Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Federal Judge Rules Chinese Gitmo Detainees Can be Held Indefinitely

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 11:24 PM
Original message
Federal Judge Rules Chinese Gitmo Detainees Can be Held Indefinitely



Federal judge rules Chinese Gitmo detainees can be held indefinitely


Bernard Hibbitts, Jurist News, Thursday, December 22, 2005, at 7:39 PM ET

(JURIST NEWS) A federal judge ruled Thursday that two Chinese Uighur detainees held by the US at Guantanamo Bay could be detained there indefinitely even though their imprisonment was unlawful. US District Judge James Robertson said that the courts simply had no relief to offer the men, who are no longer deemed enemy combatants by the government (JURIST report) but who cannot be returned to China, where they could face death or torture because of their Muslim faith (Human Rights Watch report). Robertson said an order requiring their release inside the United States was not feasible for a variety of security and diplomatic reasons. Read Robertson's memorandum ruling (.pdf format, AdobeReader® required) and accompanying order (.pdf format, AdobeReader® required). AP has more. Robertson, who had previously been publicly critical of the Uighurs' continuing detention (JURIST report), made headlines earlier this week in another context when he resigned from on(sic) the 11-member Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) (JURIST report) after reportedly expressing concern about a program authorized by President Bush to conduct warrantless wiretaps on international communications by US residents with known links to al Qaeda or other terrorist organizations.

. . . more at . . . http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2005/12/federal-judge-rules-chinese-gitmo.php
.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. What a nightmare
Are China and the US the ONLY countries in the world :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well, there's one other . . . his country of birth . . . but . . .
    "(The Gitmo detainee,) Turkistani . . . an ethnic Uighur (pronounced wee-gurs) who was born and raised in Saudi Arabia . . . remains incarcerated because the United States simply does not know what to do with him. He does not have Saudi citizenship, and U.S. officials are having trouble getting his home country to take him back. U.S. officials do not want to send him to China, where Uighurs are seeking a separate homeland, saying he is likely to be tortured.

    But unlike many detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Turkistani was not captured on the battlefield, nor was he a suspected terrorist. Instead, he was swept up in the confusion that marked the early days of the U.S. war in Afghanistan, and even as a potential ally found himself with no recourse to challenge his detention."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/14/AR2005121402125.html (by Josh White and Robin Wright, Washington Post Staff Writers, Thursday, December 15, 2005; Page A09)
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Various governments complain about Gitmo, but won't accept a detainee?
(The Gitmo detainee,) (...) who was born and raised in Saudi Arabia . . . remains incarcerated because the United States simply does not know what to do with him. He does not have Saudi citizenship, and U.S. officials are having trouble getting his home country to take him back. U.S. officials do not want to send him to China, where Uighurs are seeking a separate homeland, saying he is likely to be tortured.

Why can't they send him to some reasonably calm part of Afghanistan? If the government of Afghanistan expects US soldiers to risk their lives in Afghanistan and expects tax money from US taxpayers to be spent in Afghanistan, then shouldn't the government of Afghanistan accept at least a few refugees?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. Is there a US embassy in Saudi Arabia?
Why can't the detainee live in the embassy and then venture out with television crews filming him and showing how he is treated by Saudi government officials?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Woh
that part of where they face torture or death because of their Muslim faith is untrue.
China has a very large population of muslim. Go check info on china on religion.

But gee if they are suspected Terrorist and they cant prove their innocent in China they be shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
6th Borough Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Most likely an East Turkestan separatist (or thought to be so by the PRC)
Rarely does the media bother clarifying issues such as these (quite often, the journalist doesn't understand the complexities him/herself) in any news release intended for widespread consumption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. Gitmo - a "policy" designed by the bush admin.
From the "no longert deemed ..." article: A Pentagon spokesman said the US makes it clear that it is unwilling to "return or extradite individuals to other countries where it believes that it is 'more likely than not' that they will be tortured or subject to persecution."

What do they think keeping them in prison is if it's not persecution? If the alternative is between possible torture or persecution and definite imprisonment here - I'll take my chances with the possible. Have they taken into account the desires of these innocent individuals that they happen to be holding in prison?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. the only thing this mal-administration does really well is to F*** up
everyones lives.

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. Judge: 2 held illegally by U.S. (Judge James Robertson)

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0512230321dec23,1,4022911.story?coll=chi-newsnationworld-hed

Judge: 2 held illegally by U.S.

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- A federal judge ruled Thursday that the continued detention of two ethnic Uighurs at the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, is "unlawful," but he decided he had no authority to order their release.

U.S. District Judge James Robertson criticized the detention of A'Del Abdu al-Hakim and Abu Baker Qassim.

The men have been jailed at Guantanamo for four years and have been cleared for release because the government has determined they are not enemy combatants and are not a threat to the United States.

But Robertson said his court has "no relief to offer" because the government has not found a country to accept the men and because he does not have authority to let them enter the United States.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The US is creating a whole new type of refugee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Is this the Judge Robertson who resigned from the FISA Court this week?
Looks like it.

snip

-On Monday, one of 10 FISA judges, federal Judge James Robertson, submitted his resignation -- in protest of the president's action, according to two sources familiar with his decision. He will maintain his position on the U.S. District Court here.

snip

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/21/AR2005122102326.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. if they are not enemy combatants, how on earth can we still hold them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. It seems that the US government is responsible for helping
them build new lives, somewhere. "You break it, you buy it" seems to apply here. Four long years...I can't imagine...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. He should order the government to put them right back where they got them.
As far as being tortured, the U.S. has already been torturing them. They can do no worse than being tortured, yet innocent, for the last 3 1/2 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greiner3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
13. Parallel's Lincoln's;
'Man without a country.'

Happy Holidays anyway!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
16. Is the Chinese government controlled by some kind of computer?
Edited on Sat Dec-24-05 11:06 AM by Boojatta
"cannot be returned to China, where they could face death or torture"

How about this: an explicit promise from the Chinese government that those two people will not face death, torture, or any kind of mistreatment from the Chinese government? If the promise is broken, then the US can temporarily stop, for a few years, immigration from China into the USA. Are we expected to believe that there aren't any politically influential people in China who have friends or relatives who want to move to the United States?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC