Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sunday Times: Security adviser named as source in CIA scandal (Hadley)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 07:06 PM
Original message
Sunday Times: Security adviser named as source in CIA scandal (Hadley)

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-1880016,00.html

Security adviser named as source in CIA scandal
Michael Smith and Sarah Baxter


THE mysterious source who gave America’s foremost journalist, Bob Woodward, a tip-off about the CIA agent at the centre of one of Washington’s biggest political storms was Stephen Hadley, the White House national security adviser, according to lawyers close to the investigation.

Woodward, the Washington Post reporter who broke the Watergate scandal that forced President Richard Nixon out of office, has refused publicly to divulge the name of his informant without permission, which has thus far been withheld.

...

“I’ve also seen press reports from White House officials saying that I am not one of his sources,” Hadley said with a smile. Asked if this was a yes or no he replied: “It is what it is.”

A White House official said the national security adviser’s ambiguity was unintentional and repeated that Hadley was not Woodward’s source. But others close to the investigation insisted that he was.



Another confirmation of RawStory's mid-week scoop...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. it is what it is?
what kind of a bullshit answer is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Boom Shakalaka.
Bush should fire him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. a "I know I'm guilty" answer...
peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Why point to WH press releases that he knew were not true? Was he
just being cocky or is there some scheme being played out? :shrug:

This whole thing doesn't pass the smell test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Exactly. This does not pass the smell test. What kind of answer was
that. He acts as if he does not give a damn about what the courts think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #13
29. He doesn't.
None of these guys have any regard for the law; it's all about getting what they want. Hadley's the guy who took the fall for not passing on Tenet's demand to take the nuclear references out of the SOUA in '03. (Gosh, sorry, guys; that piddly old nuclear stuff just musta slipped my mind...)

Some fall, huh? He's still there and still as powerful as ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. It depends on what "is" is.
Right wingers had a laugh over that line before, now they seem to have found some wisdom in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 07:21 PM
Original message
It all depends on what is is....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. haha..........n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
holboz Donating Member (641 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
26. He must have read in Vanity Fair that it's the trendy phrase to use.
It's in this month issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. That's the same answer my former CIO gave.

When he was defending a completely indefensible policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. My, what disingenuous spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. I yam what I yam and that's all what I yam
He's POOPeye the failure man! (toot toot)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hadley told his staff it wasn't him. oops n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Anyone want to bet that * will STILL decide NOT to fire him even if...
Edited on Sat Nov-19-05 08:08 PM by Up2Late
...this turns out to be true?

He'll come up with some sort of BS excuse not to fire him.:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. All of Bushco needs to be fired, including *...
where's the Donald when you need him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. see thats when he'll get his medal of Freedom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. the White House or the Animal House?
"You fu*ked up. You trusted us."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. jeeze they really are all just sleazey crooks
"it is what it is" :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. Wasn't Hadley tied to the niger forgeries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Halliburton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. yeah he was the pointman in the WH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Isn't Hadley also
the Dark Lord's new Chief of Staff, since Scooter Poot had to resign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngGale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. LMAO..."Animal House"...
the White House is above reproach.:sarcasm:

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
19. Hadley is gonna bring down this President.
Say the name often, and get to know it well. It's becoming obvious that Bob Woodward's little juke-move this week was very fortuitously timed.

What influence did Hadley's disclosure have on the outing of Valerie Wilson? Probably none. Like Woodward said, it doesn't really matter that much.

But Mr. Hadley is VERY important in the huge, disgusting crime which lies beneath the mere outing of Valerie Wilson. Hadley was the guy in charge of the rogue intelligence meetings with Italian agents, and was warned by the CIA to stop them. Hadley appears to be the guy who arranged for those document forgeries to be delivered. Hadley is the guy who overrode George Tenet's objections and placed the uranium sentence in the State of the Union Address.

And guess who promoted Mr. Hadley for doing all of that highly unprofessional, unethical, and illegal stuff? That's right, the President himself gave Hadley Condoleeza Rice's old job when she moved to the State Department. Criminal conspiracies try to keep it all in the family, and that's just what happened here.

Hadley is the last guy in between the President and the abyss. Now the press is on to him, and they are in the enviable position of being able to advance a criminal case against the White House while the White House is trying to kill the investigation before it starts.

They're not going to get away with it now. Now that Hadley is part of Plamegate, it's going to be easy for the press to lead the public straight into the false justification of the war, and the fact that the President rewarded him for producing forged documents.

Thank you, Mr. Woodward.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdelaguna2000 Donating Member (300 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Nice low down. Thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. excellent analysis
I agree - Hadley is the central lieutenant in the Plamegate/Iraq Deception conspiracy. I expect the revelation of Hadley's involvement will likely be the proverbial straw that broke the camel's back and ultimately topple this administration.

Not too shabby, Mr. Woodward...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. sofa king, I am posting your post as its own thread
your post is post of the day, IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. and Hadley is on BUSH's staff
not Cheney's right? That seems significant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suegeo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
22. If true, at least Hadley is a shade better than the last NSA
Think about that: Bush's National Security Adviser (Hadley) has compromised our national security by leaking the name of a CIA agent working on WMDs. As bad as that is, it's still not as bad as our last National Security Adviser (Rice), who presided over our national security when one of the biggest failures in national security (September 11) took place. Well, I mean, the attacks were a failure from the perspective of your average peasant. But from the perspective of the perpetrators...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
27. Why do they keep repeating this bit about her covert status?
"It is an offence in America to reveal the identity of a covert agent, although doubts remain about Plame’s precise status."

There is no doubt she was covert, so why do they play this game?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
many a good man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Fitz said her status was "classified"
And that's good enough for him (and the CIA).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC