Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY Times: Aide to Cheney Appears Likely to Be Indicted

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:20 PM
Original message
NY Times: Aide to Cheney Appears Likely to Be Indicted
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 09:25 PM by Syrinx
WASHINGTON, Oct. 27 - Associates of I. Lewis Libby Jr., Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, expected an indictment on Friday charging him with making false statements to the grand jury in the C.I.A. leak inquiry, lawyers in the case said Thursday.

Karl Rove, President Bush's senior adviser and deputy chief of staff, will not be charged on Friday, but will remain under investigation, people briefed officially about the case said. As a result, they said, the special counsel in the case, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, was likely to extend the term of the federal grand jury beyond its scheduled expiration on Friday.

As rumors coursed through the capital, Mr. Fitzgerald gave no public signal of how he intends to proceed, further intensifying the anxiety that has gripped the White House and left partisans on both sides of the political aisle holding their breath.

Mr. Fitzgerald's preparations for a Friday announcement were shrouded in secrecy, but advanced amid a flurry of behind-the-scenes discussions that left open the possibility of last-minute surprises. As the clock ticked down on the grand jury, people involved in the case did not rule out the disclosure of previously unknown aspects of the case.

http://nytimes.com/2005/10/28/politics/28leak.html?ei=5094&en=f4b9e5edc0a35fdf&hp=&ex=1130472000&partner=homepage&pagewanted=print
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. FITZMAS EVE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good! But we want Rove!
Rove is the trophy, the big prize, the prize that will render the Bush Administration impotent for the next 3 years. Bush cannot so much as shit in his pants without Karl Rove being there to wipe his ass for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
41. The NY Times was wrong about Iraq WMDs
... don't be surprisd if they're wrong about Turd Blossom...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
58. Um, doesn't W get permission to go to the bathroom from Condi?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. If Rove is not charged then he has flipped on somebody
or agreed to a plead guilty to something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Rove... ".. will remain under investigation".
And the GJ is being extended.

If anyone thinks Fitz is extending the GJ without real thing to continue to investigate, they have not leaned much about him.

Rove will get nailed... I have no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
47. I think the extra time is to squeeze Rove for all he's worth.
It's worth leaning heavily on Turd Blossom to see just how much he'll give up on Cheney's team. I have no idea if that's what Fitzgerald is doing, but it's an obvious enough course to follow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeunderdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #47
123. Mixed blessing for the WH
They hate that every night is filled with speculation. I think they'd prefer to know that he is going to be charged so they can cut a plea. The media attention is killing their agenda.

The nightly coverage is delicious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
57. Fitzgerald paid a visit to Luskin late Wednesday, I think
Or was it Tuesday?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
63. A possibility. He may be doing a Novak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #63
71. What the hell happened to Novak, anyway?
I haven't seen him since he stormed off CNN, apparently drunk, saying something was "bullshit."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #71
125. He most probably cooperated. Who knows? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. What does being briefed "officially" entail?
Unless I hear it from Fitz, I'm not believing anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I bet someone from Fitz's office was told to make a courtesy call
and let BushCo know what was going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Halliburton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
29. luskin has been associated with that moniker
so don't take much into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
124. Libby probably got a letter telling him he would be indicted
Fitzpatrick met with Rove's attorney, perhaps on a plea deal which, according to Rawstory, was turned down.

Fitzpatrick will impanel a new grand jury to look at forgery of documents. This investigation will surely make Cheney a target of a criminal investigation.

The MSM media is going bonkers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DubyaSux Donating Member (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Rove Not To Be Charged...
....talk about anti-climatic (if true).

Article here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Is this true?
I hope Rove is indicted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. If true the jury was going to be extended and Rove still under
investigation. Sounds even more ominous for Rove to me! Go get him Fitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
48. Yes, for Rove it is the death of a thousand cuts.
The agony of not knowing goes on and on and on for him. This makes me happy. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat in Tallahassee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. at least not tomorrow, but it goes on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. So Rove is the rat
turns on his own - how clever! Bush will be very pleased!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Hold it. Read the article!
"Karl Rove, President Bush's senior adviser and deputy chief of staff, will not be charged on Friday, but will remain under investigation, people briefed officially about the case said. As a result, they said, the special counsel in the case, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, was likely to extend the term of the federal grand jury beyond its scheduled expiration on Friday."

In other words, he's NOT off the hook yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. I was told by someone who spoke with const. lawyers that
Fitz really can't extend this grand jury (except maybe from a Friday to a Monday due to illness or something quickly resolved) and that he will have to call a new grand jury, no matter what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #19
37. Yes he can, he has to go to a judge to get authority this time, though
He cannot do it on his own. See here: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051026/ap_on_go_pr_wh/cia_leak_investigation;_ylt=AtJsYjGj.0O5gwkUY2DqK76s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA2Z2szazkxBHNlYwN0bQ--

The money quote: It is possible for Chief U.S. District Judge Thomas Hogan to extend the life of the grand jury at Fitzgerald's request. Such a step would be taken in secret.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. It did say "likely to extend"...
Odds are he will do it, but he might not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
67. Why would he take more office space if not?
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 11:05 PM by Carolab
On edit: Just read on TWN that this was an error--apparently it's unconfirmed now and Clemons has retracted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
44. He could well be ratting the WHIOGs out!
Wouldn't surprise me. Rove is notorioous for calculating every angle...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Sludge says the same
yet Raw Story says the exact opposite--that Rove and Libby are getting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indie_voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. MHO, I don't think it's anti-climatic
This sentence is music to my ears:

Karl Rove, President Bush's senior adviser and deputy chief of staff, will not be charged on Friday, but will remain under investigation, people briefed officially about the case said.


"remain under investigation"

:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dagaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
55. Sure for another 3 years
"remain under investigation"

Basically Fitz is saying he's got nothing. Might need Rove to testify against someone...maybe Libby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsTheMediaStupid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Has KKKarl flipped on Bush?
Or is he just being slow-roasted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
68. He'd never give up his prince. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:42 AM
Response to Reply #15
117. Rove would sell his own mother for a dime, but not Bush.
Bush is his creation, his baby. And without Bush, Rove is nothing. Too much narcissistic ego involvement in his relationship with Bush to flip. Rove pulled something fancy in his last GJ testimony. Fitz is going to slow roast him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #117
126. Yes, until at some point Piggy smells his own flesh on the spit.
THEN, watch him squeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 04:49 AM
Response to Reply #126
127. That is true. But Rove always has tons of dirty tricks up his sleeve
He will not go quietly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. i'm waiting for Fitzgerald to say it before i take it as gospel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. turned state's evidence in exchange for immunity?
so that's why his lawyer was on the phone with Fitzgerald's office.

Could be good news. Who cares about the Rover? It's Cheney and Bush who need to be impaled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom_from_Chains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
53. That's what I was thinking was what his attorney's negotiation
was about. Letting Fitz know who Karl had to offer up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clydefrand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. If this is from the NYT, why isn't it on their website?
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM by clydefrand
Never mind, I see it there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. Rumor says
Rove won't be charged tomorrow, but remains under investigation...

We still don't know who the rumor comes from, so grains of salt all around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. Deserves a DU 4 paragraph snip - NYT: Aide to Cheney Appears Likely to Be
Aide to Cheney Appears Likely to Be Indicted in C.I.A. Leak Case

By DAVID JOHNSTON
and RICHARD W. STEVENSON
WASHINGTON, Oct. 27 - Associates of I. Lewis Libby Jr., Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, expected an indictment on Friday charging him with making false statements to the grand jury in the C.I.A. leak inquiry, lawyers in the case said Thursday.

Karl Rove, President Bush's senior adviser and deputy chief of staff, will not be charged on Friday, but will remain under investigation, people briefed officially about the case said. As a result, they said, the special counsel in the case, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, was likely to extend the term of the federal grand jury beyond its scheduled expiration on Friday.

As rumors coursed through the capital, Mr. Fitzgerald gave no public signal of how he intends to proceed, further intensifying the anxiety that has gripped the White House and left partisans on both sides of the political aisle holding their breath.

Mr. Fitzgerald's preparations for a Friday announcement were shrouded in secrecy, but advanced amid a flurry of behind-the-scenes discussions that left open the possibility of last-minute surprises. As the clock ticked down on the grand jury, people involved in the case did not rule out the disclosure of previously unknown aspects of the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigleaf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. Rove is the one I wanted the most.
I'll be pissed if he gets off. It's depressing what these guys get away with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alizaryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. Yuck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. What is that I smell....oh desperation...common odor these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. This line right here speaks volumes
Allies of Mr. Rove and Mr. Libby have hoped that Mr. Fitzgerald could be persuaded that any misstatements were inadvertent and not intended to conceal their actions from prosecutors.

I guess he could not be persuaded since Rove will still be under investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Giant Robot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. Ignore if you don't like foul language
But for fuck's sake?! What does Rove have to do sodomize a schoolyard full of kindergartners and then blow up a bus load of nuns before anyone charges him?! This has been going on for fucking years. Give me a break. He has to have so many skeletons in his closet that he can be charged with something. I understand this is not absolute yet until I hear it from Fitzgerald, and that if this is true, he will still be under investigation, but how much longer does this cartel get to operate as is?

Rant over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
28. I Call BULLSHIT Until I Hear From Fitz
"Karl Rove, President Bush's senior adviser and deputy chief of staff, will not be charged on Friday, but will remain under investigation, people briefed officially about the case said."

I call bullshit until I hear from Fitz or I know these "people briefed officially about the case". The NYT can not be trusted about this. It may be true, but I won't take their word for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #28
64. Rove is only next to Bush and Cheney for me...
Charging Rove would make me so very, very happy. He is an evil fuck, and deserves any bad things that come his way. He was the one who expedited the whole thing for Bush to take over our country. I hope he goes down in flames.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
33. Yeah, I agree
Getting Rove would have been nice. Very nice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
34. not true, the investigation is being extended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
59. It says he won't be charged along with Libby on Friday -
not that he won't be charged at all.

I can hope...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
30. The NYT is not about to mess up again--not at this point.
Rove will remain under investigation. The sources, at least, were officially briefed.


ARE YOU READY FOR FITZMAS MORNING? :party:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike_The_Computer Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
31. Safe to say, Rove did whatever he had to do to stay out of jail.
Bush is in a tough spot, now that his filthy co-conspirator confidant Rove may be turning on him. Keep him Rove in the White House? Risk letting him go? Junior is so screwed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. Like maybe rat out LIBBY?
He'd better make sure he has every T crossed and every I dotted. All it takes is someone close to him to flip without his knowledge, and he is totally HOSED...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
32. if it is going to be extended that is extremely important
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. YES,
it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
35. so, the whole country has to wait on Rove. Damn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
36. Yes, and the NYTimes is such a *reliable* source.
And, there's weapons of mass distruction in Iraq.
And, Bob Dole is an alien.
Pshaw!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. WH will be in a long drawn out legal proceeding!!--

......Yet any indictment would leave the White House facing the prospect of a drawn-out legal proceeding that is likely to touch on what Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney knew about the effort to deal with Mr. Wilson's criticism, as well as keeping a spotlight on the shortcomings in administration prewar intelligence about Iraq's weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. neither lawyer is talking.


.....Allies of Mr. Rove and Mr. Libby have hoped that Mr. Fitzgerald could be persuaded that any misstatements were inadvertent and not intended to conceal their actions from prosecutors.

In addition, they have hoped that the prosecutor would conclude it would be difficult to convince a jury that Mr. Rove or Mr. Libby had a clear-cut motive to misinform the grand jury. Lawyers for the two men declined to comment on their legal status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. My comment was not on this article,
but on the NYT losing all credibility by their coverage over the past five-plus years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. aaron brown and David Gergan talking now. cnn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Gergan said a new grand jury would be be assembled. this will be LONG
process folks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #46
54. Good that could only mean they are going deep. This deserves nothing
but the most extensive investigation in the history of this country. If proven no higher crime has been committed in the office of the president ever. I think if they can prove they blocked pre war intelligence we should turn them in to a world tribunal and they can be Saddam's cellmates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DLnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
49. Point to consider: If Rove avoided indictment by ratting out people
on the Cheney side, there is going to be some very bad blood between the whole Cheney-Rumsfield-Bolton-neocon group and shrub's ever-shrinking 'inner circle'. Rove might avoid indictment by ratting out a number of these guys, but the blowback will seriously erode his power. Specifically, the universal loyalty/fear that Rove used to command from all corners of the shrub deathstar is history. The disarray over Harriet is undoubtedly the first glimmer of a glorious unravelling as these creeps start taking revenge on each other. I love it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wookie294 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. If the choice is indicting Rove or Cheney, I'd pick Cheney
I'm hoping Rove won't be charged because he ratted out Cheney. Merry Fitzmas!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
51. Sounds like rove is bargaining
and the only thing he could bargain to get himself out of trouble is to turn in someone higher up than he. Which is....Bush himself!!

Merry Fitzmas!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CityDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
52. This sucks (if true)
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 10:06 PM by CityDem
Rove is the big fish in this matter and and it will really suck if he is not indicted tomorrow. Sure, Fitz may continue to investigate, but Rove would be indicted along with Libby if there was a solid case. While I am excited at the prospect of the Libby indictment, it is only for making false statements to the grand jury. No indictment for outing Plame -- this sucks even worse. The media whores will spin this as a technicality and the whole issue will blow over when the new scotus hearings begin. I sure hope this NYT report is off base.


on edit -- corrected spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
56. Charge Rove, Dammit!!!
Another lump of coal on Fitzmas.

Swell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
60. LIBBY??? The guy was unknown until a few months ago!
This is it? I guess we have to settle for this....later in the article.....

"Yet any indictment would leave the White House facing the prospect of a drawn-out legal proceeding that is likely to touch on what Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney knew about the effort to deal with Mr. Wilson's criticism, as well as keeping a spotlight on the shortcomings in administration prewar intelligence about Iraq's weapons."

I'm not sure there is a lot of consolation there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
61. One way or another, Rove is definitely in a heap of trouble.
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 10:51 PM by Independent_Liberal
No doubt about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
62. Don't worry, I think Rove will resign, even if not indicted.
The White House will not be able to justify keeping this man on board, and he will be busy defending himself. So he is out too. Mark my word.
RIH Karl Rove
October 28, 3005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
65. Its my understanding that Fitzgerald and Luskin have had past
collegial relations and perhaps that gave Luskin the angle to get Fitzgerald to refrain from moving against his client.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #65
73. Help--who's Luskin? --nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
66. Well, someone on DU asked for predictions the other night.
I said neither side will be happy.

There you have it. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #66
109. you did, didn't you.....
I felt bad then, but feel worse now. I wanted Roves head on a stake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
69. Losing Scooter is like castrating Cheney!!!
Fitz did his job and did it well!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edgewater_Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
70. It Could Mean Rove Cut A Deal
Remember all those stories about visits to Rove's attorney? That's one way to avoid an indictment, after all.

One key seems to be whether a new grand jury gets empaneled or not. If that happens, then Rove NOT being indicted is even better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #70
72. What kind of deal could Rove have cut? I think he may escape indictment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HR_Pufnstuf Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
74. I thought there were going to be 22 indictments.
According to Larry Johnson's lunch partner was it?

lol. madnesss.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
75. Rove is bargaining....
This could get very interesting. But if Rove is bargaining, I hope Fitzgerald has his balls thoroughly in the crusher, because Rove is a devious POS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
76. (AP) White House Fears Indictment for Libby


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051028/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/cia_leak_investigation;_ylt=Av9sqsnKph1W8daTvWLxBuWs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA2Z2szazkxBHNlYwN0bQ--
White House Fears Indictment for Libby

By PETE YOST and JOHN SOLOMON, Associated Press Writers 22 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - Working against the clock, Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald weighed criminal charges against top presidential aides at the end of a two-year investigation that put the White House in a state of high suspense Thursday night.

Fitzgerald raced against a Friday expiration of the grand jury that has been investigating the exposure of covert
CIA officer Valerie Plame's identity. Speculation flew across Washington about who would be indicted, or whether Fitzgerald would even bring criminal charges.

White House colleagues feared Vice President
Dick Cheney's chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, would be indicted Friday for at least false statements but held out hope that presidential political adviser Karl Rove might escape criminal charges for the time being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #76
77. similar to NYTimes story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #77
78. very sim. to Times.--Rove spared tomorrow --but not in the future.


A person outside the legal profession familiar with recent developments in the case said Thursday night that Rove's team does not believe he is out of legal jeopardy yet but likely would be spared bad news Friday when the White House fears the first indictments will be issued.

Fitzgerald signaled Thursday he might keep Rove under continuing investigation, sparing him from immediate charges, the person said, speaking only on condition of anonymity because of the secrecy of the grand jury probe.

Both Rove and Libby put in their normal long work day at the White House on Thursday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #76
79. I think Rove will resign, even if not indicted. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #79
84. From your mouth to God's ear. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #76
80. AND ROVE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #76
81. Reuters has a similar story...they almost certainly got it from NYT. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #81
82. A media person once told me there are only four sources
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 10:59 PM by Pacifist Patriot
for breaking print news. AP, Reuters, Washington Post and the New York Times..with the others grabbing it quickly if it's not a simultaneous break. Everything else is derivative. I don't know if that's true but more often than not it sure looks like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #82
83. Since they all seem to be materializing within an hour or so of the NYT
piece, I assume that they're just "copycatting" each other at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WLKjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #76
85. FOX NEWS BREAKING!!!!!!!!
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 11:00 PM by WLKjr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #85
86. I can't imagine why they would be the first to know.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #86
88. He probably leaked them a copy of his 'target' letter from Fitz ...
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #85
87. Shocked!
Shocked I say!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #85
89. Wherever did that get that idea?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #85
90. It's not a Fox report. . .it's an AP report they posted on their site.
They can't even do their own reporting. It's a wonder anyone takes Fox seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #85
91. "to be" are the important words here. No story yet.
Someone may be indicted!!!!!!!!!!!! stay tuned!!!!!!!!!!!!!

nothing yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #85
92. Fabulous - we have Faux "News" reports on DU
:eyes:

Makes me sick to my stomach - they are a Nazi propaganda machine and we promote them :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WLKjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #92
94. GOOGLE has multiple sites reporting the same
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #94
96. Right. So what's the headline on DU? "FOX NEWS BREAKING"
Makes me sick to my stomach. Heil Hitler!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WLKjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #96
97. damn, I'm sorry
I have about 5 different sites up now, and that was the first I saw a banner on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #85
93. Fox ? ....
WTF is Fox ? ....

NEVER go there .... ever ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WLKjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #93
98. read my reply to Mr_Spock
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #98
102. Yeah ..... I repeat .....
NEVER go to Fox .... ever ....

There are SO many valid sources, and life is so short: how can I justify spending even a moment there ? ...

NAY ! .. I shant ......

I will await REAL news from somewhere else, and reject that Fox even exists ...... Life is too damned short .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WLKjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #102
105. I didn't necessarily believe it at first, but
I posted it up and went and googled it to see if anyone else was doing it too, and google had a few different sites, second one I saw was some science site that had it up not long after fox did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #85
95. Looks like Libby is VERY EXPENDABLE!!!
but the Brain is not!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Judged Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #85
101. Rove's attorney leaks, Fitzgerald knows it, and it's OK?
"Fitzgerald signaled Thursday he might keep Rove under continuing investigation, sparing him from immediate charges, the person said, speaking only on condition of anonymity because of the secrecy of the grand jury probe."

How can Fitzgerald profit from allowing Rove's attorney to play spin the bottle with the media?

Please explain that to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #85
103. Holly damn cow...I'm having one! teeehehehehehehhe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HR_Pufnstuf Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #85
106. It's too late. Fox is already broke.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #76
99. For the time being HA HA HA!!! Rove is not indicted but what
will Bush do then HA HA HA!!! Make the decision keep him or have him resign!!!

Now Bush can't sit there and say I don't know now he does and if there is ANY question of Rove involvement he should fire him... I love this let Bush be in the HOT SEAT HA HA HA!!! Fitz is Brilliant!!!

Libby is dead meat and expendable!!! Cheney lost his legg man and is castrated!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #76
100. I can't wait for the Plame suit too. This ain't going away like they're
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 11:28 PM by kikiek
fantasizing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #76
104. Libby's canned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ignatzmouse Donating Member (327 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
107. Fitzgerald may simply be satisfying the Grand Jury to a tee
Remember that the Rove machine has many friends who may or may not include Grand Jury members, but it will certainly extend to influential friends of Grand Jury members.

The hurdle must be very high -- witness the last minute scrambling with interviews of Plame neighbors. I have the sense that there is some resistance coming from the jurors. By reports, Fitzgerald is to keep Rove's participation under further investigation. It simply means that he is working diligently to meet the Grand Jury requirements. He doesn't want his work to get shot down. Give him some slack and see what he comes up with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #107
112. Sorry...not in DC
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 01:12 AM by jaysunb
That GJ is probably heavily African American, and we don't play in the bushes !!:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Singular73 Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
108. Bullshit
They are trying to lower expectations, after having raised them too high.

Watch what happens tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
110. I'll ask the same thing here that I've asked in two other threads...
If Fitz's investigations are known for their secrecy, why oh why would Fitz send out target letters/make calls informing these people of his genuine intentions? He would have to know that any calls he made or letters that he sent would be immediately leaked. The man has no history of leaking any information to the press (in fact, it's quite the opposite). Why would he do any different with this case?

It doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaded_at_best Donating Member (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
111. WHITEWASH
pure and simple. If all we get is a perjury indictment against Scooter, Fitzgerald is the one who needs to be investigated.

What else would you expect from someone appointed by John Ashkkkroft?

I've been saying all along that it is in the bag for the Bush Crime Family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeoConsSuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #111
118. I agree.
As Ozymandius points out in his stock market thread every day:

Number of Enron Execs in handcuffs = 19
ENRON EXECS CONVICTED = 2

This is going to be the same deal. If you think anyone involved in this will ever spend a day in jail, I have a bridge in downstate NY I would like to sell ya.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antonialee839 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
113. How does one indict Libby and not "she's fair game" Rove?
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 01:29 AM by antonialee839
If this front running weasel is not indicted along with Libby,
then there is no justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boddhi Donating Member (92 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
114. Libby is the fall guy
it's been my fear for quite some time that the choice had been made and the cabal had two years to work out the story. The cabal knew it was likely that somebody might have to take the hit so Libby got the short straw. He'll be publicly embarrassed and get a fat consulting job with Halliburton in six months. The public doesn't know who Libby is and it'll have the least impact on the administration. It's why what's-her-face got out of jail - she was permitted out because they'd decided that they weren't going to get out of it without somebody taking the fall, so she came out and ratted Libby.

Somebody please wake me from this Nightmare Before Fitzmas...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antonialee839 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #114
115. Hopefully Libby is feeling like some company and dimes out the entire
cesspool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
116. The bad news is that this is what Libby predicted to Miller...
in his cryptographic paragraph about the "aspens," if I parsed it correctly (a very big if), and if it was truly intended for Miller. In the non-cryptographic part, he tells her many times that he now wants her to testify, and that he always did (blarney). He is taking the "fall" for the others, but the "aspens" that turn "in clusters" in the fall "because their roots are connected" are still in place and the Mideast war goes on and expands (i.e., the persons and covert 'dirty tricks' capabilities they've worked on, to keep the US in the Mideast and expand the war are all still at work, protected by my taking the fall), and she should "come back to work--and life" to cover the war with Iran and "biological threats." (He also mentions the Iraqi elections.)

Truly a downer. May be Libby wishful thinking. And it took A LOT of parsing to dig out this meaning.

The good news: There are numerous indications that Fitzgerald is expanding his investigation (new breaks in the case, new info, new offices, new internet site, meeting with the judge, rumors of cont'd grand jury or new grand jury, strong hints of relationship to AIPAC/Franklin case, and a couple of other recent news reports), with possible targets being Cheney and (I dearly hope) Rumsfeld (--don't know about Jr).

If there is only one indictment this week, I'd bet money, at this point, on a grand jury extension or new grand jury, and more indictments to come.

This is not over. The rats may have their ratty "clustering" fall guy game plan, but that doesn't mean it's going to work, and I think they are really running scared.

The AIPAC/Franklin case is a Pandora's Box of legal jeopardy for the whole Bush regime, of which Plamegate is just a part. The END of it was their outing of Plame; the beginning of it was the commissioning of the Niger forgeries, and whatever else they may have been cooking up at that Rome meeting, or within the WHIG, or at the OSP. And Plamegate itself by no means stops with Libby. It was a conspiracy, and may even involve the deaths of covert CIA agents--a hanging offense.

Also, the political climate--including both the real one and the illusory one created by the war profiteering corporate news monopolies--is very much against them. And, in the end, I think we're going to get at least a Cheney resignation, so the Republican elite can try to clear the air and get their new boy (or girl) in as VP before the '08 elections (or '06).

The Republicans are currently rudderless--Frist, Delay, Bush, all in big trouble--not that they need to have competence, experience, professionalism and intelligence running things, but they need to give the appearance of it (--that is, a barrage of fascist initiatives spearheaded by their henchmen, and some sort of sellable figurehead--Jr.'s brand is fast losing market share.)

Nothing fundamental is going to change, of course, until we throw Diebold and ES&S election theft machines into 'Boston Harbor.' But the threat to life and limb that the neocon cabal poses to us and to the world will be significantly mitigated by Cheney not having his hands on the reins and covert capabilities of gov't.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiabrill Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
119. I'd be disappointed with watered down indictment....
Both Libby and Rove should be indicted. The continuation of the investigation is supposed to net Cheney.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muchacho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
120. Damn!
I was looking forward to bagging the big buck (treasonous fat boy).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moosepoop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
121. The NYT article is full of speculation, not facts.
Boiled down, it's almost all assumptions based on assertions.

"Lawyers said" "they expected" Libby to be indicted.
"People said" Rove wouldn't be indicted yet, then "they said" that "as a result" of that assertion, "Fitzgerald was likely" to extend the term of the GJ.
WH officals said that "their presumption was" that Libby would resign if indicted.
Fitzgerald "is expected" to give a news conference today, yet his spokesman wouldn't say so.

There are also disclaimers:

As rumors coursed through the capital, Mr. Fitzgerald gave no public signal of how he intended to proceed, further intensifying the anxiety that has gripped the White House and left partisans on both sides of the political aisle holding their breath.

Mr. Fitzgerald's preparations for a Friday announcement were shrouded in secrecy, but advanced amid a flurry of behind-the-scenes discussions that left open the possibility of last-minute surprises. As the clock ticked down on the grand jury, people involved in the investigation did not rule out the disclosure of previously unknown aspects of the case.


I think the NYT knows about as much as we do, they just packaged their best educated guesses in a way that makes them sound like they're more knowledgeable than they are.

But I'm just guessing.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fluffdaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:16 AM
Response to Reply #121
122. True.......... no "news" here. just more wasted trees
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC