Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UK: High Court clears P&O's takeover

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 11:22 AM
Original message
UK: High Court clears P&O's takeover
Edited on Thu Mar-02-06 11:35 AM by muriel_volestrangler
Shipping and ports group P&O has had its £3.9bn ($6.8bn) takeover by Dubai Ports World approved by a High Court judge in London.

The bid from the United Arab Emirates based firm had faced opposition in the US, where P&O runs ports at key cities including Miami and New York.

P&O's US partner Eller & Co had tried to get the takeover blocked on the grounds it would cost jobs.

US politicians had also opposed the deal due to security concerns.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4765262.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. And I was hoping that Blair would pull the plug on this deal to help his
Chimp buddy out...

This means that Bush will go full steam ahead to ram this down our throats, unless Congress acts. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Blair couldn't intervene in a court case
without trashing a few hundred years of British legal precedent. 'TRANSEC', the Department of Transport's security department, OKed the takeover a couple of weeks ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EuroObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Unless it reaches the level of the Pinochet case, you mean? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. OK, good point
but extradition cases are easier for the government to intervene in than a straight financial case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EuroObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Sure. Though BTW I see extradition proceedings are no longer required
Edited on Thu Mar-02-06 05:43 PM by EuroObserver
in order (some kind of executive order, is that?) to send people from UK into US limbo on the basis of non-habeas corpus: not one shed of evidence...

On edit: as regards Pinochet, at least Chilean legal proceedings, although slow, appear to be proceeding largely as they should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC