|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Syrinx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:20 PM Original message |
NY Times: Aide to Cheney Appears Likely to Be Indicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
1. FITZMAS EVE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
2. Good! But we want Rove! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnfunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:48 PM Response to Reply #2 |
41. The NY Times was wrong about Iraq WMDs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brooklynite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 10:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
58. Um, doesn't W get permission to go to the bathroom from Condi? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
3. If Rove is not charged then he has flipped on somebody |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
speedoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:27 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Rove... ".. will remain under investigation". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Elidor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:52 PM Response to Reply #5 |
47. I think the extra time is to squeeze Rove for all he's worth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeunderdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 06:17 AM Response to Reply #47 |
123. Mixed blessing for the WH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 10:31 PM Response to Reply #3 |
57. Fitzgerald paid a visit to Luskin late Wednesday, I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gordianot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 10:49 PM Response to Reply #3 |
63. A possibility. He may be doing a Novak. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Miss Chybil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 11:17 PM Response to Reply #63 |
71. What the hell happened to Novak, anyway? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gordianot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 07:43 AM Response to Reply #71 |
125. He most probably cooperated. Who knows? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadparrot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
4. What does being briefed "officially" entail? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. I bet someone from Fitz's office was told to make a courtesy call |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Halliburton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #4 |
29. luskin has been associated with that moniker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 06:20 AM Response to Reply #4 |
124. Libby probably got a letter telling him he would be indicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DubyaSux (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
7. Rove Not To Be Charged... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:28 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Is this true? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kikiek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:28 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. If true the jury was going to be extended and Rove still under |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Elidor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:55 PM Response to Reply #9 |
48. Yes, for Rove it is the death of a thousand cuts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrat in Tallahassee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:28 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. at least not tomorrow, but it goes on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savemefromdumbya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:28 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. So Rove is the rat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Hold it. Read the article! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gloria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. I was told by someone who spoke with const. lawyers that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:44 PM Response to Reply #19 |
37. Yes he can, he has to go to a judge to get authority this time, though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FVZA_Colonel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #12 |
25. It did say "likely to extend"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 11:00 PM Response to Reply #25 |
67. Why would he take more office space if not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnfunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:49 PM Response to Reply #12 |
44. He could well be ratting the WHIOGs out! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Sludge says the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indie_voter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. MHO, I don't think it's anti-climatic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dagaz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 10:09 PM Response to Reply #14 |
55. Sure for another 3 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ItsTheMediaStupid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. Has KKKarl flipped on Bush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 11:01 PM Response to Reply #15 |
68. He'd never give up his prince. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cassiepriam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 03:42 AM Response to Reply #15 |
117. Rove would sell his own mother for a dime, but not Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 08:16 PM Response to Reply #117 |
126. Yes, until at some point Piggy smells his own flesh on the spit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cassiepriam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 04:49 AM Response to Reply #126 |
127. That is true. But Rove always has tons of dirty tricks up his sleeve |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. i'm waiting for Fitzgerald to say it before i take it as gospel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
17. turned state's evidence in exchange for immunity? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freedom_from_Chains (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 10:03 PM Response to Reply #17 |
53. That's what I was thinking was what his attorney's negotiation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
clydefrand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. If this is from the NYT, why isn't it on their website? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sgent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
20. Rumor says |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
21. Deserves a DU 4 paragraph snip - NYT: Aide to Cheney Appears Likely to Be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bigleaf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
22. Rove is the one I wanted the most. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alizaryn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
23. Yuck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kikiek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
24. What is that I smell....oh desperation...common odor these days. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
26. This line right here speaks volumes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Giant Robot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
27. Ignore if you don't like foul language |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
28. I Call BULLSHIT Until I Hear From Fitz |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ninkasi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 10:51 PM Response to Reply #28 |
64. Rove is only next to Bush and Cheney for me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barb162 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:39 PM Response to Reply #7 |
33. Yeah, I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:39 PM Response to Reply #7 |
34. not true, the investigation is being extended |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bitchkitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 10:35 PM Response to Reply #7 |
59. It says he won't be charged along with Libby on Friday - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
30. The NYT is not about to mess up again--not at this point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike_The_Computer (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
31. Safe to say, Rove did whatever he had to do to stay out of jail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:47 PM Response to Reply #31 |
40. Like maybe rat out LIBBY? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
32. if it is going to be extended that is extremely important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:45 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. YES, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
35. so, the whole country has to wait on Rove. Damn! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
longship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
36. Yes, and the NYTimes is such a *reliable* source. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:46 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. WH will be in a long drawn out legal proceeding!!-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:48 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. neither lawyer is talking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
longship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:48 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. My comment was not on this article, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:50 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. aaron brown and David Gergan talking now. cnn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:51 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. Gergan said a new grand jury would be be assembled. this will be LONG |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kikiek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 10:05 PM Response to Reply #46 |
54. Good that could only mean they are going deep. This deserves nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DLnyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
49. Point to consider: If Rove avoided indictment by ratting out people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wookie294 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:58 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. If the choice is indicting Rove or Cheney, I'd pick Cheney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adigal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
51. Sounds like rove is bargaining |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CityDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
52. This sucks (if true) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
56. Charge Rove, Dammit!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seriousstan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
60. LIBBY??? The guy was unknown until a few months ago! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Independent_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
61. One way or another, Rove is definitely in a heap of trouble. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
62. Don't worry, I think Rove will resign, even if not indicted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
65. Its my understanding that Fitzgerald and Luskin have had past |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 11:39 PM Response to Reply #65 |
73. Help--who's Luskin? --nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
66. Well, someone on DU asked for predictions the other night. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaysunb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 01:07 AM Response to Reply #66 |
109. you did, didn't you..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 11:13 PM Response to Original message |
69. Losing Scooter is like castrating Cheney!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edgewater_Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 11:16 PM Response to Original message |
70. It Could Mean Rove Cut A Deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pryderi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 11:29 PM Response to Reply #70 |
72. What kind of deal could Rove have cut? I think he may escape indictment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HR_Pufnstuf (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 11:47 PM Response to Original message |
74. I thought there were going to be 22 indictments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
75. Rove is bargaining.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
76. (AP) White House Fears Indictment for Libby |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM Response to Reply #76 |
77. similar to NYTimes story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM Response to Reply #77 |
78. very sim. to Times.--Rove spared tomorrow --but not in the future. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM Response to Reply #76 |
79. I think Rove will resign, even if not indicted. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM Response to Reply #79 |
84. From your mouth to God's ear. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM Response to Reply #76 |
80. AND ROVE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadparrot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM Response to Reply #76 |
81. Reuters has a similar story...they almost certainly got it from NYT. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM Response to Reply #81 |
82. A media person once told me there are only four sources |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadparrot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM Response to Reply #82 |
83. Since they all seem to be materializing within an hour or so of the NYT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WLKjr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM Response to Reply #76 |
85. FOX NEWS BREAKING!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM Response to Reply #85 |
86. I can't imagine why they would be the first to know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hippiechick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM Response to Reply #86 |
88. He probably leaked them a copy of his 'target' letter from Fitz ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShockediSay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM Response to Reply #85 |
87. Shocked! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadparrot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM Response to Reply #85 |
89. Wherever did that get that idea? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM Response to Reply #85 |
90. It's not a Fox report. . .it's an AP report they posted on their site. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM Response to Reply #85 |
91. "to be" are the important words here. No story yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr_Spock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM Response to Reply #85 |
92. Fabulous - we have Faux "News" reports on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WLKjr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM Response to Reply #92 |
94. GOOGLE has multiple sites reporting the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr_Spock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM Response to Reply #94 |
96. Right. So what's the headline on DU? "FOX NEWS BREAKING" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WLKjr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM Response to Reply #96 |
97. damn, I'm sorry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trajan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM Response to Reply #85 |
93. Fox ? .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WLKjr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM Response to Reply #93 |
98. read my reply to Mr_Spock |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trajan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:13 AM Response to Reply #98 |
102. Yeah ..... I repeat ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WLKjr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:13 AM Response to Reply #102 |
105. I didn't necessarily believe it at first, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:12 AM Response to Reply #85 |
95. Looks like Libby is VERY EXPENDABLE!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Judged (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:13 AM Response to Reply #85 |
101. Rove's attorney leaks, Fitzgerald knows it, and it's OK? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:13 AM Response to Reply #85 |
103. Holly damn cow...I'm having one! teeehehehehehehhe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HR_Pufnstuf (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:13 AM Response to Reply #85 |
106. It's too late. Fox is already broke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:13 AM Response to Reply #76 |
99. For the time being HA HA HA!!! Rove is not indicted but what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kikiek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:13 AM Response to Reply #76 |
100. I can't wait for the Plame suit too. This ain't going away like they're |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoddessOfGuinness (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:13 AM Response to Reply #76 |
104. Libby's canned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ignatzmouse (327 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
107. Fitzgerald may simply be satisfying the Grand Jury to a tee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaysunb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 01:11 AM Response to Reply #107 |
112. Sorry...not in DC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Singular73 (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:46 AM Response to Original message |
108. Bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadparrot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 01:11 AM Response to Original message |
110. I'll ask the same thing here that I've asked in two other threads... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaded_at_best (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 01:11 AM Response to Original message |
111. WHITEWASH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NeoConsSuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:09 AM Response to Reply #111 |
118. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antonialee839 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 01:27 AM Response to Original message |
113. How does one indict Libby and not "she's fair game" Rove? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boddhi (92 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 01:29 AM Response to Original message |
114. Libby is the fall guy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antonialee839 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 01:30 AM Response to Reply #114 |
115. Hopefully Libby is feeling like some company and dimes out the entire |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peace Patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 01:53 AM Response to Original message |
116. The bad news is that this is what Libby predicted to Miller... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiabrill (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:19 AM Response to Original message |
119. I'd be disappointed with watered down indictment.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muchacho (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:32 AM Response to Original message |
120. Damn! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moosepoop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 06:06 AM Response to Original message |
121. The NYT article is full of speculation, not facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fluffdaddy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 06:16 AM Response to Reply #121 |
122. True.......... no "news" here. just more wasted trees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 04:44 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC