Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Groups Propose Alternative to E.P.A. Rules on Mercury

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 09:42 AM
Original message
NYT: Groups Propose Alternative to E.P.A. Rules on Mercury
Groups Propose Alternative to E.P.A. Rules on Mercury
By MICHAEL JANOFSKY
Published: November 14, 2005


WASHINGTON, Nov. 13 - Concerned that new federal standards on mercury emissions will not produce more immediate health benefits, two national groups of state and local air quality regulators have developed a plan to yield fewer emissions in less time.

The groups say at least 20 states have shown interest in the plan, which was conceived in response to complaints from environmentalists and some Democrats in Congress over federal rules to eliminate significant amounts of mercury from air and water.

Details of the plan are expected to be released Monday by the regulators' groups, the State and Territorial Air Pollution Program Administrators and the Association of Local Air Pollution Control Officials.

Coal-fired power plants in the United States emit about 48 tons of mercury a year, causing health risks that include developmental problems for fetuses and young children, largely through the consumption of fish. Currently, 45 states have fish advisories, warning their residents about mercury contamination in their waters.

In March, the Environmental Protection Agency announced the first federal rules to control mercury emissions from power plants. Until then, the plants had been exempt from federal standards for sources of toxic emissions. The rules require a 21 percent reduction in mercury emissions within five years - a level that would not require new controls - and a reduction of 70 percent by 2018....


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/14/politics/14mercury.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rfkrfk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. what are these lazy ass states waiting for? pass the laws
this should have been done years ago.
incompetant bums
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is one of the worst written articles ever
Edited on Mon Nov-14-05 10:58 AM by karynnj
What 2 national organizations? Who are the Democrats fighting on this and why can't the NYT include at their names? Isn't WHO the first of the basic things you should cover. I know Kerry (because he has mentioned the effort in speeches) and many NE Senators are part of the group, but I can't find a list.

Why haven't they passed it? Hint: We're the minority and they're in favor of the newregulations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. The Democrats who held their own hearing on this
Edited on Mon Nov-14-05 11:37 AM by karynnj
were Kerry who chaired a hearing on it. Jeffords, Leahy, Boxer, H Clinton, Dayton, Lautenberg, Feingold and Lieberman either participated or put in information

For links to the hearing and transcript:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=273&topic_id=51744&mesg_id=51745
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC