Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Pentagon crosses the lexicon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-03 09:47 PM
Original message
The Pentagon crosses the lexicon
As the horizon in Iraq recedes, the U.S. military’s language adapts.


Conservative Iraq war supporters like Sen. John Warner, R-Va.; Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.; Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind.; Rep. Frank Wolf, R-Va.; and Rep. Curt Weldon, R-Pa., all have expressed concern of late that the administration is putting too rosy a tint on the Iraq war.

“It is perhaps the greatest mistake made by the Johnson and Nixon administrations with regard to Vietnam,” says a Senate Republican source. “You have to tell the American people something that meshes with the facts on the ground, or sooner or later they’re going to stop believing anything you say, and then the critics look like geniuses.”

Abizaid apparently decided he wanted none of mincing words: “I think describing it as guerrilla tactics being employed against us is, you know, a proper thing to describe in strictly military terms.”

The terms refuse to be defined however. Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, commander of military forces in Iraq, last week called them “noncompliant forces.”



http://www.msnbc.com/news/987469.asp?0cv=CA01
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Q: Why did the Pentagon cross the road?
A: To lie on the other side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. it's a "WAL-MART" administration
putting a :) on everything

spin spin spin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. "noncompliant forces"?
Anyone heard that on Fox yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. Noncompliant forces?
In keeping with this theme, any Iraqi irregulars killed by our soldiers will henceforth be referred to as 'compliant forces.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. Im watching a repeat of Aaron Brown's CNN report
on the soldiers , their training, and the aftermath of killing that happens.
These are teenagers with guns, basically...Its like I told my son...
When you were in basic training, you were playing soldier. Your bayonet stuck itself into a tire.
You dont want to live the rest of your life knowing you stuck a bayonet into a human being.
He agreed.
These are teenagers with guns.
they will come home, and become adults who are a mess for the rest of their lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. missing words: bomb, ambush and WMD
-snip-

But certain words and phrases — descriptive nouns like “bomb” and “ambush,” along with less surprising terms like “WMD” — are missing in action, at least from the Pentagon’s briefings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC