Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US frees Aussie from the hell of Abu Ghraib (held w/o charge for 2 years)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-29-05 01:25 PM
Original message
US frees Aussie from the hell of Abu Ghraib (held w/o charge for 2 years)
Edited on Thu Dec-29-05 01:34 PM by Barrett808
US frees Aussie from the hell of Abu Ghraib
Natalie O'Brien
December 30, 2005

AN Australian who travelled to Iraq to marry his cousin and ended up imprisoned in the notorious Abu Ghraib jail for "security reasons" has finally been released by the US military, after being held without charge for almost two years.

The Adelaide-based family of Ahmed Aziz Rafiq confirmed he had been freed and had fled Iraq with his new wife for an undisclosed Middle Eastern country.

But they accused the federal Government of doing little to help the 26-year-old former supermarket worker.

His cousin, Sameer Saaid, said the Government had not sent a representative to meet him when he was released from US custody.

"I asked them to assist him and they said it was family business ... 'We don't interfere'," he said, adding that they could have helped if only by expediting a visa application by Mr Rafiq's wife so the couple could return to Australia.

(more)

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,17688812%255E2702,00.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-29-05 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. How nice of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NIGHT TRIPPER Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-29-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. no.... it's not "nice of us" ---->it's " Mighty WHITE of us " n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yknot Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-29-05 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. On the list of dark episodes in American history
the "war on terror" will ultimately be viewed as one of the most tragic, unjust, and embarrassing, in a long litany.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-29-05 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Absolutely. It's our Inquisition. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-29-05 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Good analogy. Torture, religion, wealth disparity etc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-29-05 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. The stories he could tell....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-29-05 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. I'd like to hear them. And then see a brave person take them to
junior for a knock down drag out brawl.

Two years out of a man's life for absolutely nothing. Guilty of love only!

Meanwhile Osama dances off into the sunset, while we quietly remove our military installations from Saudi Arabia. (Which was the whole point of 911)

That Goddamn Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-29-05 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Held for the pleasure of this War Criminal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-29-05 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Just One More Crumble In the Wall of Denial
It's going to be a glorious New Year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-29-05 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. Will we ever see the photographs...
...that have been tied uo in the courts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trevelyan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-29-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Petitions at CCR - Center for Constitutional Rights
http://www.cageprisoners.com/
http://www.ccr-ny.org/v2/home.asp
http://www.witnesstorture.org/ Please sign letter of Solidarity
http://katrinafemacamps.blogspot.com/
Rep. Waxman has numerous items on his website about investigatios in to Abu Ghraib - sign up for this brave Congressman's email updates.

http://www.ccr-ny.org/v2/reports/report.asp?ObjID=VJQl1vGD5N&Content=684==Center for Constitutional Rights Statement on Dangers of Court-Stripping and Graham-Levin Amendment

Synopsis

As Congress supposedly outlaws torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment by its support of the McCain Amendment, it will at the same time foster both torture and indefinite detention without judicial oversight if it supports the Graham-Levin Amendment. What McCain gives with one hand, Graham-Levin, as now proposed takes away with the other.

McCain forbids torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading interrogation. Graham-Levin, on the other hand, authorizes the use of evidence obtained through these methods in military tribunals, "if probative," ie, if it is useful or relevant to the proceedings. Since virtually all information is "probative," this provision opens the door wide to the torture that McCain supposedly shuts. In addition, while we have one public document, the Army Field Manual, that forbids torture, the Administration has just introduced a secret "Addendum" to the manual that essentially sanctions torture.

Further, Graham-Levin prevents any victim of torture at Guantánamo from filing a lawsuit against those responsible. The message that Graham-Levin therefore sends is that regardless of what Congress says in McCain, there will be no public airing of torture when and if it happens, no sanctions for engaging in torture, and no compensation for victims of torture. For centuries, torture has been the most reviled thing that one person can do to another. This law will deny to victims of those acts the right they have held for centuries, to go to court and sue.

Most disturbing, Graham-Levin will eliminate the historic right of habeas corpus for anyone held at Guantánamo. Federal courts will be stripped of habeas jurisdiction for the first time in well over a century. By undertaking a major change in the jurisdiction of federal courts, by way of eliminating a right, the origins of which go back to the Magna Carta in 1215, Graham-Levin constitutes a beachhead in what we fear to be a campaign to undermine fundamental rights in the United States and around the world.

The New York Times called the Graham-Levin amendment "a malignant measure" in a critical editorial today, and warned that it "would do grievous harm to the rule that the government cannot just lock you up without showing cause to a court. This fundamental principle of democratic justice must not be watered down so the Bush administration does not have to answer for the illegal detentions of hundreds of men at Guantánamo Bay and other prison camps." The Center for Constitutional Rights stands with all the leading civil and human rights organizations to condemn the Graham-Levin amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-29-05 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Thanks for the links.
And I agree with you about Waxman...a very brave man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-29-05 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. Travelled to Iraq to marry his cousin?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Violet_Crumble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-29-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Thanks for pointing out the most important aspect of this article...
Anyone would think being kept in Abu Graib without charge for two years is the important thing here, so thank you for pointing out that it fades into insignificance next to something that could get him on an episode of Springer if he ever visits the US...

Violet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-29-05 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Marriages to cousins are not considered incestuous there, I guess
In fact, they are illegal only in some U.S. states, not all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-29-05 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Gee....what an insightful remark!! What are you complaining about....
...sounds like your parents were siblings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-29-05 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Quite common in that ethnic group....
I lived in the M.E. and still don't really get it, probably about money and land ownership staying in the family. It's not necessarily a blood cousin or a first cousin.

Then again, I think my ex was supposed to marry his father's brother's daughter, so that would be a first cousin. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-29-05 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. We don't interfere.
Well for 2 years we do, but watcha gonna do? Nothing to see here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC