Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pakistan weekly spills 9/11 beans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 09:29 AM
Original message
Pakistan weekly spills 9/11 beans
Pakistan weekly spills 9/11 beans

Monday, March 13, 2006

New Delhi, March 12: The Pakistan foreign office had paid tens of thousands of dollars to lobbyists in the US to get anti-Pakistan references dropped from the 9/11 inquiry commission report, The Friday Times has claimed.

The Pakistani weekly said its story is based on disclosures made by foreign service officials to the Public Accounts Committee at a secret meeting in Islamabad on Tuesday.

It claimed that some of the commission members were also bribed to prevent them from including damaging information about Pakistan.

...

The report quoted an officer as saying that dramatic changes were made in the final draft of the inquiry commission after the lobbyists got to work. The panel was formed to probe the September 11 terror attack and make suggestions to fight terrorism.

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1060313/asp/nation/story_5962372.asp

The Friday Times (subscription only)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dunvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. No one could have anticipated this would happen...
...and, sorry but the Administration cannot address that because there is an ongoing investigation...:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thank goddess for that special Presidential quick reaction investigation team
They are able to spring into action and initiate an investigation at literally a moments notice! Saved again...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. This may be 100% true, but look at the source.
Edited on Mon Mar-13-06 09:45 AM by leveymg
Much of the Indian and Pakistani press are conduits for propaganda against each other in their ongoing rivalry. If this has been reported in both the Indian and the Pakistani press, there may indeed be something to this. Too bad we can't read the original Pakistani report on-line.

I hope this story pans out - when it gets printed by a more reliable source - you'll hear me shout, "Eureka".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Interesting....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. You raise a point that I (and many others) also used to apply
but today the C4I wars are quite openly being fought on the Internet. This is why a lot of articles from previously reliable sources are not available or have been turned into disinfo.

Also consider that a lot of info can be gleaned from open sources that are compromised-just be wary of previously trusted sources--and, since this is a war, realize that truth can emerge from new sources.

The Pentagon's War on the Internet (this is true, but...)
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_510.shtml

Domestic spying links from The Crisis Papers
http://www.crisispapers.org/topics/spyscandal.htm

perception management background
http://www.au.af.mil/info-ops/perception.htm#
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Good lawd, that is so true. Just look at the bloody NYT
Everything has to go through those little holes in the salt shaker these days. Everything!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yep. The truth is always the truth, but it is buried in so much junk n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. For instance, see this report in the NYT. Most interesting for the
Edited on Mon Mar-13-06 11:02 AM by leveymg
denials of knowledge by Kissinger and Schultz of their association with the group that sponsored the junket to Pakistan organized by Abramoff. According to the NYT (take it for what its worth) Abramoff's firm ceased representing Pakistan in 1997. Note that date, and see my Note 1, below.

Here's a Times article based on old reports about the junket to Pakistan arranged by Abramoff. I don't see any new reporting here from stuff that was published six years ago, with the exception that Henry Kissinger and George Shultz's names appear, and that they issued denials of any role in the affair. Hmmm. All this suggests that in the late 1990s, Abramoff played a supporting role in the big-hitters efforts to help Pakistan with its nuclear program.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/08/politics/08abramoff.h...
Lobbyist Paid by Pakistan Led U.S. Delegation There


By PHILIP SHENON and ANNE E. KORNBLUT
Published: May 8, 2005
WASHINGTON, May 7 - Jack Abramoff, the lobbyist at the center of a federal corruption investigation, led a Congressional delegation to Pakistan in 1997 but failed to tell the group's sponsor or the lawmakers that he was a registered lobbyist for the Pakistani government, according to the sponsor and the two House members on the trip.

"I wish I'd known that he had a bias that way," said Representative Michael R. McNulty, Democrat of New York, who was on the trip. Gregg Hilton, whose nonprofit organization, the National Security Caucus Foundation, sponsored the trip for Mr. McNulty and Representative Howard Coble, said he felt "deceived" by Mr. Abramoff. The trip to Pakistan and Mr. Abramoff's role in it came to light with the release of documents this week showing that he had also used his personal credit card to pay more than $350,000 in travel expenses for other Congressional trips, some of them sponsored by the National Security Caucus Foundation, which is now defunct.

SNIP

Mr. Abramoff did not pay for the group's trip to Pakistan, Mr. Hilton said, adding that his foundation had arranged the trip's financing. A spokesman for Mr. Abramoff had no immediate comment on the trip. Government filings show Mr. Abramoff's law firm was registered as Pakistan's lobbyist until April 1997, after his trip. The firm said on Saturday that it did its last work on the contract in 1996 and did not consider Pakistan a client by 1997. By not revealing his lobbying work for Pakistan while he served as a tour guide there for the nonprofit group, Mr. Abramoff might have served his own business practices, but he also deceived the people he had offered to help, the trip's participants said.

SNIP

Lobbyists for foreign governments are required to register with the Justice Department. Disclosure statements filed by Mr. Abramoff and his former firm, Preston Gates & Ellis, show that the firm was retained by Pakistan in May 1995 to lobby to overturn sanctions barring delivery of American weapons to Pakistan if its government continued to pursue a nuclear weapons program. The initial six-month lobbying contract paid the firm a retainer of $165,000, plus expenses. A spokesman for Preston Gates had no comment. Later disclosure forms show that Mr. Abramoff and the firm lobbied aggressively on Pakistan's behalf, including repeated contacts with the offices of Mr. DeLay, a close friend of Mr. Abramoff. Mr. DeLay, now the House majority leader, has asked the House ethics committee to resolve accusations involving his overseas travels with Mr. Abramoff.

Mr. Hilton provided a number of descriptions of Mr. Abramoff's role with the National Security Caucus Foundation, at one point denying that the lobbyist had a formal role and suggesting that the trip to Pakistan had never happened. Provided evidence to the contrary, he acknowledged that he had hoped Mr. Abramoff would donate money and join the board, but that he never did. Some of the dignitaries listed on the letterhead of the foundation, including Henry A. Kissinger, Elie Wiesel and George P. Shultz, said they had never heard of the group or agreed to have their names used by it. Mr. Hilton said they were actually affiliated with a sister organization. Preston Gates's disclosure statements with the Justice Department show that the firm largely ended its lobbying activity for Pakistan after Prime Minister Bhutto's government was ousted in 1996. The firm was on record as Pakistan's foreign agent, however, until April 1997.

NOTE 1.
http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/pakistan/nuke/chron.htm
Pakistan's Nuclear Weapons - A chronology
1997
04 July 1997 -- Pakistan confirms test-firing of new indigenous Hatf missile.

06 September 1997 -- Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif claims Pakistan possesses nuclear weapons, saying that: "Pakistan's nuclear capability is now an established fact. Whatever we have, we have a right to keep it...."

1998

28 May 1998: Pakistan detonates five nuclear devices. Pakistan claimed that the five nuclear tests measured up to 5.0 on the Richter scale, with a reported yield of up to 40 KT (equivalent TNT).

30 May 1998 Pakistan tested one more nuclear warheads, with a yield of 12 kilotons, bringing the total number of claimed tests to six.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Henry Kissinger was originally named to head the 9/11 Commission. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Yes, and here's why:
All this suggests that in the mid to late 1990s, Abramoff played a supporting role in the big-hitters efforts to help Pakistan with its nuclear program. Recall also that Kissinger was originally tapped to head the 9/11 Commission. Consider as well, the UBL cells were being treated as part of the Pakistani-Saudi network that had produced the "Islamic bomb" with very high level American support. The birds came back to roost, so to speak, if indeed sections of the 9/11 Commission report concerning Pakistan were removed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Some take the Kissinger factor as a link to the fascists/Nazis that
were "recruited" at the close of WWII and given false identities and jobs in US national security.

There are different methadologies used in this stuff, depending upon where, and at whom, we look.

One thing is for sure-this is quite a mess and the disinfo and red herrings are all over the map--the truth is staggering, at first.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Henry was a grad student at Harvard and was assigned to G-2 interrogate
Edited on Mon Mar-13-06 12:02 PM by leveymg
German POWs and scientists. I recall seeing him referenced as having been part of Paperclip. Allen Dulles, Richard Helms and J.J. Angleton were also up to their necks in this stuff with "ex-Nazis" (both before and after World War Two). Angleton was definitely a self-described fascist sympathizer at Harvard, and Dulles and the elder Bushes active managers of German commercial interests. Like Angleton in Italy, Helms had lived and studied in Germany and had continuing family and professional contacts in Germany before and after the war.

Nothing really unusual about the Nazi/Fascist contacts part, the interesting question is the allegiances part. In the case of the Bush family, there may be some reason to question their loyalty. As for Kissinger, it's hard to categorize him -- he's far too complex for easy labeling. What his motives in the Pakistani nuclear program might have been, isn't entirely clear. Can you or someone cast some light on this?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. During WWII Kissinger served in the US Army Counterintelligence
Edited on Mon Mar-13-06 12:59 PM by bobthedrummer
Corps/CIC (this was at the close of the war). He stayed on active duty after the war in West Germany on assignment to the 970th CIC Detachment, which was later known as the 66th CIC Detachment "whose functions included support for the recruitment of ex-Nazi intelligence officers for anti-Soviet operations inside the Soviet bloc." (p.26; "The Price of Power: Kissinger in the Nixon White House"; Seymour M. Hersh; Summit Books 1983).

When Kissinger did return to the US as a young undergrad student (age 24) at Harvard in 1947 he kept his connection to military intelligence as a Reserve officer.

As a graduate student in 1950 Kissinger took a part-time job as a "consultant" to the Defense Department's Operations Research Office.

"That unit, under the direct control of the JCS, conducted highly classified studies on such topics as the utilization of former Germanoperatives and Nazi partisan supporters in CIA clandestine activities.

In 1952, Kissinger was named a consultant to the director of the Psychological Strategy Board, an operating arm of the NSC for covert psychological and paramilitary operations." (p.27; "The Price of Power").

To me, and a lot of history buffs, this helps to answer some of the questions about history since the installation of the George W. Bush administration.

Hope that is helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. Thomas Kean the Chairman of the committee was appointed
after grumbles were heard over Kissinger.

KIssinger and Mr. Kean are very good friends and with the bush family.

Kean's is highly questionable in my opinion...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Mutawakil (Who's who)
Edited on Mon Mar-13-06 11:17 AM by sattahipdeep
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/26/magazine/26taliban.html?pagewanted=10

Mr Mutawakil is the most senior Taleban figure to have been
arrested by the Americans and then released.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/3706370.stm

How does someone become an ex-terrorist?

How does someone become an ex-Taliban?

Q A question yesterday was also how does someone become an
ex-terrorist, if you will, member of the Taliban?

MR. ERELI: Well, I guess -- all I can tell you about that is
that at the time he applied, for the purposes for which he wished the

United -- to come to the United States, and based on a review of his
activity in the past, it was determined that there was no basis for
ineligibility.

Put in simple English, I think what you can conclude from that is
-- well, if -- I don't know that if -- if he was indeed a member of
the Taliban, being a member of the Taliban, in and of itself, is not
-- was not necessarily and is not -- was not necessarily at the time,
given what he was doing and what -- he wanted to come to the United
States, a grounds for ineligibility.

http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/-state-department-regular-briefing-briefer-adam-ereli-deputy-/2006/03/01/1421259.htm

"Put in simple English"

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Bonnieleezza-UAE




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. Most are blissfully unaware that the niece of Richard McGarrah Helms
Lalli Helms did a lot of work for the Taliban just prior to 9/11.

http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0124,ridgeway,25512,6.html

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2000/10/20/eveningnews/main242926.shtml

Front organization
http://www.usip.org/pubs/specialreports/early/sr_afghan.html

Christina Rocca also has played a role in some of this, especially when she was "assigned" to Sen. Brownback's office
http://www.saag.org/papers3/paper230.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Thanks for the reminder Bob
I'd forgotten all about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. It's a spook war and spies are expendible, much "collateral damage"
now imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. The Indian newspaper is quoting a Pakistani source
Edited on Mon Mar-13-06 11:41 AM by varun
www.thefridaytimes.com is the original source - a Pakistani weekly.

edited to correct URL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bhaisahab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
44. I can assure you
that the Telegraph *is* a reliable source. Its over a hundred years old, is published from the city of Calcutta, is one of the largest selling newspapers in India, and has excellent editorial vision and control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulthompson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. I find this extremely believable
Though I will wait to hear more. The only thing is, the 9/11 Commission didn't need to be bribed since they already had their own motives in suppressing the truth about this and so many other things. Check out this Los Angeles Times article that came out one month before the Commission's final report for more on how much the 9/11 Commission knew much more about Pakistan's ties to al-Qaeda than they were willing to put into their report:

http://scoop.agonist.org/story/2004/6/20/132815/063

Here's my timeline entry about it:

June 20, 2004: 9/11 Commission Figure Says Pakistan Was 'Up to Their Eyeballs' with Taliban and al-Qaeda
“An unnamed senior staff member” on the 9/11 Commission tells the Los Angeles Times that, before 9/11, Pakistani officials were “up to their eyeballs” in collaboration with the Taliban and al-Qaeda. As an example, this source says of bin Laden moving to Afghanistan in 1996, “He wouldn't go back there without Pakistan's approval and support, and had to comply with their rules and regulations.” From “day one,” the ISI helped al-Qaeda set up an infrastructure, and jointly operated training camps. The article further notes that what the commission will publicly say on this is just the "tip of the iceberg" of the material they've been given on the matter. (Los Angeles Times, 6/20/04) In fact, the commission's final report released a month later will barely mention the ISI at all. (9/11 Commission Final Report, 7/24/04)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. Pakistan hires Bush's man as US lobbyist
http://sify.com/news/international/fullstory.php?id=13385800

Tuesday, 10 February , 2004, 17:54
Islamabad: Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf has hired Frank Howard Jr., the man who managed President George W Bush's election campaign in 2001, as his key lobbyist in Washington.

Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan, the acting parliamentary leader of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz, told the Dawn newspaper that Howard was running a public relations firm in Bethesda, Maryland, and had played an important role in the Bush-Cheney election campaign.

He also claimed that Howard was staying at a five-star hotel here for the past many days, and was meeting a number of people.

<snip>

When contacted at his hotel, Howard confirmed that he was running a public relations firm named "Eagle" and was here on "business".

...more at link...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. After Jack Abramoff was a lobbyist for the Pakistani gov't until 1997.
He was at Preston Gates & Ellis at the time, and was retained by Pakistan in 1995 to lobby to overturn sanctions barring delivery of American weapons to Pakistan if its government continued to pursue a nuclear weapons program.


(And Pakistan now has American weapons AND nuclear weapons...)


Abramoff also led a Congressional delegation to Pakistan in 1997, without disclosing to either the Congress members or the sponsor of the trip that he was a registered lobbyist for Pakistan's gov't.

(Just to add all this to the story.)


I don't doubt this story in the opening post for a moment. Bribes are what these people do best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. Sourcewatch: Frank Howard Jr. report may be disinfo
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Bush_lies_and_deceptions:_The_Pakistani_Exception

February 10, 2004: The next day, Chaudhry Nisar told the Dawn newspaper that Pakistan's President Musharraf had hired Frank Howard, Jr., "the man who managed President George W. Bush's election campaign in 2001, as his key lobbyist in Washington." The parliamentary leader also told Dawn "that Howard was running a public relations firm in Bethesda, Maryland. ... When contacted at his hotel, Howard confirmed that he was running a public relations firm named 'Eagle' and was on 'business'." <4> (http://sify.com/news/international/fullstory.php?id=13385800)

It should be noted that the reliability of this information, although it made its way into the international media echo chamber, may not only be disinformation, but also, perhaps, deliberate propaganda.
First of all, George W. Bush was elected in November 2000, so an election campaign manager in 2001 would be unnecessary; secondly, information on Frank Howard, Jr., on the internet is conspicuous by its absence -- other than in this news announcement; and finally, Joe M. Allbaugh, who was Bush's chief of staff when he was governor of Texas, was his "campaign manager in 2000," not a "Frank Howard, Jr." <5> (http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0930-02.htm)
The "Frank Howard, Jr." and the "Eagle" public relations firm are both a mystery. The question then arises as to what was behind this announcement allegedly released from a member of Pakistan's government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Charlie Wilson succeed Abramoff as Pakistan's lobbyist?
Edited on Mon Mar-13-06 01:06 PM by leveymg
There's an old article in Dawn that seems to indicate that Charlie Wilson, a former Congressman from Texas whose major client was Israeli defense contractors, who had been heavily involved in aiding Pakistan and the Mujahadeen, succeeded Abramoff:

http://www.geocities.com/CollegePark/Library/9803/pak_strategic/pak_lobby.html
DAWN - Features; 10 January, 1998



Shaheen Sehbai


VERY FEW eyebrows have been raised or questions asked about the main Washington lobbyist for Israeli arms industries who was hired by Islamabad last year as the main lobbyist for Pakistan but all hell is ready to break out if attempts by some influential Pakistani-Americans to replace him with an Indian Government lobbyist are even considered by Islamabad.

The Israeli lobbyist, working for Israeli Military Industries Ltd., is none other than Pakistan's beloved and darling Democrat from Texas, Charlie Wilson, who retired from Congress last year and then waited for a year to begin his lobbying job for Israel and Pakistan in October, despite some high-profile strong-arm efforts by some Pakistani-Americans to push him aside and themselves takeover the job, lucrative both politically and financially.

Charlie's Israeli connection was revealed recently but another of his key connections that went unnoticed was his prized client-lobbyist relationship with Lockheed Martin, the aerospace giant and maker of F-16 aircraft against which Pakistan has claims of over $650 million dollars for not delivering the purchased planes or returning the money.

That may possibly explain why Islamabad and its representatives in Washington were eager to hire Charlie as their man on the Hill, as in one move they would be able to secure both their past and their future.

The past could be guarded by having their own paid man entrenched deep in the enemy camp once the F-16 issue goes for the marathon court battles after Pakistan sues Lockheed and the US. Future security could be ensured by keeping the channels to the Israelis open for any future military and weapons trade, once the politics of the Middle East was out of their bilateral relations. And Charlie fitted the mould perfectly.

But Charlie is not having a smooth ride, despite his credentials. In the hurly burly of the grand judiciary-executive super thriller in Islamabad late last year, a small Washington crowd was quietly playing its game to oust Charlie and replace him with, believe it or not, a lobbying firm which works for India. This crowd did not get the attention it needed because of the turmoil of Titanic proportions sweeping Islamabad.

This set of well-placed Pakistanis in the US had taken with them a gentleman called Terry McAuliffe whose firm was given the Indian lobbying contract by Ambassador Ray in Washington in 1994.

TM, as he is called, is the guy who was high up in the Clinton- Gore presidential campaign of 1992, specially on the fund-raising side and many Pakistani supporters of Clinton had made their way to the White House through TM, one of them also getting the symbolic privilege of flying with the President on Air Force One from Washington to Chicago.

TM and his Pakistani-American sponsors were actually being hosted in Islamabad by Gen Zia's son Ejaz-ul-Haq who, it is well known here, was returning the compliment of the "Chicago Group", the name given to a host of rich Pakistani activists from that Illinois city who believe nothing in Pakistan-US relations moves without their consent and if Nawaz Sharif came to the US or Clinton would be visiting Pakistan, it is they who deserve the credit.


Here's a snip about Wilson's exploits described in the book, "Charlie Wilson's War":http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0871138549/104-2615905-1675934?v=glance&n=283155

Wilson, a six-feet-four-inch Texas congressman,liberal on social issues but rabidly anti-Communist, a boozer, engaged in serial affairs and wheeler-dealer of consummate skill. Only slightly less improbable is Gust Avrakotos, a blue-collar Greek immigrant who joined the CIA when it was an Ivy League preserve and fought his elitist colleagues almost as ruthlessly as he fought the Soviet Union in the Cold War's waning years. In conjunction with President Zia of Pakistan in the 1980s, Wilson and Arvakotos circumvented most of the barriers to arming the Afghan mujahideen-distance, money, law and internal CIA politics, to name a few. Their coups included getting Israeli-modified Chinese weapons smuggled into Afghanistan, with the Pakistanis turning a blind eye,and the cultivation of a genius-level weapons designer and strategist named Michael Vickers, a key architect of the guerrilla campaign that left the Soviet army stymied. The ultimate weapon in Afghanistan was the portable Stinger anti-aircraft missile, which eliminated the Soviet's Mi-24 helicopter gunships and began the train of events leading to the collapse of the U.S.S.R. and its satellites. A triumph of ruthless ability over scruples, this story has dominated recent history in the form of blowback: many of the men armed by the CIA became the Taliban's murderous enforcers and Osama bin Laden's protectors.

###

Alliance with Gus Avrakotos
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Wilson_(politician)

An argument can be made that, in terms of the Cold War struggle to neutralize and weaken the Soviet Union, the most important recruitment in the CIA’s 30-year career was made that April 1984 by Gust Avrakotos when he enlisted Charlie Wilson, during an unannounced and unauthorized visit to the Congressman’s office

From that moment on, the terms of engagement for the CIA's war with the Red Army began to shift. Avrakotos had made a recruitment of sorts. This was the opening shot in what was going to become a Wilson-Avrakotos conspiracy, one that would very shortly succeed in neutralizing the traditional checks and balances that had been so carefully put in place to guide and restrain U.S. covert warfare. Wilson didn't yet know it but he had just found the true rogue elephant in the CIA.

Throughout the 1980s the Afghan mujahideen were America's surrogate soldiers in the brutal guerrilla war that became the Soviet Union's Vietnam, a defeat that helped trigger the subsequent collapse of the Communist empire. Afghanistan was a secret war that the CIA fought and won without debates in Congress or protests in the street. It was not just the CIA's biggest operation, it was the biggest secret war in history. In the course of a decade, billions of rounds of ammunition and hundreds of thousands of weapons were smuggled across the border on the backs of camels, mules, and donkeys. At one point over 300,000 fundamentalist \Afghan warriors carried weapons provided by the CIA; thousands were trained in the art of urban terror. Before it was over, some 28,000 Soviet soldiers were killed.

###

P.S. - Gus Avrakotos died on December 5, 2005 at age 67.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. So, finally, who bribed the 9/11 Commission?
According to Bill Berkowitz of Working Assets, there have been at least three GOP-associated PR firms which have handled the Pakistan account since 9/11. Berkowitz mentions Dan Pero of Sterling International, Fleishman-Hillard (F-H), and Polland & Cook.

Partnering with Pakistan
Bill Berkowitz - WorkingForChange
http://www.workingforchange.com/printitem.cfm?itemid=14031

11.05.02 - It's tough for even the best public relations outfits to spin really bad news. Recent examples like the surprisingly good showing of Islamic fundamentalists in current elections, a New York Times story claiming Pakistan sold equipment to North Korea enhancing its nuclear weapons capabilities, and reports that al Qaeda and Taliban leaders are now operating out of Pakistan, are either: a) a PR firm's biggest nightmare, b) a welcome and challenging task, c) financially rewarding, or d) all of the above. Whether there's bad news to spin or good news to promote, you can depend on a well-paid PR firm to step up to the plate.

Dan Pero, a founding partner in the newly established Sterling International Consulting Corporation, which recently inked a month-by-month media relations contract with Pakistan, told me he was "excited about the possibilities" and "anxious to tell" Pakistan's story." As Pero sees it, the story is about how a "key ally of the U.S. in the war against terrorism" is moving closer toward democracy.

Even before 9/11, Pakistan was shelling out major-league money to US-based PR firms with conservative credentials and GOP connections. At that time, PR challenges included the dispute with India over Kashmir, the country's nuclear weapons program, human rights violations by Pakistan's military leadership, and the use of child labor.

Since 9/11, however, the "war on terrorism" has taken center stage.

Pero said that Sterling International, an affiliated company of the Sterling Corporation, will receive $50,000 a month in an agreement that began in early September and will be evaluated at the end of November.


SNIP


Pakistan is not a newcomer to the PR game. In April of this year, the country hired Fleishman-Hillard (F-H) "to win Congressional approval for tariff relief," O'Dwyer's Daily reports. Donna Rohrer from F-H's Washington, D.C., office, recently noted that the campaign was now on hold -- "caught up in the national vise of our war on terror." F-H has been told to "back off from the media," she added.
F-H was promoting the "Pakistan Emergency Economic Development and Trade Support Act," introduced by Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.), which was aimed at rewarding Pakistan for its support for the president's "war on terrorism," O'Dwyers PR daily reported. The bill, that would have given Bush "the authority to reduce or suspend import duties on Pakistani apparel," was opposed by the U.S. apparel manufacturers. Pakistan already exports about $2 billion in apparel to the U.S., according to O'Dwyers.

In January 2002, O'Dwyers PR Daily reported that the country had hired the "well-connected Houston-based Republican firm, Polland & Cook, to help smooth ties with the U.S. just prior to the Sept. 11 attacks. The purpose was to end U.S. economic sanctions against Pakistan, bolster trade and debt restructure." Gary Polland, who chairs the Harris County GOP, "is 37.5 percent owner of a joint-venture known as 'Team Barakat,' registered lobbyist for the Islamic Republic of Pakistan." The company was given an $180,000 contract that could be "renewable for another two years," O'Dwyer's pointed out. How well connected to the GOP is Polland? In January 2001, he organized the Texas Inaugural Breakfast that was attended by Texas Senators Phil Gramm and Kay Bailey Hutchison and Majority Whip Rep. Tom Delay. The event also included a media panel consisting of John Fund (The Wall Street Journal), Grover Norquist (Americans for Tax Reform), John Gizzi (Human Events) and Glen Bolger (Public Opinion Strategies).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. Some more background on Pakistans' DC PR reps.
Benazir Bhutto hired her close friend Mark Siegel to lobby for her government when she was prime minister. Bhutto served two non-consecutive terms, 1988-1990 and 1993-1996, being removed from office on both occasions. President Farooq Leghari dismissed Benazir Bhutto's Government on charges of corruption and mismanagement on November 5, 1996. Leghari was in turn overthrown in a coup d'etat led by General Parviz Musharraf on October 12, 1999.

It would have been during the Leghari interegnum that Jack Abramoff's arranged the 1997 Congressional junket. Behind the scenes at that time, nonetheless, the Pakistani military and ISI intelligence service were really running the country's foreign policy, particularly relations with American and Israeli arms dealers. After the dual Paksitan-India nuclear test of May 1998, Congress voted to cut off arms shipments for military equipment to Karachi, much of which had already been paid for in advance. This greatly angered the Pakistani military, and cooperative ties have only recently been reestablished with the Bush Administration's so-called War on Terrorism, and the lifting of sanctions.

In the end, it was not lobbying but the diplomatic reproachment that followed the 9/11 attack that led to mended fences, leading to renewed US military exports. Writing in Zmagazine, Anjum Niaz. See, When lobbying is not a dirty word, Pakistan-US lobbying
by Anjum Niaz,(October 16, 2002) http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:Qvpq9xyyDkcJ:www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm%3FItemID%3D2493+Polland+%26+Cook+9/11+Pakistan&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=4

When Nawaz Sharif came to power, he hired Denis Neil as his lobbyist and paid him $360,000 annually. When the Siegel-Burton brouhaha broke, so did the news of Neil being arrested, sentenced and jailed on tax fraud hit the headlines. Pakistan’s lobbyists had squirted enough claptrap for the media’s robust appetite.

On hindsight, both our former prime ministers were gulled into making wrong choices. Siegel - paid $452,941 by Islamabad for his services in end July 1995 – whose joust with Dan Burton, a longtime friend of Pakistan could have ended in a disaster. Burton regularly backed causes of importance to Pakistan, particularly help remove the long-standing ban on aid that cleared the way for delivery of $368 million worth of U.S. missiles and other military equipment for which it already had paid.

Enter President Musharraf. He has hired Gary Polland, the head of the well-connected Houston-based Republican firm, Polland & Cook, “to help smooth ties with the US, to end US economic sanctions against Pakistan and bolster trade and debt restructure”.

“Team Barakat” is the name given to this venture. And TB’s job description? To clear tangled issues facing the client (Pakistan), like nuclear testing, Afghan refugees, Kashmir dispute with India, terrorism, human rights, economic debt restructure, child labor and Pakistan's transition to a civilian government.

TB's $180,000 contract became effective on Sept. 1. 2001. It is renewable for another two years. It covers only “advice, recommendations, and meetings with key US policymakers. Media services are not covered. The firm reports to President Gen. Pervez Musharraf.”





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazzleDazzle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. Good God. Is there NO ONE left in Washington who can't be bought?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jarab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. For the right price ...
everyone can be bought. Congressmens' thresholds on the lower end.
...O...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
24. I wonder how much the Saudis payed
not to have their financial ties to 9-11 investigated.

BUSH AND THE SAUDIS SITTIN' IN A TREE . . . KAY EYE ESS ESS EYE EN GEE
Greg Palast
http://www.gregpalast.com/printerfriendly.cfm?artid=253

"But here's the real kick in the head. Turns out that unlike the 18 minutes missing from the Nixon tape, the 28 pages missing from Congress' publicly released report on the September 11 attack has been found. And it turns out to be a summary of Saudi Arabia's financing of terrorist fronts including the 'charities' supporting Al Qaeda."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
25. only "tens of thousands"? Shrubco is easily, and cheaply, bought
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
26. Is there ANYTHING in America that Bushco won't sell to the highest bidder?
Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
29. Yep our congress did this sold their souls
to hide the people who attacked New York what kinda Americans are these!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
31. BAE, and the BCCI have points of tangency to this mess
here's a data dump for further research, someone might have some additional info on NovelMight LTD, The Mitre Corp., Carlson Corp., Regent Seven Seas and several other BFEE entities and individuals that have recently surfaced.

BAE/BCCI links (compare to Dubai ports proposal)
11-11-2003
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=9008
3-8-2004
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1164252,00.html
11-3-2004
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/business/articles/timid84258?source=&ct=5
3-7-2005
http://www.washingtontechnology.com/news/1_1/mergers/25747-1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
34. As if we needed more evidence to know the report was a JOKE.
I support the 911 truth movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
35. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
36. 9/11 Commissioners Bribed to Omit Pakistan, Says Pakistani Weekly
Telegraph of India
http://www.telegraphindia.com/1060313/asp/nation/story_5962372.asp

Pakistan weekly spills 9/11 beans
OUR SPECIAL CORRESPONDENT

New Delhi, March 12: The Pakistan foreign office had paid tens of thousands of dollars to lobbyists in the US to get anti-Pakistan references dropped from the 9/11 inquiry commission report, The Friday Times has claimed. The Pakistani weekly said its story is based on disclosures made by foreign service officials to the Public Accounts Committee at a secret meeting in Islamabad on Tuesday. It claimed that some of the commission members were also bribed to prevent them from including damaging information about Pakistan. The magazine said the PAC grilled officials in the presence of foreign secretary Riaz Mohammad Khan and special secretary Sher Afghan on the money paid to lobbyists.

(more!)
---

The above is a pick-up of the story from the Indian press. The original was published in subscription-only "The Friday Times" of Pakistan, written by one Ahmed Rauf. Google pegs the link as follows: http://www.thefridaytimes.com/main31.shtml This is what Google lists: "Welcome to The Friday Times" Did Pakistan influence the 9/11 Commission Report? Ahmed Rauf. According to an FO official, "dramatic changes" were made in the final draft of the 9/11 ... www.thefridaytimes.com/main31.shtml - 38k

(As though the Able Danger revelations had not already shown that the 9/11 Commission was a pure, naked fraud.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. .


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemical Bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. I love how the headline...
points out that money to lobbyists is the same as bribes. If only the truth were so easily seen in the US.

Bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. yep....
there's a danger of creating an impression that the 'main players' regards 911 were foreigners, specifically muslims, while almost certainly the main engineers of the disaster were 'westerners' ...nevertheless, the corruption of the fake commission needs as much exposure as possible -it would be ironic that the very racism that the gopigs use to get where they are now causes their exposure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulthompson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. I posted this elsewhere
I find this extremely believable, though I will wait to hear more. The only thing is, the 9/11 Commission didn't need to be bribed since they already had their own motives in suppressing the truth about this and so many other things. Check out this Los Angeles Times article that came out one month before the Commission's final report for more on how much the 9/11 Commission knew much more about Pakistan's ties to al-Qaeda than they were willing to put into their report:

http://scoop.agonist.org/story/2004/6/20/132815/063

Here's my timeline entry about it:

June 20, 2004: 9/11 Commission Figure Says Pakistan Was 'Up to Their Eyeballs' with Taliban and al-Qaeda
“An unnamed senior staff member” on the 9/11 Commission tells the Los Angeles Times that, before 9/11, Pakistani officials were “up to their eyeballs” in collaboration with the Taliban and al-Qaeda. As an example, this source says of bin Laden moving to Afghanistan in 1996, “He wouldn't go back there without Pakistan's approval and support, and had to comply with their rules and regulations.” From “day one,” the ISI helped al-Qaeda set up an infrastructure, and jointly operated training camps. The article further notes that what the commission will publicly say on this is just the "tip of the iceberg" of the material they've been given on the matter. (Los Angeles Times, 6/20/04) In fact, the commission's final report released a month later will barely mention the ISI at all. (9/11 Commission Final Report, 7/24/04)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Thanks Paul
Here's my article about this, which happens to make the same point that well, bribes were hardly necessary to get them to cover up the Pakistani connection (which of course leads back to the CIA).
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060313080211207

And the treatment of the ISI issue in the Justice for 9/11 petition:
http://justicefor911.org/iiA3_PakistaniISI_111904.php


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. Bribed? Shocked and awed am I!
Corruption? About 911; they sure did clean up the crime scene fast. A little to fast for my tastes. Of course that could have been their way of destroying evidence of huge amounts of toxins and chemicals ingested by scared New Yorkers. Don't really know for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC