Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Libby's lawyers want to subpoena reporters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 03:55 PM
Original message
Libby's lawyers want to subpoena reporters

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/politics/13673695.htm

Libby's lawyers want to subpoena reporters



WASHINGTON - Lawyers for a former top aide to Vice President Dick Cheney told a federal judge Friday they want to subpoena journalists and news organizations for documents they may have related to the leak of a CIA operative's name.

In a joint filing with prosecutors, lawyers for I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, 55, warned U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton that a trial likely will be delayed because of their strategy to seek more subpoenas of reporters' notes and other records.

Libby was indicted last year on charges that he lied to FBI agents and a federal grand jury about how he learned CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity and when he subsequently told reporters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. ARRAGGHRRORWR
ARRAGGHRRORWR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Delay to past the fall election season?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. For sure, and when they refuse, Luskin moves for mistrial
because he claims his client cannot get exculpatory evidence.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. HAHAHAHA!!!
All this will do is show how intimate the government and media were. Ultimately, it'll do more harm than good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. Aside from being a delaying tactic...
this is likely to fall flat on it's ugly face, since the reporters involved have supposedly already turned over the documents to the independant prosecutor, and a simple discovery should do the trick. I won't be surprised if the judge allows this, but it is mostly just a HUGE waste of time and everyone involved KNOWS this. They are just trying to delay the start of the actual trial until after the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wouldn't they get this info via Discovery?
I don't understand the need for subpoenas? It sounds like they want to delay the trial, but WHY? Surely they don't hope to postphone it until after November!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. A delay tactic so that can give more time for Bush Regime...
but it will definitely put the news media in the hot seat...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. He wants to subpoena records that Fitz hasn't already?
Hmmm. Possibly very interesting.

He would get to see everything that Fitz has through discovery (hey, I watched My Cousin Vinny), so what else does he think is out there?

If I'm the judge, I would like to request a list of requested targets and substantiated reasons why they are on the list. And have it to me by 1/27.

And if it looks like a frivolous delaying tactic, I would threaten with contempt!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. to drag it out for a year or so...
or at least until AFTER the midterm elections? oh, and to do their usual 'lets blame the liberal media' game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A Simple Game Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. And right after the midterm elections, we have
two full years to forget about the pardon(s).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. Double-take: thought it meant al-Libby, so-called al-Qaeda #3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. NYT: Lawyers in C.I.A. Leak Case Seek to Subpoena Journalists
Lawyers in C.I.A. Leak Case Seek to Subpoena Journalists
By DAVID JOHNSTON
Published: January 21, 2006


WASHINGTON, Jan. 20 - Lawyers for Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff told a federal judge on Friday that they would seek to subpoena reporters and news organizations to obtain additional documents that could assist in his defense in the C.I.A. leak case.

In legal papers filed in federal court, the lawyers for Mr. Cheney's former aide, I. Lewis Libby Jr., did not identify the reporters or news organizations that they intended to subpoena nor did the lawyers identify what kind of information might be sought.

But the lawyers told the federal district judge, Reggie B. Walton, in the filing that Mr. Libby's trial could be delayed by the effort to gather more information from journalists who could be expected to resist the subpoenas. No trial date has been set.

The filing on Friday was a joint submission by the defense and the prosecution, made at the request of the judge in advance of a Feb. 3 hearing on the status of the case. The legal paper, a road map to unresolved issues in the case, suggested there could be bruising legal fights ahead.

The combative tone of the statements by Mr. Libby's defense team seemed to underscore the assertions of his lawyers that they intended to conduct an aggressive legal strategy. Mr. Libby has pleaded not guilty....


http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/21/national/21libby.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. The New York Times ignored Gore's speech, maybe it is time
we ignore the New York Times. Besides, Libby is under orders to try to run out the clock so that his trial comes after the November elections so that the Repukes don't have to steal as many votes as they would otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Trying to make more reporters fearful so they will attack Fitzgerald is
what's likely, too. If there are any honest reporters who have information this will tie them up and they are going to be very careful to be good "Bushbots" for fear of all the legal fees or losing their job or going to prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC