Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Rove's Future Role Is Debated, White House May Seek Fresh Start...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:15 AM
Original message
WP: Rove's Future Role Is Debated, White House May Seek Fresh Start...
Edited on Thu Nov-03-05 12:17 AM by Rose Siding
White House May Seek Fresh Start In Wake of Leak

By Jim VandeHei and Carol D. Leonnig
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, November 3, 2005; Page A01

Top White House aides are privately discussing the future of Karl Rove, with some expressing doubt that President Bush can move beyond the damaging CIA leak case as long as his closest political strategist remains in the administration.

If Rove stays, which colleagues say remains his intention, he may at a minimum have to issue a formal apology for misleading colleagues and the public about his role in conversations that led to the unmasking of CIA operative Valerie Plame, according to senior Republican sources familiar with White House deliberations.

While Rove faces doubts about his White House status, there are new indications that he remains in legal jeopardy from Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald's criminal investigation of the Plame leak. The prosecutor spoke this week with an attorney for Time magazine reporter Matthew Cooper about his client's conversations with Rove before and after Plame's identity became publicly known because of anonymous disclosures by White House officials, according to two sources familiar with the conversation.

Fitzgerald is considering charging Rove with making false statements in the course of the 22-month probe, and sources close to Rove -- who holds the titles of senior adviser and White House deputy chief of staff -- said they expect to know within weeks whether the most powerful aide in the White House will be accused of a crime.

But some top Republicans said yesterday that Rove's problems may not end there........

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/02/AR2005110203276.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. I am positively ablaze with schadenfreude.
Poor, poor KKKarl. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. What does that word mean again? nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opiate69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Basically it means..
taking extreme pleasure in your enemy's downfall..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Child_Of_Isis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. You are bad.
But, I like you.:applause: :applause: :applause: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opiate69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
24. hehe
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Taking pleasure in the misfortune of others.
I will experience great glee if KKKarl goes down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Child_Of_Isis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. You are bad also.
:applause: :applause: :applause: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugar Smack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
40. Then so am I. LOL!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. "Issue" an apology? If jail is not where he's headed, I want a televised
SPEECH. Make him crawl out from the dark corner and shine the light on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. An "apology"?? Rove is a thick-skinned pig
who is completely immune to either shame or contrition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. This indicates that the e-mail to Levine was what BUSTED him,
not what gave Fitz "pause" in charging him, as Rove's lawyer has been spinning it.

Sources close to Rove say one pressing problem for him is that he initially did not tell investigators he had a conversation with Cooper, then he produced an e-mail to a colleague in which he reported he had spoken to Cooper. He told the grand jury he could recollect very little of the conversation other than a discussion of welfare, sources said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #11
20. Does that refer to an e-mail that came to light earlier, Rose?
Edited on Thu Nov-03-05 12:38 AM by DeepModem Mom
I thought the purpose of producing the last-minute e-mail was that it contained no reference to Plame, supposedly proving that Rove wasn't totally engaged in his effort to out Plame -- which seemed really lame to all of us when you, I think, posted about it.

But could be my memory is as foggy as Rove's, and I'm too sleepy to google!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #20
32. That's how "lawyers familiar with the case" spun it to the LAT
snip>
As recently as Tuesday, for example, prosecutors began to focus on a 2003 e-mail exchange between Rove and a White House colleague. The exchange could be seen as supporting Rove's contention that he had not intentionally misled investigators.....

Levine told investigators that Rove had not brought up Plame or the Cooper conversation — suggesting that the topics were not priorities for Rove at the time.

"Levine's acknowledgment that the Cooper conversation did not come up in my client's conversation with Rove seems to support a theory that it just wasn't that important to Rove and could therefore have been easily forgotten," said Daniel French, Levine's attorney.

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/la-na-rove29oct29,1,3022936.story

But this article is giving it a different role.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #32
41. I see -- thanks! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
54. Rover remembers he talked to Cooper about welfare, but can't recall
any conversation about the CIA leak/Plame. Oh, Karl, you're always so concerned about the poor, thank you for speaking with Cooper about welfare because we know what a staunch advocate of the poor you are.
NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
73. Even Nixon said his biggest mistake was not apologizing, if he did
the american people would have accepted it -- but not lying to the bitter end ---dumb fu*k...just like Rove -- I hope Rove makes no apologies although in his case he's still history, just a matter of a few more weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. Oooo, they're admitting to staff tension, ticked off about
Rove lying to McClellan. And they are worried that unless something's done, Rove will be a liability in 06. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
10. But what will Bush do if his brain is removed
We have to face the fact that W is a joke. A total joke. So what do we do when we realize the Right Wing has engineered a total joke as the President? A sad time for our country,indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Einstein99 Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
70. Puppet strings
With Libby gone, if Rove leaves the White House, who will be left to pull Bush's puppet strings? Cheney? Rice? Rumsfeld?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
12. Wow! Two things -- one, who's leaking this disaffection to the WP? Two...
if we thought Frist blew a gasket yesterday, imagine Shrub having to let go of Rove. He knows he's Rove's creation, and very little more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forintegrity Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Wrong.
Edited on Thu Nov-03-05 12:28 AM by forintegrity
He doesn't have a clue he's Rove's creation cuz he's too stupid to know anything. He probably thinks he's God's answer to America and knows that cuz God told him so!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. Except Rove can still be a CONsultant
Somehow, if Rove's going to be involved I'd rather have him in a position that Congress can call him on the carpet for.

Mind you, I want Rove gone also. Along with Karen Hughes and all of the other marketeers that brought this abomination upon us. But we need to be mindful that Rove can be put on a contract in much the same way as Michael Brown was, only with an ending date of January 2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Right -- unless my dream comes true, and Rove's behind bars! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Ah....
that's not a dream...it's an oragasm!!! LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forintegrity Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
13. "Fresh Start"? Too late for that...
ain't gonna happen. They're too fat gone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
14. i think i gone through a ream of paper just printing out stuff from
Jim VandeHei. I love this stuff!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shockingelk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
16. Give them Bob Shrum!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
17. Polls at 35% and less is hitting below the belt , eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
18. Heads up, people!!!
Many are calling for Bush to get "fresh blood". They are saying he needs "fresh blood" and that the jobs in the WH are burn outs. Also, if he is to get his Presidency back on tracy for his legacy that he needs "fresh blood".

So, while I'll be celebrating the day Rove and the rest of them are out of (direct) policy making with this WH, I give no pass to Bush that he's turned the corner or anything of the sort. It's all about HIM...NOT THIS COUNTRY!!! If it were about this country he would have admitted mistakes and taken a change in course a LONG time ago!

I'm just saying that getting Rove out is like trying to pull the flower off a dandelion then expecting the weed problem to be gone. The root of the problem is much deeper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
62. Fresh Blood!!!!??
Does that mean we will be attacked again as a diversion from this scandal and Bush's downward spiral in the polls?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
19. You know the White House is floating this to the media due to indictment.
Impending indictment. Serious indictment. I now think that * will fire Rove based on these "reports." Clearly they want him to be a former White House aid when the indictment comes...and based on these reports, I believe that will happen next week. Just my gut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Halliburton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. I thought Rove was in the clear
according to Ishikoff, David Brooks, Tom Brokaw, Johnothan Alter, Jeffrety Toobin, and others. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lavendermist Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. From your mouth to God's ear.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. I agree with your gut.
I give it a couple of weeks though.

Rover made false statements to the GJ. That much is obvious from FOUR GJ appearances... one at the VERY LAST MINUTE.

It would be great karma, however, for Rover to think he beat the rap and was in the clear - only to have Fitz indict him at a later date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #27
35. My gut also says Cheney is gone by January.
For health reasons, of course. Or was it to spend more time with his family? Or is it because his nanny is an illegal immigrant?

Oh well, he's next to go following Rove.

I feel it. I know it. The law is on our side. Truth and justice will prevail. Despite what they've done, this is still America after all. History will set itself straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #19
29. Whoa -- could be! Starting to distance themselves. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gelliebeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #19
37. That was my first thought too.
Chimpy and the gang don't want stinky Rove in the white house when he is indicted. Media will be replaying pictures of Rove leaving the WH for the last time like we did last Friday with Libby and that couldn't of made old "unka dick" happy. You are exactly right that it sounds better that Rove is an former white house aid. Either way as long as the bastard is implicated, I'm not going to be picky on how his goose finally gets cooked :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #19
38. I agree, things are looking bad for dear ol' Karl
and the WH is trying to figure out how to make a silk purse out of a a sow's ear.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
47. * must be considering dumping Rove.
With his approval ratings firmly lodged in the subterranean plumbing, he must be flailing about for anything to try that will make him look decisive. Having to get rid of a close adviser will be embarrassing, but if it could be spun to a net gain, it's already on the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. He HAS to dump him as a close advisor, because his security clearance
is now ILLEGAL. I've posted on this downthread. The law on this is CLEAR - and without a security clearance, Rove can't see much of anything the President is dealing with.

So far as I know, they haven't yet revoked his security clearance and it's not clear that they will do so without being forced. I wonder if Bush will try to get out of this by rescinding the executive order that covers this situation - he's desperate for Rove, but such a step would be very unpopular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #49
61. I don't doubt that that's true...
...but unless someone is able and willing to enforce the law, no, * doesn't have to fire anyone.

We should continue to make it politically untenable, at least, and should encourage the authorities to enforce the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. Yep, and they are warming the public to the idea that Rove will be fired.
Slowly leaking that * is considering the change as if he is a strong leader, when it sounds to me like Rove himself may be laying the groundwork for his departure. On the way out the door he may be trying to prop * up one last time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
22. Rove is in a postition he may not be able to give advice to Bush soon
Should the shit hit the fan.....

This will be a good thing for America...

Roves advice has not helped America one fuckin iota...it been all bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #22
55. not that advice from ANY neoCON will make the country better
Edited on Thu Nov-03-05 03:09 PM by wordpix
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
30. Rove is indeed now "an unindicted co-conspirator."
"White House colleagues say Rove is clearly "Official A," based on the detailed description.

That kind of pseudonym is often used by prosecutors to refer to an unindicted co-conspirator, or someone who faces the prospect of being charged. No other administration official is identified in this way in Fitzgerald's indictment"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
31. No, this isn't over yet.
It's great to see them putting this in print. Rove, you've lost your magical powers over the media. No amount of BS faxes and reporters in your pocket are going to save you now.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calmblueocean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
33. What is this "Fresh Start" crap?
This is politics, boys. You don't get "do overs".

As Aristotle once wrote, "Suck it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #33
56. Fresh doo-doo and old shit from BushCo will be the same
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
34. What's a guy gotta do to get a security clearance yanked?
I would think abusing the clearance by exposing secret information would get you off the secure list. If it is known that he leaked, why does he still have a security clearance. It is a privilege, not a right. He is a security risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #34
45. Absolutely true - I've posted below (reply # 44) on this. It's ILLEGAL
Edited on Thu Nov-03-05 01:12 PM by Nothing Without Hope
for Rove to have a security clearance now. There's a DU thread, currently on the Home Page, on the Newsweek article that discusses the law:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5245705
thread title (11/2): Newsweek: Is Rove a Security Risk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #34
57. right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
36. how absolutely delicious. can someone pass the salt?
and pepper?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #36
63. or, it stinks. Will someone pass the plastic bag to
clean up the doodoo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shantipriya Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
39. Rove
Book him,Pat.The SOB deserves much more than that for electing a dimwit and a buffoon as the President .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #39
65. you mean, "selecting" the dangerous moron as prezident
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
42. Fire him, bushie, and another one. Just like Nixon did before
all hell broke loose. Hahahahaha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
43. The fish rots from the head: excising a small tumor won't stop a rampantly
spreading cancer eating the whole body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
44. WH shows both an ethical & strategic divide and ignorance of law
Edited on Thu Nov-03-05 01:13 PM by Nothing Without Hope
I've posted on this in reply to a dupe DU thread on the same WaPo article (http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5250933). I also posted a long diary entry on it at dKos:
http://www.dailykos.com/hotlist/add/2005/11/3/11396/9908/displaystory//Diary
title: Ethical and strategic divides on Rove's status obvious in front Page 11/3 WaPo article

The WH clearly has no clue that they really can't keep Karl around. Some of them still think a Rove apology is enough to fix everything! There is no indication that they realize, let alone admit, that what he did was wrong. And of course, Bush wants his Svengali around to pull the strings and keep him safe.

In fact, according to Executive Order 12958, signed by President Clinton in 1995, Rove's security clearance should be revoked. This is explained in an online-only Newsweek article dated 11/2: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9899512/site/newsweek. And of course, without a security clearance there's not much Uncle Karl could still do around the WH. It's not clear whether anyone has actually dared to explain this yet to Bush. He's had a bad week and is likely snappish.

There's a DU thread, currently on the Home Page, on the Newsweek article that discusses the active executive order that makes Karl ROve's security clearance ILLEGAL:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5245705
thread title (11/2): Newsweek: Is Rove a Security Risk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
46. Just to be sure you all know - Rove's security clearance is now ILLEGAL
Not that the WH has admitted this, but the law is clear. It's an active executive order signed by Clinton and it's all spelled out. Rove's situation clearly fits in the category where security clearance MUST BE REVOKED. And without security clearance, Rove's usefulness to Bush is limited.

A Newsweek online-only article explaining this law - Executive Order 12958 - is currently cited in a thread on the DU home page.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5245705
thread title (11/2): Newsweek: Is Rove a Security Risk?

How long until the WH is forced to obey this law? Or can Bush rescind it? If he did, it would surely not go over well, but he is desperate for Rove's "help":

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
48. BTW - an earlier thread on this same Wash Post article is also on the
Greatest page:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5250933
thread title (11/3): BREAKING: FITZ STILL INVESTIGATING ROVE, AIDES DISCUSSING KARL'S FUTURE

Too bad it's broken up, but it's nobody's fault - the two threads were posted within minutes of one another, so both were being composed at the same time. I note the other thread here because both threads on this WaPo article have good discussion.

I also posted on this article at dKos:
http://www.dailykos.com/hotlist/add/2005/11/3/11396/9908/displaystory//Diary
title (11/3): Ethical and strategic divides on Rove's status obvious in front Page 11/3 WaPo article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
51. Fire rover before new year, on or prefer before his b-day,Dec 25
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
52. it's outrageous that Karl Rove the Traitor remains in high gov. position
Fire the SOB. Then move on to impeach BushCo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
53. A DO OVER? You want a DO OVER? There's no DO OVERS in politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elsiesummers Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
58. If Rove is fired, who will run the country? Seriously...
W is nothing more than a cardboard cutout marketing tool akin to those found in grocery store aisles. Rove is in fact "Bush's Brain," and although clearly unethical, he is the only one with gears that turn. Andy Card (aka the scarecrow) is perhaps dumber than Bush.

Colin Powell left long ago. Likewise, Ari Fleisher left and spywitnesses last saw him, glazed expression, fondling Target wedding gifts while mumbling "shiny plastic". Rumsfeld is too preoccupied with overseeing the torture of "furners" overseas to turn attention to the good ol' US of A. Karen Hughes is travelling incognito in the folds of a high volume burka.

Cheney is residing at the core of the earth and only reachable by Bunker Buster. Tests prove Condi Rice is actually a bobble head doll.

At this point, Prez Denny Hastert would be a welcome relief, because it looks like the Bush Admin is about to encounter a strange sort of rapture where no one with an IQ above 90 will be left behind.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #58
64. Dems will run the country---we will IMPEACH all of BushCo asap and
let Hastert limp along with his lame duck legacy. Enter Dems winning in '08.

That scenario is possible only if Hastert doesn't get whacked with some illegal scandal of his own. He has BushCo taint on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
59. My prediction for Rover..
Edited on Thu Nov-03-05 02:34 PM by SoCalDem
He will announce in a very public way that he is resigning...because the media pressure and speculation is taking the focus from the excellent work the president is doing, and how hard he is working for the public.

He will hand pick his toady successor, and once out of the WH, he will gradually fade from the press coverage..

Without the laser beam of public interest focused on him, the rush for indictments will fade and he may never be charged with anything..

He will become yet another consultant and will be given a shill job at the Heritage Foundation or some other stink tank..

He will still do all the things he did for *² only now he will be a stealth-advisor..

Remember when Karen Hughes left with great fanfare..to spend more time with her family??..She still did all *²'s bidding, she was just out of sight..

This is the way these people work..they push right to the edge, and then pull back just in the nick of time...retreat a bit to regroup, and roar back later with a vengeance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
60. let's hope in a few weeks we can say Adios Rove
Joe Wilson was bashing him again last night on Keith Olbermann's show
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Child_Of_Isis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
66. Libby, whose friends have begun raising money for his legal defense fund
Is everything free for these guys? :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
67. More cowbell!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
68. "Karl's nuts roasting on an open fire..Libby's sucking on a hose...."
"Cheney's leak being sung by the choir and
George dressed Myers in judges robes, everybody

knows that Hadley forged the ye-llow-cake,
Tenet walked to save them all,
tiny lies added up to a war, so
Dubya's thir-ty five(%), today.

We know that Guckert/Gannon's gay,
he serviced lots of senate boys along the way, and every
time that Scotty lies, the GOP
knows that they're jobs are on the line...and

So we're celebrating sha-den-freud, to
hear the culprits finally pay
although it's been said, many times, many ways, Merry

Fitzmas, to you.

:popcorn:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #68
72. LMBAO...Now I like that song.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
69. Lead Story on MSNBC right now. Sounds bleak, for sure.
They're saying the groundwork for the crucifiction.

Let's see how the networks handle it tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
71. Yes...get rid of "BUSH BRAINS".
The WH will surely far apart then.:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC