Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EPA Proposing Radiation Exposure Limits (Yucca Mountain)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 07:32 PM
Original message
EPA Proposing Radiation Exposure Limits (Yucca Mountain)
Tuesday August 9, 2005 11:01 PM


By H. JOSEF HEBERT

Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - Conceding there's no way to know what life will be like in a million years, the Environmental Protection Agency nevertheless proposed limits Tuesday on how much radiation a person should be exposed to from a nuclear waste dump in that distant time.

The proposal would limit exposure near the proposed Yucca Mountain facility in Nevada to 15 millirems a year for 10,000 years into the future, but then increase the allowable level to 350 millirems for up to 1 million years.

That higher level is more than three times what is allowed from nuclear facilities today by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

A standard chest X-ray is about 10 millirems. <snip>

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-5200842,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mr. Peanut Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. No surprise...
the inmates are running the prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. This would be an improvement over the 10K year standard (or less)
that the industry has pushed for the last decade ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Peanut Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Under Bush...
industry now "writes" the regulations of the EPA and other agencies. So, where's the catch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. This is lawsuit driven:
"A year ago a federal court said the EPA standard ... was inadequate because it didn't establish exposure limits beyond 10,000 years." http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-5200842,00.html

Of course the flying monkeys weren't pushing for this one ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. No surprise to Nevada residents. If you can't meet YOUR OWN STANDARDS,
then change the rules/standards and - viola! - you now meet the "standards".

Or just blatently lie - which is also what they've done.

Typical repuke bullshit. More "faith based" "science".

How I wish a Democrat were in control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC