it wasted money. Army people are getting killed for nothing, and we should have stayed in our own business."


Ever since the Army became an all-volunteer force in the 1970s, it has relied on blacks for roughly a quarter of its soldiers, though they constituted less than 15 percent of the population. And for historical and economic reasons, they have answered the call.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
18. So join Brethren Volunteer Service
Totally separate from the government, and the Church of the Brethren is working now with Selective Service to certify BVS as alternative service for {ahem} draftees. Not that there's a draft imminent or anything, so stop saying that.

Anyway, the info about BVS is here:

http://www.brethrenvolunteerservice.org/

And it isn't just limited to draft age folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. thanks but if I wanted to be a missionary
I would have done so in my own religion. (No faith based insults intended)

There is no religious involvement in the PC.

and NORTHERN IRELAND!!! How one must suffer there! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. You aren't asked to be a missionary in BVS
Perhaps you should read the web site. There is no evangelism in BVS, no "mission" work beyond being of service in the assignment (from the website):

Brethren Volunteer Service is persons giving their time and skills to help a world in need. It is a way for people to work at issues greater than themselves, recognizing that their efforts may not immediately solve deep-rooted problems, but can be part of on-going work for justice, peace, and the integrity of creation.

Sharing God's love through acts of service

Volunteers bring hope to shattered lives, offer food and shelter to those in need, and build understanding between individuals, groups, nations, humanity, and the world we share.

BVS seeks persons willing to act on their commitment and values. We challenge individuals to offer themselves, their time, and their talents to work that is both difficult and demanding, rewarding and joyful.

Volunteers receive room, board, medical insurance, transportation to project and a monthly allowance of $60-$80. Volunteers may live in a group situation, an apartment, or with a family. (In most cases, educational loans may be deferred.)

It is essential that each volunteer bring a willingness to serve. Important work towards peace, justice, meeting the needs of humanity and the environment calls out for persons willing to serve.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. I did...and you are "technically" right but
there is religious motivation behind it. Even if it has that motivation it can be seen as a missionary effort in some developing countries.

If there is such an issue in the PC it is personal and not brought to the forefront.

I'm sure it is noble...but it is not a substitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
despairing optimist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
21. War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Truth.
We're getting there, and we're only 20 years off schedule. Apologies to Orwell until he gets vaporized too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
23.  Wonderful... all Peace Corps volunteers will now be targets...
... since combatants will view them as potential military personnel. Just freaking ignorant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bspence Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. They were already doing that
My bro was in the PC and his phone was tapped, he was watched all the time, strangers would come up to him asking him what he was doing and where he was going...

Countries already think they're CIA agents, now they're thinking that PCVs are outright military.

Horrible news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cire4 Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
24. I sure as hell hope they let them do Peace Corps service FIRST
I question whether or not these soldiers would be mentally fit to serve in the Peace Corps after serving in a war-like environment. The last thing we need is Peace Corps officers going into the towns and villages with a war-conditioned mindset (i.e. suspicious, hesitant, and potentially violent).

It would be much better to let them do Peace Corps service first so they can develop a sympathetic connection to the unfortunate people of foreign countries. Maybe then, when they enter into war, they won't be torturing or needlessly killing these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. Nope, heres how it works.
Edited on Wed Aug-03-05 04:00 PM by K-W
They go through basic training, serve actively for I think 18 months, then go into the Individual Ready Reserve for a couple of years, then they have the option of serving the rest of thier time in the peace corp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
27. Seems they'll do anything to avoid an actual draft until they are
left with no choice at all. Peace corp/military service. :crazy: They want to ruin everything decent and good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. "The words 'civil-military operations' are now in the Army lexicon,"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
36. War and Peace Corps: Are Pentagon Ties Endangering Volunteers?
War and Peace Corps: Are Pentagon Ties Endangering Volunteers?

Peace Corps volunteers are raising alarm bells about legislation that allows the U.S. military to recruit young people by holding out the option of a two-year stint in the Peace Corps to fulfill service obligations. We speak with the National Peace Corps Association, a Washington Post reporter, the U.S. Army Recruiting Command, and a Peace Corps parent.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As the U.S. military scrambles to meet recruiting goals, controversy is emerging over a new initiative that allows members of the armed forces to join the Peace Corps to fulfill part of their eight year service obligation. On Tuesday, the Washington Post published an article on the Peace Corps option for military recruits. The partnership was established through legislation backed by Senators John McCain and Evan Bayh and passed two years ago by Congress. It's only now, though, that the miliatry is heavily promoting the Peace Corps option to recruits through its National Call to Service program. And 2007 will see the first batch of recruits who will be eligible to participate in the Peace Corps after fulfilling a 15-month stint in the military. The program is part of the Individual Ready Reserve, which consists of active duty troops and trained military personnel who can be called up to active duty to fill vacancies.

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/08/03/1420205
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wind Dancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
37. Amy Goodman covers this story today.
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/08/03/1420205

War and Peace Corps: Are Pentagon Ties Endangering Volunteers?

Part of interview with Alan Cooperman:

-snip-

AMY GOODMAN: Can you just lay out what it is you learned, and specifically is it possible that the Peace Corps, the head of the Peace Corps, didn't even know that this option was in place until now?

ALAN COOPERMAN: Well, what I learned was that this program has really been in effect for more than two years. The legislation was actually passed in 2002. But very few people in the Peace Corps seem to know anything about it. I contacted Peace Corps -- current Peace Corps workers around the world. Virtually none of them had heard of it. I contacted a lot of Peace Corps former officials, well-known folks around the country, some of the founders of the Peace Corps. They were unaware of the details of this program, and many had no idea that the program even existed. And the reason is because it's really only now going into effect. Nobody has yet entered the Peace Corps through this route. Now, in all fairness to the sponsors of the legislation, it's clear, I think, that they intended this both to be a tool for military recruiting and, I think, in their minds, to be something good for the Peace Corps. I think that the idea was national service of all varieties, whether it be serving in a New York City inner city school as a teacher through AmeriCorps or in an African village through the Peace Corps or in the military, that all of those are valid forms of national service that should be honored, and in some sense, honored equally. And I think that that was the underlying intent of this legislation, but you are quite right that once word about it began to filter through the Peace Corps, and now it has begun to move very rapidly through the Peace Corps, quite a bit of concern has built up and I think growing opposition, and I think there are going to be moves to try to change the program legislatively.

much more................

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC