Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Spy court judge often ripped post-Sept. 11 detentions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 02:33 PM
Original message
Spy court judge often ripped post-Sept. 11 detentions

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/13463808.htm

Spy court judge often ripped post-Sept. 11 detentions
CRITIC WHO RESIGNED REMAINS ON FEDERAL BENCH AND WILL HAVE SAY ON GUANTÁNAMO CASE


Knight Ridder

The federal judge who quit the nation's secret spy court in protest over the Bush administration's covert domestic wiretaps has been one of the judiciary's most active and feisty critics of the Guantánamo Bay detention facility in Cuba, where the United States has held hundreds of foreigners for years without charge.

Despite his resignation from the spy court, U.S. District Judge James Robertson, 67, remains on the federal bench and is expected to issue another ruling in a Guantánamo case later this week.

...

Duke University law Professor Scott Silliman cast Robertson as one of the judiciary's leading critics of the president's war powers; his Hamdan ruling declared the president's commissions both unconstitutional and in defiance of the Geneva Conventions.

``He feels strongly that the rule of law must pertain to some of these cases,'' said Silliman, who does not know the judge but has read his rulings. ``He is aware of the fact that until a court rules on what rights these detainees at Guantánamo Bay have, they are in legal limbo.''

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lochloosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. I predict some bad rulings for the * cabal
Edited on Thu Dec-22-05 02:42 PM by Lochloosa
With this and the 4th District refusing to throw out the Padilla suit, it could be a bad year for the idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. 4th Circ. is (was) pro bush. No longer. I guess they trust that scrap of
paper. That quaint aged document called the constitution.

There will be a steady drumbeat of bad news.
Unless politics intercedes in the Abramof negotiations and screw us like the did with the tobacco litigation, his turning on his fiends and coconspirators will be an extremely dangerous for the shitheads in power.

And lastly, we need to fully flush out the most obvious, least stated fact. frame it precisely and simply. Repeat it endlessly.
Bush is destroying our constitution. Period.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC