Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Santorum) Leading Republican differs with Bush on evolution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:33 PM
Original message
(Santorum) Leading Republican differs with Bush on evolution
<<SNIP>>
http://wireservice.wired.com/wired/story.asp?section=Breaking&storyId=1071656&tw=wn_wire_story

Republican differs with Bush on evolution

PHILADELPHIA (Reuters) - A leading Republican senator allied with the religious right differed on Thursday with President Bush's support for teaching an alternative to the theory of evolution known as "intelligent design."

Republican Sen. Rick Santorum, a possible 2008 presidential contender who faces a tough re-election fight next year in Pennsylvania, said intelligent design, which is backed by many religious conservatives, lacked scientific credibility and should not be taught in science classes.

Bush told reporters from Texas on Monday that "both sides" in the debate over intelligent design and evolution should be taught in schools "so people can understand what the debate is about."

"I think I would probably tailor that a little more than what the president has suggested," Santorum, the third-ranking Republican member of the U.S. Senate, told National Public Radio. "I'm not comfortable with intelligent design being taught in the science classroom."

<</SNIP>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Santorum must be reading some TERRIFYING poll numbers n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. That's exactly what it is.
Edited on Thu Aug-04-05 02:39 PM by skypilot
The election is a ways off but Bob Casey Jr. is beating the shit out of Santorum in the polls. If the election were held today or tomorrow or next month Santorum would lose. He's trying to appear moderate and like less of the nutcase that we all know him to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Add me to that - palpable fear in a state where they don't control the
voting machines....YET.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antonialee839 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
39. Intelligent Design I sure hope so! This guy needs to be
kicked to the curb. Casey can beat this creep.

Working woman in Pa.................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who is this impostor, and where is the real Santorum?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. LOL!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. Why - He is perfectly consistent with himself. He is catholic,
not evangelical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. A couple reasons.
1) he's been a solid "toe-the-Bush-line" tool up til now, and this was a high profile break with the Bush line.

2) He also just reversed his position on stem cells, which is (I think) against the Catholic church's position, and also another break with the Bush party line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Santorum is for stem cells research? Since when?
Edited on Thu Aug-04-05 03:23 PM by Mass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #37
48. Can't find my ref. Maybe I confused this with Frist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marbuc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #48
61. You're thinking of Frist
but the Cons are jumping (the radical right) ship so fast it's hard to keep track.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Universal Acid Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #61
95. He's fading fast...
He know's he's in trouble next election.

Santorum's in his last throws.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geoff R. Casavant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #23
42. Also on the interview
He revealed that on his Blackberry he keeps a list of all the names he has been called. He says it's because of his faith alone, but whenever I have heard someone use the terms he mentioned, it's usually because of his insistence on using his faith to pummel the rest of us into acting like he wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. I found him frightening enough not knowing that.
This guy is crazy. I was just pointing that the ID remark was not necessarily a change on his position.

But the guy is crazy, no doubt about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #42
62. Here's a new name for his blackberry, fucking ass face jerk. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pseudostar Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #62
102. DAMN!
beat me to it.... :grr:

well, i still like mine better :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pseudostar Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #42
101. Hey Rick....
Add "cockbiting fucktard" to the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #101
105. That is a good one LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kbm8795 Donating Member (337 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #42
106. And one wonders where he keeps. . .
a listing of all the names he has called the rest of us? In a warehouse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
45. *GUFFAW*
:rofl: :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broken_Hero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
92. He is...
Hiding in a church, praying, that is where the real RS is, but in reality, he would rather go to a strip joint or a titty bar, everything that comes out of his mouth is pandering, and rallying his consituents, its his job, thats what all politicians do, dems/repugs, and thats what he is doing. I think he is trying to be more moderate to get a little more votes, but i don't think he will get squat, he will lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ouch! My jaw just hit the floor. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devinsgram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:37 PM
Original message
Wow, first Frist and Santorum
If we just let them go they'll do themselves in for us. Sit back and enjoy the show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
40. I'd like to think this is another
case of the right eating their own. But. I'm jaded and cynical and very suspicious.
I still think the right is intentionally splitting their stated viewpoints in order to keep their adherents under their big tent. Nobody knows exactly what is going on. So, the confusion works to their advantage. They're NOT against gay rights. Yes, they are. They're for stem cell research. No. They're not. They're for teaching intelligent design. Well, no, not really.
This kind of Chinese menu approach works wonders with the freepers. They're always happy because they get just the meal they ordered.
Only, of course, they don't. No one does. It's just happy talk to keep people satiated. Meanwhile, whatever gets done will be whatever the corporate taskmasters want. Like the energy bill. And CAFTA. And our disgraceful minimum wage and healthcare.
Frist and Santorum are just part of the marketing game for the next election.
It's meaningless.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #40
55. Even the zealots are edging away from a radioactively incompetent Prez
With increasingly wierd and bizarre behavior. The guy's closer to a crackup lately. They don't really like each other or have loyalty, but they are in it together for "the fun" of tearing down the country's remaining foundations of decency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
41. We complain a lot about Dems trying to be Repugs...
...and now it looks like the Repugs are trying to act more like Democrats.

Verrrrry interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #41
65. they just want to get re-elected
face it. The Republicans did a wonderful job of getting together and forming their message and taking it to middle America. It worked. They looked strong. They have ideas. (bad ideas...but ideas). They made the Democrats look scattered and whiney.
Now. They just want to hang on. They want to keep their power. The cohesive message is gone.
But it doesn't matter. As long as hate-radio demonizes the liberals and doesn't hold any conservatives accontable, many in middle America will keep swallowing whatever these guys serve up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formerrepuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. So...? Pol Pot probably accepted evolution, also. He's still a creep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. Are we to believe there IS a difference between RW fringe radicals?
I doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aion Donating Member (574 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 03:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
96. Someone is worried about his job
I think it is safer to believe that Santorum has seen some recent polling data, and is worried for his career.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. One is supposed to swing to the middle only after one has won his
Edited on Thu Aug-04-05 02:38 PM by VegasWolf
party's nomination. I don't believe this turd for a second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ovidsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. Santorum is consistent
In his inconsistencies. Maybe he should consult more with his openly gay communications director, Robert Traynham.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Every time I hear about this guy, I don't think anything bad about
Santorum. I am thinking why the hell would an openly gay man work for the troll? What kind of self loathing asshole would do that? Queers like that don't deserve to be part of MY community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kliljedahl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. I heard that this morning on my way to work
Damn near drove off the road. Thought I had accidentally switched stations.


Keith’s Barbeque Central
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. He must believe he's got his group's undiminished support.
He'd better get ready for a backlash. He's going to learn who's really in the driver's seat here; the radical right's not as easy to manipulate as he has assumed.



Either you're with them, or you're against them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wurzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
13. And the Repukes have to worry about the other PA Senator who may retire.
And would be replaced by a Democrat by Gov. Rendell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. Two words:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. Even a broken clock is right twice a day. (on of my favorite aphorisms)
and completely applicable here for whatever reason santorum said this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. You can't polish a turd.
One of my favorite sayings, which seems especially appropriate when discussing Santorum's lame attempts to moderate his image.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eauclaireliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
76. I always liked
"I'd slap you, but shit splatters."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
modrepub Donating Member (484 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
85. No but
you can try and put a veneer on it!

Boss's saying for saying for trying to put the best face on a bad idea from upper management
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. Not a broken clock. A stopped clock. A broken clock may never be right.
Santorum is done gone dang ol' broken, man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #27
70. doh :) yep it is a stopped clock
but the point holds. He's correct for once in his damned life. I could care less why he chooses this one time to be correct about something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
17. Thsi could be a sign that the religious right is not as strong
as it was with the GOP.

Or

The GOP is losing the center because of their support of the Theocratic right.

There's some reason the GOP is running away from the Theocrats. We need to know why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
30. Yes, first Frist and now Sanitarium, nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #30
46. Let's see if another prominent Repub breaks with bush over
another hot button issue. It could be bush is falling on his sword to give a boost to presidential hopefuls and congressmen who are in tight races.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marbuc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
58. I think the reason is fairly obvious
Theocrats are WAY out of the mainstream, and just plain scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #58
77. Are they no longer needed by the GOP?
Or has the polling data shown that they are losing more than they are gaining by sucking up to the Theocrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marbuc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #77
82. I think it is the latter.
Polls are showing public dissatisfaction with the current establishment, and pandering to the interests of the hard right is a big reason for this.

The Radical Right has applied the full court press, and forced legislators into questionable decisions that contradict mainstream interests (Schiavo, stem cell research, gay marriage, etc., instead of "Main Street" issues like the economy, the war, education, and health insurance). The Republicans rightfully fear a push back, and therefore some are moving distancing themselves from these extreme groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #82
87. Could a split in the party or a third party?
Do you think the Theocratic party could form their own party, crippling the GOP if the 2008 candidate is not to their liking?

I heard rumblings back in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marbuc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #87
88. Perhaps in the long run
but I think in the short term you'll see people jumping to the existing fringe parties, especially if someone like McCain or Guiliani wins the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #88
93. I think they have the numbers and organization to build
a viable third party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #87
109. Depends on how successful the Pat Robertson gang was in taking
over the GOP. It may be the old/true Republicans that bail. Roberts plan was to take over the party by 2000 - seems he's been pretty successful. Could go either way, but I do think there will be a split - hopefully very soon.

Google pat robertson republican party - pretty interesting stuff.

How Pat Robertson and the Virginia GOP Use Each Other
http://www.sullivan-county.com/news/pat_quotes/main.htm

Sen. Lautenberg blasts Robertson, calls on Frist to condemn remarks
http://rawstory.com/exclusives/lautenberg_judges_robertson_frist_503.htm

snip>

The almost constant assaults on our federal judges by the radical right of the Republican Party has now caused one of its most prominent spokesmen to claim judges, not terrorists, are the number one threat to this country. I hope you will join me in condemning such harmful and heated language and call on Reverend Robertson to publicly apologize to every family who has lost a loved one to terrorism. Your silence on this matter would send a resounding signal to the entire country that the radical right controls the leadership of the Republican Party.


McCain assails religious right on Pat Robertson's home turf
http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/02/28/campaign.wrap/

snip>

"I'm a Reagan Republican who will defeat Al Gore. Governor Bush is a Pat Robertson Republican who will lose to Al Gore," said McCain, who again stressed his GOP credentials on abortion, taxes and defense while continuing to preach his reform message.

Boy, was he off on that call


The Christian right and the Republican Party: the dirty secret of American politics
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2000/mar2000/elec-m06.shtml

The political crisis within the Republican Party has reached an extraordinary level of intensity with the speech given by Senator John McCain February 28 in Virginia Beach, Virginia. McCain's indictment of Texas Governor George W. Bush as a prisoner of right-wing bigots was more than a campaign broadside. He put his finger on the dirty secret of modern American politics—the pervasive influence of extreme-right, racist and fascistic elements in the Republican Party.

Traveling to the city which is the headquarters of the Christian Broadcasting Network and the other business and media ventures of Pat Robertson, McCain denounced Robertson and Reverend Jerry Falwell, founder of the Moral Majority, declaring that the two right-wing fundamentalist preachers were “agents of intolerance.” McCain labeled Bush a “Pat Robertson Republican” whose subservience to the ultra-right would alienate voters and produce a Republican defeat in November.

snip.

Barely 24 hours after issuing his denunciation McCain began to retreat, after he was attacked by erstwhile supporters such as Bauer and former Secretary of Education William Bennett. McCain apologized for a later comment to the press in which he sarcastically referred to Robertson and Falwell as “the forces of evil.”

snip>

...Nonetheless, his attack on the Christian right and the ferocious response from the Republican establishment reveal political fissures within the ruling elite which have far more significance than who wins the Republican presidential nomination.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felix Mala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. He's not a comfortable with ID; how about 'young earth' theory?
Does he think the dinosaurs existed concurrently with humans? That they're actually the remains of the Goliath and the other Philistines that were put together by Godless secular sinners to dishonor God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. No he is catholic, not evangelical.
Edited on Thu Aug-04-05 03:03 PM by Mass
He is perfectly consistent with himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
20. Santorum is catholic, not evangelical
John Paul II has endorsed evolution a few years ago. Just say this was God's plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatholicEdHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #20
71. Correct, he seems to publically toe the line 100% with the
Vatican hierarchy. Evolution IS compatable according to the Cathachism. Of course, one rogue Cardnial came out not long ago questioning evolution (I think he was from Austria). I am suprised that Santorum did not take that statement and run with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
83. Thanks for posting this.
I was going to post this, but you have.

Neanderthal Santorum has no problem, as a Catholic, with evolutioin as some evangelicals do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
22. He is running to the middle instead of to the right---scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shipwack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
56. Wasn't it Reagan that said...
... the way to win an election was to zig to the middle to appear moderate, than zag back to the right to reassure your base?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
24. yes, and he went on to say that when evolution
is taught, they should also teach about the "holes" and "problems" with evolution. Apparently not all weasels walk on four legs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebbieCDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
25. Of course he doesn't want ID taught
It's pure creationism or nothing for "one of the best minds of the 13th Century"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brooklyn Michael Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
26. Fuh...fuh... fuh....fuh.... fuh....

Fuh-LIP Fuh-LOP!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
despairing optimist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
28. NY Post headline: Witless Republican Found in Gutless Stand
It's lose/lose. Hosanna in the highest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiegranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
29. Saints Preserve Us
This is a twilight zone news story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
31. Remember that junior isnt running for shit
So he is acting as the far-right pole, doing all the pandering to the taliban while frist and santorum and the rest of the fascist cabal who are actually running for something in 2006 are all publicly marking a distance from the looney-tune taliban nonsense coming out of junior's mouth. They are, as usual, having their cake and eating it here.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
32. I am getting very confused by all this
Are they interchanging the terms Intelligent Design and Creationism just to muddy the waters?

What Santorum (personally think he's a idiot) said makes me very suspicious.

Let me explain. I was raised a Catholic and went to Catholic school. I WAS taught Evolution in Catholic School in Science Class. This was not that God created the world in 6 days, Adam and Eve were created from nothing, bla, bla, bla. We were learned about the big bang theory, the age of the earth, lower life forms evolving, Neanderthals, etc., etc. About the only religion brought into it all was that "God created Evolution and that once God decided to give man a soul, it didn't matter what animal form he used, it was now a human being, even if it still had more chromosomes of an ape."

I hope I have been able to explain this correctly. This is why Santorum saying this troubles me, because if you leave out the part about God's role in all this, all you are really left with is true Evolution as it is being taught now. Why would he say it is fake science? From all I have read, the Fundies believe in the literal intpretation of the Bible. The Catholic Church has never had any problem with Evolution. This is a major difference between them and the Fundies.

That is why I am worried that they are cloaking the term Intelligent Design, when they really mean Creationism: the LITERAL interpretation of the BIBLE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #32
43. It's intentional confusion
to cast their nets very wide.
They're catching everybody in their sticky webs. They really believe nothing but the power of money.
And they know the way to keep control -- and keep power -- and get their hands on the most money, is to spread all kinds of conflicting messages so people who aren't really paying attention will think they're being represented.
They're not.
These guys only represent themselves.
This is all marketing. It's intentional and coordinated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marbuc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #32
64. the Intelligent Design "theory" is designed
to cast doubt on evolution, nothing more. Literally, all it offers is the belief that cells/organisms are too complex to be created "randomly." It offers no basis for this assumption, or alternative theory. I don't kbow why the theocrats want it taught, there is really nothing to teach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #32
84. Tell me the difference, please.
I thought Intelligent Design was Creationism. Thanks in advance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marbuc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #84
91. The difference is Creationism is a creation story
while Intelligent Design is merely a criticism of evolution. IDers mischaracterize evolution as a series of random mutations, and they believe organisms are too complex and efficient for this to be true. They have their lengthy explanations I'm sure, but that is pretty much it. As I said previously, it's primary function is to cause doubt of evolution, possibly opening debate for alternative ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #91
94. Thanks.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
33. Sanitarium stills feels comfortable with the Hollow Earth Theory though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
34. Oh my God, Cuckoobananas is now officially crazier than Rick
"Man On Dog" Santorum!

Wow. I'm scared.

:scared:

The Plaid Adder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Now, that is an especially frightening thought!!
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. Is that one of the signs of the apocalypse?
I mean finally (in)San(e)torum shows he has SOME brains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
44. F! Him!

Signed a native of the Boston area.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
49. LIAR! LIAR! Read Ricky's history on the Un-science issue
From National Center for Science Education

http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/articles/ID-activists-guide-v1.pdf

In proposing the amendment, Senator Santorum cited a law review article coauthored by "intelligent design" proponent David K DeWolf, professor of law at Gonzaga University and Senior Fellow at the Discovery Institute's Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture. And the godfather of the "intelligent design" movement, Phillip Johnson, was quoted in the June 18 Washington Times as having "helped frame the language" of the amendment.

On June 13, 2001, the US Senate adopted a Sense of the Senate amendment to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act Authorization bill, S 1, then under consideration. Proposed by Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA), the amendment read:

It is the sense of the Senate that (1) good science education should prepare students to distinguish the data or testable theories of science from philosophical or religious claims that are made in the name of science; and (2) where biological evolution is taught, the curriculum should help students to understand why the subject generates so much continuing controversy, and should prepare the
students to be informed participants in public discussions regarding the subject.


The Santorum Language does not Appear in the Final Version of the Education Bill Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum, writing in the March 14, 2002 issue of the Washington Times, claimed that his language was a "provision" of the bill:

At the beginning of the year, President Bush signed into law the "No Child Left Behind" bill. The new law includes a science education provision where Congress states that "where topics are taught that may generate controversy (such as biological evolution), the curriculum should help students to understand the full
range of scientific views that exist." If the Education Board of Ohio does not include intelligent design in the new teaching standards, many students will be denied a first-rate science education.


***************************************************************

Hypocrite and liar all rolled into one wingnut package. Get out of PA.


:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #49
67. You left out sneaky 'shit out' of the package
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kbm8795 Donating Member (337 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #49
107. This sounds just like Ricky
And I do so love it whenever a wingnut assumes that something becomes "controversial" just because they've had a new cultural war wet dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrankieWVU Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
50. Catholic Schools
Edited on Thu Aug-04-05 03:40 PM by FrankieWVU
I am Catholic (lapsed) and although I went to public school, I have student taught in Catholic schools and know for a fact that they teach evolution and not even mention ID in class. Also even the Pope said evolution is true... I don't think there are any major religions that argue against evolution. It's these right wing wackos, otherwise known as Southern Baptists
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Im_Your_Huckleberry Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
51. a wolf in sheeps clothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
52. Mr. "pursuit of happiness" hurts America?
I suspect that Repukes are trying to stage a "we're a big tent after all" crapfestpalooza ahead of the 2006 election.

See, folks? There's room in the Repuke Party for all kinds of Kool Aid drinkers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
53. Some of these Repubs are only 90% crazy, Bush& Cheney-100% screwy
Frist w. stem cell thing shows he's only 90 fucked up, but the champeens of insanity are these two turds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
54. Moderating like a maniac: Santorum must be scared
Pennsylvania: getting bluer by the minute?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalish Donating Member (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
57. Well he is Catholic
The Catholic church has made a relative peace with Darwin and evolution. This is in stark contrast to fundies of the James Dobson stripe.

And then of course, Santorum has a tough election fight ahead of him, he no doubt wants to appear moderate on some issues.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #57
73. Santorum thinks Pennsylvanians were born yesterday
and they're not onto his phony centrist crap. SORRY, RICKY! We know you're insane--and we weren't born yesterday!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
59. Dance, puppets, dance!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gelliebeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
60. hmmm.......
me thinks the word "polls" entered into the fray.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
63. Whaaaaat the fuuuu...
I must be living in bizzaro world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #63
66. He's lying...see post #49 for the TRUE Ricky
He's just pretending to be reasonable since his wingnut ways have led to piss-poor poll numbers here in PA for the 06 election.

It's a moderate veneer on a wingnut body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
68. triangulation
Edited on Thu Aug-04-05 04:37 PM by SlavesandBulldozers
one republican takes this position, one takes that postition. perhaps they even switch positions at some point, what does it really matter they're just positions. it gives the right the illusion of debate - and a mirage of depth and complexity. hell, it makes both look more steadfast in a debate of their own making. perfectly framed. in the end, everybody gets their tax cut.

ya didn't think it was about God or Science did you, only blue-collar republicans believe that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
69. Santorum's cup runneth over
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
72. Ooooo......this is a big issue Santorum (sarc), try threIraq war next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuaneBidoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
74. Both sides? What does that mean exactly? Science vs. myth? Is that what
both sides means? I don't understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raiden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
75. He DISAGREED with Bush???
WTF is up?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
78. These Repukes are supposed to be in control. They act like Keystone
Cops!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
79. monkeyboy v. monkeyboy, both directly descended from monkeys
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
80. Rick Santorum is an asshole
who actually doesn't know the difference between his own asshole and his mouth. All he's doing is spewing shit from both holes for a very long time. I really, really hope that someone is taking all of the many things he has been saying and is compiling them into one giant "anti-Santorum" campaign if the asshole DOES decide to run for president.

Hey--great idea for the fucking radical right: Run Santorum with Alan Keyes--they'd be a GREAT match together!!!! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 05:12 AM
Response to Reply #80
99. That will never happen
The repugs will never run a minority candidate, this is a male WASP country in their mind and it would kill the "southern strategy" if they did it. But they would gladly run somebody like Bull Connor and his fire hoses. You remember that inclusive guy that hung out with Negroes in the south during those turbulent times. They will embrace Strom Thurman and say he was very supportive of minorities, he had babies with them as proof. Strom Thurman loved Negroes so much he thought everybody should have one. They will never truly get behind a minority candidate, but they will support Strom and Bull and call it an all inclusive party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
81. Yeah, well bush can't help it..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
86. Apparently Santorum paid attention in Catholic school

and learned about evolution and natural selection.

Bush wasn't homeschooled by creationists, either, so he should know better, but perhaps he wasn't paying attention in science class. Or English class. Definitely not speech class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
89. He pretends to be sane election time
I predicted this, that Santorum was going to miraculously lean leftwards as elections loomed in his future. He knows he cannot be elected unless he can temporarily hide the fact that he's crazier than a shithouse rat. He discovers all sorts of reasonable things to say around election time. He's managed to fool stupid people in Pennsylvania twice now through this tactic, so why not this time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
90. A PROVEN FLIP FLOP!
Edited on Thu Aug-04-05 10:34 PM by deadparrot
Read it and weep, bitch.

"Therefore, intelligent design is a legitimate scientific theory that should be taught in science classes."

http://www.arn.org/docs/ohio/washtimes_santorum031402.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Count Popeula Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 04:54 AM
Response to Reply #90
98. Thank you for that.
It was good fodder to base a letter to the editor of my local (PA) newspaper on. Contrasting the two statements, they're nearly exactly the same, only on the exact opposite side of the issue.

And only 2 years apart. Hell, Bush called Kerry a flip-flopper for statements that were 25 years apart about abortion. Could anything other than public opinion have motivated Santorum's flip-floppery?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melnjones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 04:12 AM
Response to Original message
97. But the funniest part is this...
---Bush's science adviser, John Marburger, was quoted in The New York Times this week as saying intelligent design was not a scientific concept, and that Bush's remarks should be interpreted to mean he thinks the concept should be taught as part of the "social context" in science classes.---

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050804/pl_nm/politics_evolution_dc

Bush's remarks should be interpreted to mean...hee hee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 05:16 AM
Response to Original message
100. *taps on the glass* excuse me people! ahem! what does bush know about
"intelligent" anything???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_TN_TITANS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
103. Oh... this is rich
Can you say "flip-flopper" backlash on the Repubs? You better believe we won't let Frist forget about his mega flop on stem cells here in TN.

As if we wouldn't notice these assholes doing complete 180's with elections around the corner :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freedomfries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
104. KICK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalcanuck Donating Member (339 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
108. Methinks this asshole is trying to differentiate himself somewhat
from * like Frist did with the stem cell research. 2008 has some real repuke winners vying for nomination.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
110. FLIP-FLOPPER!!
everyone knows he's a bible thumping right wing fanatic. who's he trying to fool?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
111. Anybody else find it humorously ironic
that two simians are debating evolution? Me, I think it's damned funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
112. Santorum is another Radical Repuke Idiot.
Oh God, please don't tell me that this asshole is going to run for President in 2008.:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC