|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Algorem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 08:42 AM Original message |
Clinton says he didn't use warrantless wiretaps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sasha031 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 08:47 AM Response to Original message |
1. I miss the 90's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Waya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 08:51 AM Response to Original message |
2. Of course he didn't..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 09:02 AM Response to Original message |
3. And Bush said that all taps had warrants, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MemphisTiger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
4. It's funny how neocons now want to compare something Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 10:28 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Time for the eye rolling and "Well you know about Clinton" hints |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sofa king (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
5. One of my favorite things about the Big Dawg.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wysiwyg (167 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 10:24 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. The difference is that Bill Clinton actually gives a damn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 11:06 AM Response to Reply #5 |
12. he specifically mentioned the Supreme Court-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhereThereIsFire (193 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 03:06 PM Response to Reply #5 |
17. I really like this ... Clinton as Big Dawg |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
6. got that msm!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jhain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
9. "a decision the Supreme Court would have to resolve." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
10. Actually, he was noncommital. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
11. once the Congress had spoken==but Jr uses his signiture comments to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
13. recommended NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac56 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
14. You can already hear the RW response to this, can't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az_lefty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
15. ''I think that's a decision the Supreme Court would have to resolve.'' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buck Rabbit (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 02:09 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. I disagree with Clinton on this part. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Algorem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 04:08 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. I can't believe we need the Supreme Court to rule on this either,Really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Massacure (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
19. The supreme court would rule in Bush's favor on this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 02:46 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC