Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wanted Man: I Had A Good Reason - loosening bolts on power lines

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 08:35 AM
Original message
Wanted Man: I Had A Good Reason - loosening bolts on power lines
A man sought by the FBI for allegedly loosening bolts on a high voltage power line tower in Northern California was arrested Sunday when he walked into a California Highway Patrol office looking for directions.

Michael Devyln Poulin said his action was intended to highlight domestic insecurity, and that he had been trying to surrender.

He was arrested in South Sacramento after a CHP employee recognized him from a wanted poster, said patrol spokesman Tom Marshall.

In a telephone interview with The Associated Press on Sunday morning, before his arrest, Poulin said he meant to highlight the nation's lack of security for the nation's power infrastructure by loosening and removing bolts at eight towers in four states.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/10/17/attack/main578657.shtml

I said this 2 years ago. Anyone who's not a complete couch potato and has been outside in our great land knows there are thousands of main places that could be targets. (this is why I honestly don't believe any terrorist even exist.) Ever gone camping anyone? See the power lines, small/medium sized dams, fresh water treatment plants, power substations, communication towers... It's just incredible nothing has been done about this, since we're at IMMANENT FEAR for the last 2.5 years and all the 'EVIL DOERS' and infiltrated our society.

Who was the first guy to do something like this? Paul Harvey the journalist. He broke into the military facility that the military said was the most secure site on Earth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. I agree with you on that one
I've been saying the same thing about our vulnerabilities and lack of terrorism. If there were really as many terrorists so determined to do things to us here in the US, they must be pretty lame (or really, really lazy slackers).

Think of Northern Ireland. Think of Israel, or Chechnya. Those areas have terrorism -- you can tell because stuff blows up all the time.

HERE? We should worry about the Bush administration more than terrorism, judging by who's done the most damage to this country...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. and likely
to do more and more.
IWaq is a vanity war, NOT a war on terrorism.
dammit, i want him hanged at the Hague.
now that would satisfy me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. This is where our Media and Gov. could easily be proved guilty
(for something) in a court a law! If there were any terrorists in our country they'd have more than 100,000,000 targets with 100% escapability and 2.5 years to do it.

I don't believe Bush, Asscroft, and Ridge. Total liars.

But I guess the terrorists are waiting for the election debates to start so Bush will have to cancel the debates for 'National Security' reasons. And the terrorist will unwittingly hand the Presidency to the man who is the only only man on Earth they fear. The only man on Earth who can kill them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. Problem is that there aren't any terrorists.
Hence, no terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace_2_Everyone Donating Member (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is what sickens me about
Wal-Mart subcontracting out to companies that have to be hiring illegals to met wallly’s low pay standards (while making a healthy profit for the owners)

MAYBE none of the illegals in our store were terrorist,(Who can honestly say?) maybe they don’t even know any terrorist. But they learn how wal-mart works and it’s weak spots and their stories could get to the ears of a trained terrorist. Wal-Mart stores are a huge soft target, and wal-mart management doesn’t give a damn.

The time the INS spend investigating wally world should have been spent elsewhere. Someone in wal-mart management should be charged with treason!

They only care about today’s $
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jokerman93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. No Terror War? No Terrorists? True but...
just wait.

Remember the so-called "Terror War" is a product rollout. It has been egineered, planned for, and provoked. It is now a reality, and at the moment, the front lines are in Iraq.

But I'm convinced that George Bush and the neocons have every intention of prosecuting this war to its apocalyptic conclusion, and are apparently still preparing for more destruction here in Amerikaland.

I'm sickened and outraged every day I see the amplifying violence in Iraq, and the increasingly bold and belicose religiosity that characterizes the benighted Americans who are supporting the escalation of this war in some kind of trancelike patriotic fog.

Seems like there's plenty of folks everywhere who WANT some kind of clash of fundamentalist civilizations.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ernesto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. I was in Redding when the story broke
as the guy was seen fleeing the scene and his license number was taken. The local rag (the Redding Record Searchlight) immedeatly declared that this guy was a terrorist member of a "left wing enviromentalist group". Where they got their "facts" is anybody's guess. An example of a small town reporter copy-catting his heroes @ FOX?...... Disgusting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldSoldier Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. If it wasn't for do-gooders...
there would be no terrorism.

This guy is, arguably, a domestic terrorist. Runnin' around takin' high-voltage towers apart to show America how insecure its power transmission system is. No terrorist is going to pull bolts out of a high-voltage tower; it's not showy enough and it takes too long. He's going to try a high-profile attack, like stealing an airplane and flying it into a power plant.

Same shit with computer viruses. Some guy gets busted for writing a major virus, what's the first thing out of his mouth? "I was trying to highlight the insecurity in our computer system!" Well, if you little fucks would quit exploiting the fuckin' insecurities in our computer system, the virus problem would basically go away. A real terrorist would do something showy, like bomb Microsoft (which, ironically, would increase computer security by orders of magnitude). "Oh my! The terrorists have unleashed a computer virus that has erased all the bestiality porn from my computer!" Uhh...that sounds like a good thing to me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC