Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Questions about Judges Republicans Don't Want to Answer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 03:20 PM
Original message
Questions about Judges Republicans Don't Want to Answer
November 12, 2003

http://democrats.senate.gov/judges1.html

Since the passage of the Senate organizing resolution 15 months ago, the Democratic-led Senate has confirmed 80 judicial nominees -- that’s more nominees than were confirmed during the first 15 months of the Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and Clinton Administrations.

In 2000, the Republican-controlled Senate confirmed only 39 judges, including 8 circuit judges; in 1999, only 34 judges, including 7 circuit court judges; in 1997, only 36 judges, including 7 circuit court judges; and in 1996, only 17 judges, with no circuit court judges confirmed at all that year.

When Republicans say Senate Democrats have “blocked” almost 40 percent of Bush nominees, they are including all Bush nominees that have not been confirmed – even if they were only recently nominated or their files are incomplete. In reality, of the Bush judicial nominees still pending, 60 percent have been nominated within the last four months.

More than a dozen, well-qualified Clinton nominees had to wait over 500 days to be confirmed, including nine who waited over 700 days, four who waited over 900 days, two who waited over 1,000 days, and one, Richard Paez, who waited 1,520 days from nomination to confirmation.

How about Hispanic-American judicial nominees – who has the better record?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC