Royal servant tells newspaper of 'incident' involving UK's Prince Charles

[Khephra]

Royal servant tells newspaper of 'incident' involving Britain's Prince Charles and aide

ASSOCIATED PRESS

LONDON, Nov. 8 — A Sunday newspaper in Britain has published an interview with the former royal servant whose allegations involving Prince Charles have been the subject of media and public speculation for a week.

But the report in The Mail on Sunday shed little new light on the allegations by former royal valet George Smith, because a court order restricted reporting.

The newspaper quoted Smith as saying he had witnessed an incident — not described or qualified — involving Prince Charles and another royal aide. Smith also reportedly claimed he was raped by the same aide. The newspaper gave no further details.

MORE............

http://famulus.msnbc.com/FamulusIntl/ap11-08-162404.asp?reg=EUROPE

I'm not following this story, but I've seen a lot of people questioning on what was up...and as ever, I'm happy to help.

[DuctapeFatwa]

1. Hey Last night it was a different guy!

Is Charles a boyslut?

[Rowdyboy]

2. I think this is the first time

Charles, specifically, has been named as the royal who was found asleep in bed with a "manservant"

[DuctapeFatwa]

3. yeah but last night it was a different 'manservant'

I suspect there is going to be some major below-stairs grumbling going on...

[Sibanetta]

4. HRH

Are you sure it wasn't Camilla...let's face it she is NOT a pretty woman?..or is Camilla Charlie's "beard"...H-m-m-m-

[DuctapeFatwa]

6. At least I hope she knew she was a beard

That would be awful if she didn't, after 30 years or so..

[OKNancy]

8. Doesn't it bother anyone else about the cracks about Camilla's

appearance? I mean Charles and Camilla seem about right for each other. Personally, I would hope that most men would prefer someone whom they could have a conversation with and some things in common.

And perhaps Charles does something many men his age do: they remember the young beauty they fell in love with, and grow to have a deep bond with age.

[Rowdyboy]

11. Sorry, Nancy

I bought into the whole schtick about Diana...As a gay man, I came to adore her and despise him for treating her so poorly. His family does not have a very good record as far as making in-laws particularly welcome. Diana was literally a breath of fresh air who was tricked into a role she didn't particularly want. Because of that, she lost her freedom and her life ended far too soon. She reminds me of Lady Jane Grey, in that respect. Camilla intruded, not once or twice, but fullforce into a marriage. Thats not right.

I'm sure they love each other. I just wish they would go away somewhere so I wouldn't have to witness it.

[dbt]

5. This site purports to have details:

www.asticles.com/asticles/princecharles.htm

I have not requested the email. Perhaps a more daring individual would be willing?

:freak:
dbt

[jus_the_facts]

7. okay I took the dare....

...wanna copy in your inbox? :evilgrin:

[DuctapeFatwa]

9. yes please!

:D

[dbt]

10. Might as well

But I SWEAR if I get any more free Viagra samples...

:+
dbt

[shamanstar]

12. link to this article

http://www.asticles.com/asticles/thefull.htm

[Maple]

13. Satire site

the oversexed version of Onion. :D

[roguevalley]

14. Here's a part of their opening page. Lordy, they are so funny:

SNIP!

"There is one slight catch however. There always is.

We can't openly publish the lurid, salacious, unseemly, horny, hermaphroditic, earthy, lascivious, filthy, indecent, foul and yet, in the eyes of many, captivating and entrancing details.

And thereby risk a costly long drawn-out libel battle.

That we'd most certainly lose and then face years of incarceration through our inability to pay-up because we've offended the sensibilities of- and shocked to the core the remaining few British people who still believe The Royal Family is of any value and not a complete waste of space.

But nevertheless can't help engorging themselves on puerile facts about the sex acts the fucking-like-rodents Royal Family spend more time enjoying than opening AIDS clinics in Africa or withdrawing their and their U.S. masters' pit-bulls from the Middle East.

But we can send the report to you.

If you ask for it."

If you put it that way, I will. LOL!

Because there's no law preventing us doing that.

Don't worry. The complete unexpurgated report describes in precise anatomical detail the Royal heir's hirsute member so there can be no doubt about the report's (or the member's) veracity.

[Matilda]

15. Try this link. It's quite explicit.

http://www.throneout.com/royal_scandal.htm

The main problem with this is that the other story told by this
royal servant (George Smith)appears to have been a lie (he withdrew
his allegation of having been raped by another servant).

It does look as if Diana was trying to gather some real dirt on
Charles, but it's all rather pathetic really. Charles would
certainly not be the first gay or bi-sexual royal in Britain's
history, although he may be the last.