Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Letters reveal Miers' profound admiration for Bush (crush?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:14 PM
Original message
Letters reveal Miers' profound admiration for Bush (crush?)
Edited on Mon Oct-10-05 08:16 PM by sabra

http://www.sunherald.com/mld/sunherald/news/nation/12868383.htm


Letters reveal Miers' profound admiration for Bush

Knight Ridder Newspapers


AUSTIN, Texas - (KRT) - Harriet Miers, President Bush's nominee for the Supreme Court, quickly developed a deep and almost gushing admiration for her boss from her earliest days in Texas government.

"You are the best governor ever - deserving of great respect!" she wrote in 1997, in a belated birthday note that was typical of the tone she used in her correspondence with then-Gov. Bush.

The letter was one of a handful of personal notes included in more than 2,000 pages of documents released Monday by the Texas State Library - most of them routine legal memos, press releases and transcripts. The letters offer a rare glimpse into the mutual admiration that sprung up between Miers and Bush after they began working together on Bush's first campaign for Texas governor in 1994.

Bush responded to her birthday wish in kind, and included a humorous, if baffling, postscript.


"I appreciate your friendship and candor. Never hold back your sage advice," he wrote. "P.S. No more public scatology." Whether Bush was referring to Miers' rough-and-tumble time as chairwoman of the Texas Lottery Commission or something else isn't clear. Scatology refers to "the study of or preoccupation with excrement or obscenity," according to Webster's dictionary.





wow, just wow :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. oh fer chrissake...

i think i'm going to puke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaq Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. I told you, I told you , I told all of you!!!!!!!!!
Miers is his secret girlfriend! She's been waxing his boots all along. If he doesn't make her a Supreme Court justice, then she's going to scream!!! (Not just in a sexual way either!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. "scatology" -- Bullshit, who here believes BUSH used that word?
Probably can't even pronounce it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. No more public ""scatology"
Edited on Mon Oct-10-05 08:46 PM by bahrbearian
he just wanted to play with it private "the study of or preoccupation with excrement or obscenity" I'm sure he is well aware of the meaning of the word. He is the spawn of Barbara.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swimboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #13
89. But that would make him a coprophile.
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickgutierrez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. He's probably referring to her singing style
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. LOL! Or maybe he likes to fling poop from his desk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
32. so that's where "catapult the propaganda" really comes from (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #32
67. ROFL....that's a good one. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
38. HAHAHAHAHAHAH......where's Jane Goodall when you need her?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. Just to visualize it.......
;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #42
66. Excellent. LOL. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
40. No telling what the hell Bush thinks the word means. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #40
86. Bull sh*t
I think he meant Bull Sh*t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swimboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #40
88. Maybe he meant eschatology.
Nah. That's an SAT word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. he probably meant scientology LOL
I wonder....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
53. well, ummm
maybe * is a scatologist himself! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
all.of.me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
71. rofl - that was my first thought!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #71
82. yep it'sa promise, not an admonishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
info being Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
73. could be a skull & bones codeword
maybe that's where he learned it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #73
83. means he'll quit calling her "Miers-Weiner" in public in the new year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daninthemoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
76. Bet you five bucks he meant something else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. These droids are truly warped beyond human recognition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Obsequious
Did I spell it right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. He probably thinks she's a jazz singer.........
:shrug: That worm would never use that word let alone know it's meaning. So what the hell is their point of bringing this "crap" up, pardon the pun?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. ROTFLMAO hee hee....good one! No, no way would he use that word,
at least not as it's meant to be used...he's too pathetically stupid for that. (He does, after all, think that "disassemble" means to tell a lie...what an ignorant fucker.)
Jazz singer, hee hee....
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
49. Well, she might've taught him a new pillow talk word
it could also mean she might have helped him scour his Texas driver's lis, and any other scatology he needed to hide so he could look like the salt of the earth presidential candidate that they both could love and behold. No more public shit, or no more shit in the news.

My bet is she has been his most willing and admiring enabler; that he used her as a confident; she knows most of his scatology; and probably has told her quite a bit of The Bush Family scatology too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Word Has It She Doesn't "Like" Men (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaq Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
28. Honey, who says Bush was a "MAN" anyway?
\
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rexcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bush seems to like older women who have never married...
Rice, now Miers. There seems to be a pattern developing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karla Marx Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. talk about a toady
It got her a good job, though. She knows how to play our little chimperor. She's no dummy; the only thing the king responds to is flattery. The WH is like some royal court, only more deranged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. Where's her blue dress?
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. she doesn't need a blue dress
I heard she borrowed O'Vibelly's vibe ... :evilgrin:

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaq Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
31. The Bush twins are wearing it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #31
98. Quick, someone get Louis Freeh on the horn
to go get a Pretzedential DNA sample!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. "The love that dare not speak its name....
The Harrie-Bushie story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunnystarr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #11
78. harrie bush?? sounds like scatology to me lol (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. "Lightweight" doesn't quite say it
...In a 1995 note, she thanked Bush for a visit and called a ride in a plane with him "Cool!" When she wrote Bush a thank-you note for meeting with a lottery job applicant in 1997, she wrote, "You are the best!"

That could have been ripped from an entry at Harriet Miers's Blog!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. A real meeting of the minds, when they get together, ...
... sounds like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. ....or the psychiatric study of such an obsession!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
19. like a dumb nerd school girl who got some attention from BMOC!!!
(Big Man on Campus!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #19
87. That's What I Think, Miers Is Standard Talent Sucking Up Trying To Be
"girlie" and getting ahead in a man's world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
21. Proving she couldn't write "opinion" if her life depended on it.
She will be there TOTALLY as Bush's and Scalia's servant.

You know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #21
81. Yeah well, someone has to make the coffee
and I hear Ruth Ginsberg actually has a job on the court already as a real judge.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FightingIrish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
22. An email forwarded by a prominent Republican friend
It's second or third hand but still juicy.

Subject: Harriet Miers ... a personal testimonial

I wanted to share this email with you I received yesterday. It is from someone I know who lived in Texas for a number of years, is extremely responsible, not prone to gossip and never has never sent me one political email until now -- therefore this is something she obviously feels strongly about. Keeping her personal experience (of Harriet Miers) in mind , I hope you will read it.

Thanks,

Carol

---Original Message-----
Sent: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 17:44:17 -0400


Friends:
Some of you have asked about Patricia's connection with Harriet Miers during her Texas Lottery days. For those who have not asked, we thought you too would find the following summary interesting.
Hank . . .

I've been burning up the wires talking to former Lottery buddies about dear Harriet. In the old Lottery days we used to hear that "Shrub" was building up his coffers to run for President. We laughed but not too hard because we saw how he took the election away from Ann Richards. Then we heard the scuttlebutt about his lawyer, Harriet Miers, that one day he planned to nominate her for the Supreme Court. We sure didn't laugh after we met her. Here we are after all these years, and as rumored, she's been nominated. Are we surprised? No.

Harriet was the Chair of the Texas Lottery Commission from 1995 to 2000. I saw her frequently during these years because the Commission meetings were held almost every other month-sometimes monthly during the Texas Legislative Session. During the time I was Assistant Marketing Director and then Acting Marketing Director (1997-2000), I was asked to respond to Harriet's frequent phone calls and questions about issues facing us during the Legislative sessions and during other crises. I never spoke to her on the phone (it was always through the Director's or General Counsel's office), however, during presentations made at Commission meetings and at testimony before the Texas Legislature, I faced her serious, dour and always direct demeanor. You had to answer Harriet's questions directly, promptly and unequivocally-no pussy-footing around with this woman.

Harriet never cracked a smile (funny to see her barely smiling in the photos lately). Oddly enough, I thought she was 60 years old 10 years ago. Unlike other commission members, she was not friendly to Lottery staff, rarely gave compliments and was considered a complete "h ard ass." Everyone saw her as extremely demanding and intimidating. Also unlike other Commissioners, I noticed that she was very cautious about revealing where she stood on issues, always letting the other Commissioners state their positions before she stated hers.

I would describe her as cold and cunning. I think her lack of humanity (although certainly not desirable in a judge) worries me less than her "fundy" religion and probable pro-life philosophy. In my view, the prospect of her making it to the Big Bench is worrisome-worse, frightening.

Patricia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lautremont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
23. Didn't el pretzeldent go on about "poology" once?
It was either a real bushism or a parody of same - so difficult to tell them apart sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
24. Chimpy's been using that Thesaurus again
they should hide them from him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
25. The nomination is a quid pro quo for covering his ass re: TANG.
And the right wing should be worried about the nomination of someone who probably never once told Bush something that he din't want to hear. Bush may be too stupid to discern between judicial wisdom and butt-kissing but the Federalist Society knows the difference.

Aside from all of that, her adoration of him is fucking creepy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
26. There is something very icky about the way they look at each other...
In 1996, he looks downright possessive of her here (he also looks pissed)



Their vibes positively scream something deeper than friendship still.





My affairdar says there is something sick and illicit between them, but I don't think its sex. Her eyes remind me of Canada's mass murderer Karla Homolka and Chimpy is a proven psychopath. I think that's their attraction for each other.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #26
92. Is that bottom picture of her, too?
She looks pissed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #92
95. No, that's Karla Homolka
who's a serial killer from Ontario. There is quite a resemblance in how they both play up and use their eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vektor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
27. Good god, it gets weirder every second!
What the hell is up with those two?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clydefrand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
29.  No more public scatology." The study of his
Edited on Mon Oct-10-05 09:40 PM by clydefrand
public bullshit! Laura must have helped him with that word. She should know it since she's married to a pile of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drmom Donating Member (450 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
33. Eeewwww....
Just the thought of the possibilities is way to much...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nookiemonster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
34. I'm calling bullshit on this,
because of redundancy!

:sarcasm:

"Scatology", heh! That's way too many syllables for the douchebag-in-chief.

:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
35. Words escape me right now!!! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
36. So, She slept to the top, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. She's a climer alright! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Yuck yuck yuck... who would sleep with dat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
41. But, she is gay. Must be fascination at an intellectual level, a very low
leval at that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. seems like brownnosing to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #44
85. The new Brownie! Heckuva job, Brownie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sabriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
43. Sounds a bit too much like middle school
"Mr. Wilson, you are the best teacher ever! I Heart Your Class!!! Friends 4Ever!!!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
45. BLECH!!!! DISGUSTING!
What kind of deviant could have a crush on THAT?

SCATOLOGY?? Oh for the love of all things holy, these people are such weirdos, total bizarro land!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
46. Does this mean that Bush is a scat queen?
Eeeeeek!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #46
84. He did name the Rover
Edited on Tue Oct-11-05 10:30 AM by JoFerret
Turdblossom after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
47. Nommed Because It's So Damned Bizarre.
I mean seriously -- these people are from another planet! GEEKS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
48. Maybe he prefers private scatology.
There could be more to this than...ahem...meets the eye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
50. Looks like Miers had a firm
lip lock on *'s behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
51. So Miers fucked Bush...big deal...she's still not qualified for the job!
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #51
94. Depends...
Supreme Court--no

Supreme Tart--well, it appears only Bush can answer that...}(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #51
132. that should make her eligible for "Fear Factor"! (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
52. I was disgusted when Chimp was installed in 2000
After the past five years, I have gone from disgust to loathing and now to complete, mind numbing horror. This has got to be not only the most unappealing bunch of human-like things to occupy power in this country, but the most brutal, and the most deeply psychotic.

To combine, as they have, arrogance, incompetence, greed, and insanity, is something that must have the rest of the world wondering if we have all lost our minds to allow them to continue. Every day brings new revelations about more and more bizarre happenings.

Clinton had Monica, and the world watched, puzzled, as the American press and Ken Starr acted as if he had committed treason. We have a gay prostitute like Gannon wandering unchallenged through the halls of the White House for months and months, and nary an eyebrow is raised. It's as though it never happened. And this silence is coming from the religious right, and Xtian fundies, not to mention the press.

Every morning I wake up, and hope I have found my way back to the universe I was born in 62 years ago, and that this whole episode has either been an extremely long bad dream, or that the disturbance in the warp of reality has been somehow repaired, and I am back on the planet Earth I used to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
54. NYT: Documents Show Nominee's Close Personal Ties to Bush
By RALPH BLUMENTHAL and SIMON ROMERO
Published: October 11, 2005

AUSTIN, Tex., Oct. 10 - "You are the best governor ever - deserving of great respect," Harriet E. Miers wrote to George W. Bush days after his 51st birthday in July 1997. She also found him "cool," said he and his wife, Laura, were "the greatest!" and told him: "Keep up the great work. Texas is blessed."

Ms. Miers, President Bush's personal lawyer and his selection for a Supreme Court seat, emerges as an unabashed fan in more than 2,000 pages of official correspondence and personal notes made public on Monday by the Texas State Library and Archives Commission in response to open-records requests.

Mr. Bush returned the admiration, the files show. After Ms. Miers's birthday wishes, he wrote thanks and a "happy 52nd to you." He added, "I appreciate your friendship and candor - never hold back your sage advice."

The documents, including many minutes of meetings of the Texas Lottery Commission, which Ms. Miers headed, shed little light on her legal thinking, but underscore her ties to Mr. Bush. Because of their closeness and her lack of a judicial record, some critics have dismissed Ms. Miers as a crony unworthy of nomination to the court but for her confidential service as the president's lawyer.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/11/politics/politicsspecial1/11archive.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. Sycophant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #54
56. Her idolization of that schmuck does not reflect well on her judgement.
It is sickening....like the follower of some cult leader trying to get in his good graces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #56
58. No kidding, she reminds me of that crazed Bushbot lady at the RNC
standing in adoration of her king. Can someone post the pic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorkiemommie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #54
57. eewwwwwwwwww.....
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #57
72. ditto.......nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbeach Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #54
59. depends on her definition of "' blessed"
"Texas is blessed."

thats a scary thought that some state is blessed to have a bush live in it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #54
60. She's gonna "vote the way Bush's heart wants her to vote"...
...and she's "not gonna change in 20 years"...

Wow, talk about a step WAY BACKWARD for America...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #54
61. For 2nd time in all my time here @ DU I must use the puke smily
again :puke:

First time was 10 minutes ago on similar topic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #54
62. She sounds like a freakin' stalker! Seriously.
I actually thought maybe she could be his paramour... aka Poppy and his lady friend. Sounds like she's just obsessed with the man. Ugh. I think her terrible taste, judgement, and worst use of eyeliner (ever), should disqualify her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
63. Gppd gravy, that is some STRANGE correspondence! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
64. and they called it Puppy Looooove...
Edited on Tue Oct-11-05 06:11 AM by Triana
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
65. Forget political experts, we need mental health ones to assess BushCo. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
68. What does he mean...
"no more PUBLIC scatology?" Where did she/they display PUBLIC scatology? And is PRIVATE scatology OK with him?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
69. Love,
Harriet
xoxoxoxo

:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
70. if a female aide had written this to Clinton...
you know what the republicans would be saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
74. Same story NYTimes....she sounds like a GROUPIE not Supreme Court Justice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moosepoop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
75. He learned the word "scatology" from Gen. Schwarzkopf
http://www.keepmedia.com/pubs/USNewsWorldReport/2003/03/31/12487

<snip>
U.S.News & World Report

The Quiet Commander
By Richard J. Newman; Elaine M. Grossman | Mar 31 '03

Here's one thing the second gulf war lacks: a Stormin' Norman. During Operation Desert Storm 12 years ago, Gen. H. Norman Schwarzkopf stole the show, captivating Americans with colorful phrases like "bovine scatology" (the response to a question about a battlefield rumor). By comparison, the generals running Operation Iraqi Freedom seem more like an anonymous supporting cast. Gen. Tommy Franks, who's running the war, is famously uncomfortable in the spotlight. His subordinate commanders follow his lead and stay in the shadows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olddad56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
77. Condi is going to be so jealous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #77
90. So the difference between Clinton and Bush is that
Clinton had only one Monica, Details investigated and released for public embarrassment.

Bush has numerous flings without any investigation? We need the facts, where, when, what positions... No, on second thought I would prefer not to have the details, just the reporting that they happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #77
91. What is wrong with these women?
Their obsession with this decidedly half-witted, completely non-sexy man is bizarre. Both Harriet and Condi act like pre-pubescent girls who've never been kissed.
Springer was reading from the correspondence this morning: "You're the coolest guy ever!" (what woman speaks like that? embarrassing.) And, "He's the most brilliant man I ever met!"
Now we know what happened to that girl who always had her homework done early, asked for extra credit projects, and stayed home on the weekend studying. She became a Bush groupie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #91
101. Not to mention Karen Hughes
who abandoned her husband and child to be with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #91
133. Bush is like the male version of that "Red Dwarf" character ...
Edited on Wed Oct-12-05 08:11 PM by Lisa
A female extraterrestrial who appeared to be an "ideal mate" -- appearance, personality, etc. were so malleable that she was able to conform perfectly to the other person's expectations. It's been argued elsewhere that Bush is such a bland, unexceptional guy that people are able to read a lot of stuff into him, should they be so inclined.

I wasn't geeky enough to be like that "girl who always had her homework done early", but I was just geeky enough to like SF!

p.s. I don't find it too much of a stretch to imagine that someone who's got some brains (Condi and maybe Harriet) would fantasize about having a less-intelligent partner so she could boss him around. Or that someone who's ambitious (both Condi and Harriet, for sure) would fall for a guy who might be in a position to help one's career. But what I do find disturbing is that they'd both be able to ignore the fact that he's got tendencies towards abuse (of substances and people). And that they both seem perfectly willing to jump in and help him get what he wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
79. OK... You really need a barf alert on this post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunnystarr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
80. "P.S. No more public scatology."
Edited on Tue Oct-11-05 10:16 AM by sunnystarr
imho I think it's a reference to *'s obscenity. I'm sure Harrie frowned on his continuous use of *uck and similar speech that he's famous for using off camera. So it looks like he was telling her that he would stop using it publicly. Which of course is similar to him telling Laura that he'd stop drinking.

On edit: I don't think the word is from Bush but rather from Harriet to Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
93. That's what you call "brown-nosing"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #93
100. By George, I think you've got it! W was telling her to quit brown nosing
him in public and at the same time letting her know that the stuff she did to him in private was still ok - not just ok but probably welcome!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
96. Just the love of a cult member for the cult leader.
Happens all the time in cults people. Nothing to see here, move along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #96
99. Don't most people like Bush on a personal level?
At one time even Kennedy was popping popcorn and playing footsie with Bush while they watched movies in the White House. Most people who meet him admit he is rather dim but likable. But what does that prove about Miers' ability on the SCOTUS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #99
103. I think cult members are a bad idea for SCOTUS or any other power position
I want people who are able to evaluate and reason. I don't think that's a cult member attribute.

And I doubt most people do like bush on a personal level. That is the spin, but you don't have to believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
97. Who knew you could nominate a 12 year old girl to SCOTUS?? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
102. She was just kissing ass just to get in there
......or something else?:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthpusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
104. The Harriet And George Letters ("You are the best Governor ever...!")
Edited on Wed Oct-12-05 06:57 PM by truthpusher
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1012055miers1.html


The Harriet And George Letters
------------------
Bush-Miers Texas correspondence reveals mutual admiration society
------------------
OCTOBER 12--Sure, nobody seems to know anything about Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers's judicial philosophy, abortion position, or conservative bona fides. But here's something not open for debate: the old gal loves exclamation points and seemed to enjoy writing gushy notes to then-Governor George W. Bush. Below you'll find copies of personal correspondence exchanged between Bush and Miers from 1995-2000 (before migrating to Washington, Miers headed the Texas State Lottery Commission, a post to which Bush appointed her). The Bush-Miers letters were among more than 2000 pages of documents released this week by the Texas State Library and Archives Commission. In a 1997 Hallmark greeting card (adorned with a photo of a dog), Miers sent along belated birthday wishes and noted that "You are the best governor ever--deserving of great respect!" In another note (penned on an American Greetings card), Miers wrote that she hoped Bush's daughters realized that their parents were "cool." A 1995 Miers note thanked Bush for a visit, adding that an airplane ride with the governor was "Cool!" Sadly, the document dump did not include Miers's e-mail or IM messages, which are surely filled with loads of sappy emoticons. (18 pages)





Lots more here: http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1012055miers1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #104
105. This is just so damned pathetic.
It makes me want to hurl.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #105
108. Should be "not younger than "I": jeez, what atrocious grammar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #108
113. "Me" is actually correct. Technically. "I" is considered pretentious.
The B.S. we learned as kids is for "polite" conversation, but not exactly grammatically correct. There is nothing actually wrong with "me" in most cases.

Sorry...just one of my grammatical pet peeves...like using too many elipses...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #113
120. If I was a rich man, maybe my grammatical errors would be fewer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #113
123. But you wouldn't say "you are younger than me am"
and "am" is the understood, unspoken verb.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #123
129. oh fer chrissake!
I didn't say "I" wasn't a word!

Most have us have been told since childhood that it is incorrect to say "Harriet and me went swimming." Or, "It was okay with Harriet and me." We're always told it is supposed to be "...Harriet and I."

All I was saying is that using ME here is not incorrect. I may be more polite sounding to say ...Harriet and I, but that doesn't make the use of "me" wrong.

Now, if you were to say "Harriet and Condi..." well, that's a whole different, very gross, story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #129
131. You've lost me. Or I've lost you.
S'okay. Nevermind. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #113
130. It is not correct. Technically or otherwise.
Maybe you're thinking of constructions like "between you and I", which is wrong, probably out of pretension. The problem today is they don't teach kids to diagram sentences.

Or maybe you're thinking of situations where people say "it's me." Technically it should be "it is I", but today that sounds stilted and formal, so "it's me" is acceptable as colloquial speech. (Writing--Standard Written English--is supposed to be more formal.)

In the Harriet Meier example, it was an informal note, but she could have just finessed the issue by finishing the thought and saying "younger than I am".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #130
134. Thanks...I tried
:)

Nothing makes my brain hurt more than incorrect corrections.

Betty, copy editor with a migraine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #130
135. You're right. I gave a horrible example.
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vanje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #104
106. dear Harriet,
You are the best boot-licker EVER!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #104
107. Yeah, but did you see THIS one??!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #107
114. Too funny!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #104
109. I'd love to see these letters on SNL or the Daily Show done
with voiceovers. Maybe the Daily Show could have the kids read them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #104
110. OK. Letter #2 (GWB to Harriet) has the following interesting postscript...
It says, "P.S.: No more public scatology!"

"scatological" is the Latinate term for material that has to do with bodily functions normally considered obscene. I come across it mainly in connection with scatological satire (Pope harshing on hack writers by analogizing what they produce to shit, etc.).

So WTF does this postscript mean? Which of them was engaged in public scatology, and what did it involve? Was Harriet Miers the first to pioneer that "milking the male horse" routine of Laura's, or did George refer to poopies during some Teas GOP event, or what?

Yeesh,

The Plaid Adder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #110
126. Or perhaps she briefly came to her senses, and blurted out ...
"Oh, s***!" as she looked over at Georgie, and realized who she was attempting to cozy up to? And he heard her, but didn't suspect that she had momentary bouts of sanity? (If that's the case, there might be hope for her yet.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #104
111. If it was not so pathetic, it would be funny. It comes off like some sort
Edited on Wed Oct-12-05 07:02 PM by BrklynLiberal
of SNL skit.
The only thing that even came close to this pathetic was when they published the idiotic love notes between Prince Charles and whats-her-face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #104
112. Don't forget the weird one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #112
116. "All my best"
Must not have been very good, whatever his best was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #104
115. too funny-these 2 make are truly creepy couple
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #104
117. awww
i you wicked Lots governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LatinoSocialist Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #104
118. even Better than Reagan?
Isn't that sacrilege against one of the Republican sacred tenets?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #104
119. So, he's nominating a women who has a crush on him?
This is her biggest selling point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #104
121. Scatologically Yours Forever, Harriet!!!!

:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #121
122. Maybe it refers to her pet name for him...
Shit for brains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #104
124. Duplicate topic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #104
125. Jeebus Christ on a friggin' crutch.
This woman is W's personal cheerleader--they oughta just put her in the skirt and pom-poms for her hearings so she can chant about how great she thinks he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
127. Easy now, it's perfectly natural for chimps to play with their POOP!nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nvliberal Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
128. Actually, Bush's p.s. is appropriate
for somebody who was and is clearly a brown-noser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC