Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conflicting accounts from top on Katrina response

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 03:40 PM
Original message
Conflicting accounts from top on Katrina response

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N14505805.htm

Conflicting accounts from top on Katrina response


WASHINGTON, Sept 15 (Reuters) - Under fire over the federal response to Hurricane Katrina, the White House and Homeland Security Department have offered conflicting accounts of who was in charge and when the administration first triggered what it promised would be a massive, organized federal response.

U.S. Senate investigators are looking closely at these inconsistencies and what some critics say was general confusion within the administration about what a newly created National Response Plan entailed.

....

In the same memo, Chertoff declared Katrina the first-ever "incident of national significance" -- an announcement touted the next day by the White House as key to setting in motion a carefully choreographed response and recovery effort.

But according to government documents, congressional aides and Homeland Security officials, what first triggered the "incident of national significance" was not Chertoff's memo, but a little-noticed statement issued by the White House on the night of Aug. 27 while President George W. Bush was still vacationing at his Crawford, Texas ranch.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. in the end there was nothing by news conferences and talking heads tell-
ing us all the things they were doing!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Conflicting accounts from top on Katrina response
http://today.reuters.com/investing/financeArticle.aspx?type=bondsNews&storyID=2005-09-15T201703Z_01_N14505805_RTRIDST_0_KATRINA-RESPONSE-REFILES.XML

WASHINGTON, Sept 15 (Reuters) - Under fire over the federal response to Hurricane Katrina, the White House and Homeland Security Department have offered conflicting accounts of who was in charge and when the administration first triggered what it promised would be a massive, organized federal response.

U.S. Senate investigators are looking closely at these inconsistencies and what some critics say was general confusion within the administration about what a newly created National Response Plan entailed.

Homeland Security Security Michael Chertoff waited nearly 36 hours after the Aug. 29 storm hit to designate then-FEMA Director Michael Brown as the "principal federal official" to coordinate the federal response, according to a memo Chertoff sent to fellow Cabinet members on Aug. 30.

In the same memo, Chertoff declared Katrina the first-ever "incident of national significance" -- an announcement touted the next day by the White House as key to setting in motion a carefully choreographed response and recovery effort.

But according to government documents, congressional aides and Homeland Security officials, what first triggered the "incident of national significance" was not Chertoff's memo, but a little-noticed statement issued by the White House on the night of Aug. 27 while President George W. Bush was still vacationing at his Crawford, Texas ranch.

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adaada Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Ultimately, Bush bears the blame for the lack of response.
Whether it is a question of cronies who were unprepared for the job, a poor reorganizaton plan (the national disaster response plan) and/or implementation of that plan under FEMA and Homeland Security, or his own failure to recognize and respond to the disaster is merely an academic question (although an interesting one).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jarab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Welcome, adaada!
...O...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC