Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Thousands of Demolitions Near, New Orleans Braces for New Pain

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 11:12 PM
Original message
NYT: Thousands of Demolitions Near, New Orleans Braces for New Pain
NEW ORLEANS, Oct. 22 - As crews begin inspecting thousands of rotting houses and preservationists begin efforts to save them, city and federal officials say that 30,000 to 50,000 of the city's houses will probably have to be demolished.

That number, though smaller than some earlier predictions, nonetheless represents more than a quarter of the city's housing stock. A few weeks from now, when giant track excavators begin tearing into homes that once sheltered families and nest eggs, the city will experience one of the most painful moments of its ordeal.

"Really, the whole scope of this thing is hard to get your mind around," said Allen Morse, who will be in charge of the demolition effort for the Army Corps of Engineers. "It's going to be a huge task."

Already the dreaded bright red-orange stickers blaring "unsafe" have begun to proliferate on houses, signaling what is becoming a passionate debate over the extent of the demolition.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/23/national/nationalspecial/23demolish.html?hp&ex=1130126400&en=3e333008113e35c9&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
meisje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. anything made of wood will have to be dozed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Careful around those levees please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Absolutely false
Homes build in the 19th century and before--using cypress and virgin pine and construction techniques that address pervasive dampness and periodic flooding, need not be demolished. Most of these homes have been flooded several times before.

It's the suburban ranch-on-a-slab homes in Lakeview and New Orleans East, for example, that are mostly likely doomed.

Most of the Ninth Ward had water up to seven feet above the ground floor in Hurricane Betsy, for example.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. you are mistaken if you think the lower 9th ward was built in 19th c.
Edited on Sun Oct-23-05 06:37 PM by pitohui
i'm shaking my head at the wrong-headedness of this claim, it just ain't so

don't expect you to believe pitohui, so why don't you read a history of the place:

http://www.gnocdc.org/orleans/8/22/snapshot.html

By 1950, only half of the Lower Ninth Ward had been developed. Industrial development during this time was along the dry docks of the Industrial Canal with a few scattered uses appearing in predominately residential sectors at the north end of the neighborhood. In the late 1950s, the second bridge between the city and the Lower Ninth Ward, The Judge William Seeber Bridge, known locally as the Claiborne Avenue Bridge, was built across the Industrial Canal at Claiborne Avenue. Retail development along St. Claude Avenue became notable during this period and the trend of corner stores continued. By 1965 commercial activity along St. Claude continued to grow and industrial development accelerated in the strip bordering the Industrial Canal between Claiborne and Florida Avenues. Scattered industrial and commercial uses throughout residential areas of the district continued as well.



i do know folks w. a house built of cypress, in mid-city tho, & guess what, it has mold & has had it for at least 15 yrs, it has also had to be treated in a termite tent at great expense, the myth of the immortal cypress is just that, a myth -- oh it was built in 1917, which i consider the 20th century, yet it has still had serious issues over the years requiring over two hundred thousand dollars in restoration

the place should be rebuilt on stilts, as should gentilly and lakeview, or the levees should be built to a higher standard OR BOTH

the gov't should not cheap out, ppl were told they didn't need flood insurance, that it was zone c, the gov't should recompense them handsomely & not just give them a couple thousand bucks to gut their seriously damaged homes

no excuses, dangerous homes should be bulldozed and replaced, ppl should not be returned to danger yet again

but do not tell people their destroyed homes weren't destroyed, it's just silliness & a refusal to face up to the size & expense of the job ahead of us

here are some photos taken by a friend who prefers to remain anonymous from the 9th ward near the breach:









denial isn't helping anyone move forward

condemn the totalled homes, put the money in people's hands, & give them a damn grant to rebuild on stilts

don't put ppl back in harm's way by telling them what is cheap & easy to say, how many times does the damn neighborhood have to be wiped out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Are we speaking specifically of the Ninth Ward?
Then, no.

Which Ninth Ward are we speaking of? Holy Cross? The area between St. Claude and Florida? Or Desire.

There are more than one Ninth Ward, in many ways.

I am taking about the statement that all wood construction will have to be demolished. I still asser that is flatly wrong.

Most of what you are thinking of as the Ninth Ward is post war construction, and was innundated longer and deeper than Betsy, and is likely to face demolition.

Like the Ninth Ward, Lakeview--which is largely mid- to late-twentieth century construction--will likely have to be demolished.

Other areas of the city, I would argue, may or may not. In particular, I worry about the nineteenth century housing stock of the flood prone parts of Uptown and Midcity. Yes, houses in New Orleans have mold problems. And the nasty Formosan Termites are an entirely seperate discussion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. How many missing loved ones will be bull dozed in those homes?
Edited on Sat Oct-22-05 11:43 PM by fearnobush
I say at least two thousand.

Passerby discovers decomposing body hidden among storm debris

01:18 PM CDT on Friday, October 21, 2005

WWLTV.com

New Orleans Police are trying to identify a body which was found Friday morning among debris left over from Hurricane Katrina.


At about 9 a.m., someone on North Rampart and Elysian Fields found the body on the neutral ground and flagged down some National Guard troops.


The body had been put in a trunk and was badly decomposed.


Authorities have not identified the body, and were unsure of the gender of the body. Police ruled it an unclassified death as of Friday afternoon.

<http://www.wwltv.com/local/stories/wwl102105body.1178defe8.html>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It's shameful. It's criminal.
:cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:

RIP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brer cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Who is making the choices...art dealers and hairdressers????
Adding to the text above from the same article:

"The process has not been without hiccups. The Shaw Group, the construction company that is providing many of the inspectors to the corps, provoked complaints this week from the corps and city building officials that some people hired as inspectors, including a retired art dealer and a hairdresser, were unqualified to make structural appraisals."

I know and love many hairdressers and art dealers, but I would NEVER ask one to to provide advise on structural damage to my house! Sounds like asking a vet to be a woman's doctor to me...typical bush ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Excellent post! Welcome aboard!
I'd forgotten about the vet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Not quite. More like asking a hairdresser or art dealer to be a
woman's doctor.

A bit of information for you and the other vet-haters who abound on DU: veterinarians are doctors. So are physicians. Those poor uneducated, limited things (the physicians)are qualified to work on only one species. We (the vets) are qualified to work on ALL THE OTHERS. Who knows more?

Of course, if you subscribe to the fundamentalist belief that man was created by god in god's image, and the lowly animals are not related in any way to humans, then vets couldn't possibly know anything at all about human medicine. But as we know, man is merely one animal species among many, and a VERY close relative to other mammals.

We vets are REQUIRED to learn certain aspects of human medicine where they apply to public health and zoonotic diseases, as the physicians are woefully ignorant about these things for the most part (though one would think it's THEIR responsibility). I routinely have to do an obstetrician's job if a client gets pregnant and wants to know how to avoid getting toxoplasmosis. Generally her OB-Gyn pleads ignorance or gives gross misinformation.

:rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brer cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. no, no, no...i'm a vet lover
but just don't think that is the best choice that * admin had for women's health. I have had cats and dogs for 30 years, and my vets have been wonderful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Of course not. we all know that a research-oriented OB-Gyn
would be the best choice for that position as the head of Women's Health. But I got really ticked off at all the insults that were and still are being thrown around about veterinarians over it. Like we are too dumb to mop the floors, let alone be involved in a medical bureaucracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Who are you calling a jerk?
She has the right to speak her mind on DU without being attacked by you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. nice post, kestrel
here's a shout-out for the vets, mine is a real hero
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countmyvote4real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. What about the florists and the other gay stereotypes?
Don't you know there must have been some hair stylists that were speculating those properties?

Your gay hating agenda stops here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
watrwefitinfor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Welcome to DU, brer cat!
Edited on Sun Oct-23-05 06:27 AM by watrwefitinfor
:hi:

Don't let the hasty words take the wind out of your sails. DU is usually very friendly to newcomers. Sometimes we may be too quick to take umbrage at innocent remarks. We've been under a lot of pressure for the last, oh, five years or so.

Please don't be intimidated. We need people like you who see the Bush regime for what it is. I'm certain you will receive many more friendly welcomes here.

Wat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. well...not to defend the excesses of the shaw group but...
in many cases all you have to be is not be legally blind to see that a structure has to go

i'd be ok with my hairdresser slapping a condemned sticker on these houses in venice:



or this in the 9th ward:



reality is the zone of destruction is so huge that in many cases we just need bodies to get the paperwork rolling so ppl can get their damn settlements, get the damn mess knocked down, & start anew w. their lives

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. The Shaw Group
http://www.shawgrp.com/About/default.aspx

Don't know much about it.

Might be interesting to look into it though.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. there's some grumbling
the usual grumbling that they are padding expenses, etc.

i don't know anything other than a few muttered rumors tho

could be perfectly legitimate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. are the MORTGAGES and monthly payments being bulldozed too? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. Hi brer cat!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
18. Years ago my family had two homes in a small
flood.One had three feet of water for 24 hours. We had to take all the insides out up to that height. Even with that work we still had problems with mold in places we did not find it for years after.

The other house had water up to six feet for 48 hours. It was intact but would have had to be totally refurbished to make it livable. It is not just about wood and foundations. It also means plaster walls, inside block walls, mold that can cause health issues for years to come. If we had it to do again my family would have been better off if we would have realized just how dangerous our home was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
19. House that were owned by poor people will be the ones to go first
Edited on Sun Oct-23-05 06:25 PM by SoCalDem
because once the "property" is just a plot of sewage/oil soaked dirt, the value of it is negligible, and they will have to accept pennies in compensation.. If they had a mortgage, the bank will claim the land and the people will just have to walk away.. there is nothing to "sell", so there is no way to "make money".. If the home was owned outrignt, the record sear4ch that would prove it will take a lot longer than the demolition, and the people who owned it are probably cooling their heels in Deadwood South Dakota or Houston, and they will find out about their property in a letter , some months from now..

The "Old" floods were silt, water and sewage,..The "new" floods are a petro-chemical stew that NO ONE knows the long term exposure risks..

I think that people whose homes were totally damaged, might not even want to risk their children's lives on returning..

It's a shame..all around, but I don't see the "Old New Orleans" re-emerging..

The Garden district, the port district, the FQ and the chemical areas will still be there, but the rest is up for grabs.. The greediest will be the winners..

Poor people will no longer call NO home

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. why so negative?
because once the "property" is just a plot of sewage/oil soaked dirt, the value of it is negligible, and they will have to accept pennies in compensation..

this is not the case, no one is giving pennies on the dollar in compensation

i know a woman whose house was appraised at $170,000 before katrina in st. bernard parish, it was wiped out of course but it was part of the murphy oil spill, murphy oil has already made her an offer of $220,000 -- that is not pennies on the dollar, that is a small bonus for her trouble, altho agreed the woman would have rather had her home but she already knows she won't be allowed to rebuild on that spot

& of course most homes are not located in the oil spill area but if they are, i already know for a fact that murphy oil is not going away, they are going to do the right thing because they are going to bring this refinery back online

ppl don't really need to hear a lot of negativity right now & in any case i don't think murphy oil intends to cheat anyone, maybe don't take their first offer, but what i'm hearing is pretty fair

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC