Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill would push FDA on 'morning-after pill'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 06:59 PM
Original message
Bill would push FDA on 'morning-after pill'



http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20051103/hl_nm/pill_dc;_ylt=Ar5Ff5jitv6FJMktBqeknsOs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3czJjNGZoBHNlYwM3NTE-
Bill would push FDA on 'morning-after pill'

By Susan Heavey Thu Nov 3, 2:09 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Lawmakers frustrated with U.S. regulators' slow pace introduced a bill Thursday to force the
Food and Drug Administration to decide whether the "morning-after pill" can be sold without a prescription.

The measure says the Plan B pill, made by Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc., would be automatically be approved for over-the-counter sale 30 days after the bill's passage, until the agency makes a decision.

The bill's sponsors said the FDA had repeatedly refused to grant over-the-counter status for Plan B despite overwhelming scientific recommendations that it do so.

"Some of the FDA's own scientists have charged that politics, not science, is behind the FDA's actions," Democratic Reps. Carolyn Maloney and Joseph Crowley of New York, Jay Inslee of Washington, and Republican Rep. Christopher Shays (news, bio, voting record) of Connecticut said in a statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. well, it is past time to put an end to this stall game!


....It is unclear how much support the bill, sponsored by three Democrats and one Republican, will have in the Republican-led Congress.

Plan B is a set of two tablets containing higher doses of the hormone progestin used in birth control pills, and works by blocking the release or fertilization of an egg.

It is different from the "abortion pill"
RU-486, which blocks the hormone needed to keep a fertilized egg implanted in the uterus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wouldn't need to have many abortions

right.....

Sounds good to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. IF, and I repeat IF, it prevents the implantation of a
"fertilized egg baby" it IS abortion to them. Even plain old ordinary BC pills, which MAY do the same in some cases, are ABORTION to these extremists.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You are so right
just the off chance that a fertilized egg may be prevented from attaching to the uterus is enough for them to call it abortion. That's why they are against the regular birth control pill as well as abortion. I feel certain that after they overturn Roe v Wade, they'll be pushing to get rid of all these drugs too, claiming that they cause abortion, which would be illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Except for the abortions that their daughters and wives and
Edited on Thu Nov-03-05 07:54 PM by goclark
mistresses have --that is a different standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes, but they cannot explain that their 'god' does this with 67% of
fertilized egg babies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErisFiveFingers Donating Member (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. 67%?
I've heard other numbers, but it would be great to have a source for such a high number...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Here's one source....
Actually, the statistics are more grim than Pence admits. Only about 50% of all zygotes successfully implant in the uterine wall and become embryos. And only about 65% of all embryos lead to live births; the rest (about 35%) are lost to natural miscarriage. Therefore, slightly less than one third of all zygotes lead to live births. These statistics come from Gregg Easterbrook in "Abortion and Brain Waves" (2000) and from Morowitz and Trefil, The Facts of Life. Science and the Abortion Controversy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992). Easterbrook: only about 32.5% (65% of 50%) of all fertilized ovum are carried to term. Morowitz and Trefil: "slightly fewer than a third of all conceptions (72 percent of 45 percent) lead to a fetus that has a chance of developing." Morowitz and Trefil point out that not all fertilizations result in successful cell division -- some fertilized eggs don't even become blastocysts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hello. A pregnancy begins with implantation
of a fertilized egg in the uterus. That is the medical definition. Before that, it is a crapshoot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. Kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC